What is your best/favorite historical cavalry tactic?
Mine is a reputed Mongol use of beating drums quieter as they got closer to the enemy, making it sound like they were going, when they were really coming.
What is your best/favorite historical cavalry tactic?
Mine is a reputed Mongol use of beating drums quieter as they got closer to the enemy, making it sound like they were going, when they were really coming.
A blood-thirsty norse bastard, an opportunistic french-speaking norse bastard, or the King? I think by the laws of fealty there is only one option available.. - sirfiggin
which ever one that beat the mongols.
The Mongols were actually beaten at their own game. Fell for a feigned retreat and then annihilated. See the battle of Ayn Jalut.
charge
Patronised by Voltaire le Philosophe
Therefore One hundred victories in one hundred battles is not the most skillful. Seizing the enemy without fighting is the most skillful. War is of vital importance to the state and should not be engaged carelessly... - Sun Tzu
Orochimaru & Aizen you must Die!! Bankai Dattebayo!!
Too bad that strategy is now over-used to brutal efficiency in RTW and M2:TW.
http://www.shsu.edu/~his_ncp/Stradioti.html
"The stradioti continued the Balkan traditions of cavalry warfare, which used hit-and-run attacks, ambushes, feigned retreats, counterattacks and other tactics little known to western armies of the time."
These tactics were also employed by Skanderbeg, whose armies were more than half cavalry. There's one instance, when in Italy, an Anjou force was enticed into leaving its camp to pursue Skanderbeg's cavalry, when an ambush was sprung and the Anjous were surrounded on three sides.
Last edited by Iskender-bey; August 20, 2009 at 06:07 PM.
wat up?
In ancient times, the psychological impact of striking at infantry flanks and rear (notably Alexander and Hannibal) could have been very effective. Further on, the ability to strike at standing infantry was probably similar in effect, such as Sarmatians, knights (as of the 12th century?) and Polish hussars.
But yes, Mongol tactics of calculated missile power supported by heavier charging cavalry, once their enemy was seriously softened up, must have seemed for some time unstoppable.
Patronised by Voltaire le Philosophe
Therefore One hundred victories in one hundred battles is not the most skillful. Seizing the enemy without fighting is the most skillful. War is of vital importance to the state and should not be engaged carelessly... - Sun Tzu
Orochimaru & Aizen you must Die!! Bankai Dattebayo!!
Whoops, wrong thread - sorry, I keep doing that! My post count should be about four or five less. I need to preview my posts before posting in the correct thread.
Yes, gaius: the articulated relay methods the Mongols exploited with their missile barrages must have been devastating.
I'll state quickly, while I'm here, that one of the greatest displays of utilizing the essentials of missile power, shock, and logistics by an exclusively mounted army was effected by the Parthians at the Battle of Carrhae: with the actual or threat of shock action by the cataphracts upon the legionnaires, the Roman infantry was compelled to keep ranks, hence keeping for the more numerous horse archers a larger, more static target. Bringing along 1,000 or so camels laden with a sufficient surplus of arrows illustrated tremendous foresight on the part of General Surena.
Thanks, James![]()
Last edited by Spartan JKM; August 22, 2009 at 01:25 PM.
"A ship is safe in the harbor; but that's not why ships are built"
Under the patronage of the revered Obi Wan Asterix
Calvin and Osceola, may you both henceforth remain in everlasting tranquility
Akin to Napoleonic 'rock-paper-scissors' warfare whereby cavalry was used to keep infantry in square formation whence they were raked with murderous artillery fire, or attacked by infantry in line.
Didn't a feigned withdrawal at Carrhae lead to the death of Publius, Crassus' son?