It is 15 March 44 BC
Caesar has just been murdered in the senate room. Whose side would you have taken? Those that saw Caesar as a tyrant and supported his killing or Mark Anthony's side?
![]()
Octavian, Mark Anthony ( pro caesarian ).
Brutus, Cicero ( anti Caesarian )
It is 15 March 44 BC
Caesar has just been murdered in the senate room. Whose side would you have taken? Those that saw Caesar as a tyrant and supported his killing or Mark Anthony's side?
![]()
Last edited by EireEmerald; August 16, 2009 at 01:36 PM.
Even though I would probably have been anti-caesarian during Julius Caesar's rein, the murder probably would have swayed me in favor of Caesar, so I would follow the pro-Caesarians
Forget the Cod this man needs a Sturgeon!
the winning side...is my side
wow you are soing badass!!! making all that comments all over this forum on how
ing great you are. man you are my
ing hero!!
I would take pro-ceaserean side since the republic was really corrupt, i would see dictatorship as a middle step to a pure republic, like the one rome had at the beginnig.
You have a certain mentality, a "you vs them" and i know it is hard to see, but it is only your imagination which makes up enemies everywhere. I haven't professed anything but being neutral so why Do you feel the need to defend yourself from me?. Truly What are you defending? when there is nobody attacking?
I would have been with Caesar from start to finish.
I would be with the optimates...
Optio, Legio I Latina
Brutus sounds cool, so I'll side with him.
According to the Theory of War, which teaches that the best way to avoid the inconvenience of war is to pursue it away from your own country, it is more sensible for us to fight our notorious enemy in his own realm, with the joint power of our allies, than it is to wait for him at our own doors.
- King Edward III, 1339
AAAARRR
the senate took my dad on campaign and left him as a garrison in HISPAINIA for 5 years! our farm fell into ruin as all the land is taken into the latifundia while slaves work the land!, the senate recognizes the problems about the increasing poor in Roma and Italia, but do nothing about it, so no one will take the credit and have huge popularity!
then the senate murdered the Gracchi bro's. can the senate make themselves lose support anymore than this ?
Probably the Republicans. But who knows? The irony is, the more Democratic - I mean that in the loosest possible sense, I'm fully aware of the complexities - side of the conflict seemed to have their own interests more in mind than the people's, who at least got lip-service, bread and circuses from the popularist politicians. Chances are 95% of us would have been born into the Plebs. We'd be thinking with our stomachs and our property over anything else.
It's easy to pick sides with the benefits of hindsight and the comforts of modern scholarship to soothe idealism.
morecuriousthanbold.com
Caesar, FTW!
Originally Posted by Marcus Aurelius
lol now wonder you have over 1400 posts and no rep![]()
Cicero and Brutus of course...
Plutarch was pretty sharp on Cassius in his biography of Brutus, and did not recommend him very much. I don't know if he was ironic or not, but Cassius comes out as a pure badass in his pages, even despite his 'criticism'.
Caesarian, Mark Antony was a legend. Although this is solely based upon James Purefoy's performance in Rome, so it's not the most historical of decisions![]()