Note that I said "fastest" and that the fastest is not always the best all around.. I myself believe it to be SRWare Iron which I use often.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SRWare_Iron
Mozilla Firefox
Internet Explorer
Google Chrome
Apple Safari
Opera
SRWare Iron
Netscape
Other (specify)
Note that I said "fastest" and that the fastest is not always the best all around.. I myself believe it to be SRWare Iron which I use often.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SRWare_Iron
I'm not that picky about speed, but voted for Opera, as I use it. So far it's the best browser I've seen.
Under the patronage of the honourable La♔De♔Da♔Brigadier Graham
Err, the Basement...
Anyway, Google Chrome is my favorite so far. I use Firefox as well though.
I find Opera to be very fast.. I would probably rate the top 3 in this order: Iron, Opera, Chrome..
edit: Do you really think this should be in the basement? it is more of a off topic discussion than a technical discussion.
Chrome is really fast, especially with a multi-core processor.
Always used IE for years. Never ever any problems.![]()
Moved.
Firefox has always done me right.
When I still used Windows, I liked Chrome, as I found it to be faster than IE 7, 8 or Firefox 3.0. Since it isn't fully supported on Linux yet, and I haven't gotten around to compiling it on Ubuntu 9.04, I am not sure if the lineup has changed. Safari seems fast, but I haven't really tried it enough to tell. So, right now, all I can say is that I find Firefox to be faster than Opera, or at least on my machine.
A few people recommended SRWare's Iron, so I might try their Linux Alpha. Of course, if they are based on Google Chrome, they might lose their source code base after Google releases the Chrome Linux Distribution.
chrome = epic speed
Firefox = epic customisation
IE = epic fail
I'd say Internet Explorer, but firefox is just so much better I don't care.
Is she... you know...
?Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
I agree. I use this guide which covers a range of settings that can be customized via the Preferences offered in the GUI and settings covered in the "about:config" page accessed by typing it in the address bar. Along with other things such as setting that can be induced by creating / editing the Userchrome.css and Usercontent.css files. These include a range of functionality, performance and security related settings. I thoroughly went through all known to customize to my needs. In real-time performance, merely judging by simple web page loading times, is on par with Opera and Chrome, with which a lot of users are reporting better speeds over Firefox. This includes changing disk cache sizes, maximum connections allocated to a server, HTTP pipelining, DNS cache settings and so on. But this does not factor in with other speed-related factors which a range of browser benchmarking apps cover.Originally Posted by English Tyrant
I don't really care about speed as it doesn't differ a lot. Besides I'm very comfortable with Firefox.
Love is the most powerful thing on Earth, unless you have access to weaponry.
From what i've read, Chrome is faster. Personally i'm happy with Firefox. Just aslong as you don't use IE you're fine.
Give a man a fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of the day.
Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
I enjoy the speed and fluid chrome, it's just nice.
>>>>> METAL BLOGGGGGGGG <<<<<
I <3 Student Loans
EVGA GTX580 1.5GB GPU
AMD Phenom II 955BE C3 3.2GHz @ 19c idle
16GB G.skill 1600MHz RAM DDR3
Corsair Force 3 60GB SSD, 150GB Velociraptor, 2x2TB Storage Drives
Corsair TX650W PSU
Asus 2x24" Vertical Monitors + 1 Sony EX500 46" LCD TV
Corsair Obsidian 800D
Bell FiberOP Internet 70mbps DOWN 30mbps UP
Chrome.
According to the Theory of War, which teaches that the best way to avoid the inconvenience of war is to pursue it away from your own country, it is more sensible for us to fight our notorious enemy in his own realm, with the joint power of our allies, than it is to wait for him at our own doors.
- King Edward III, 1339
Do you expect sensible answers to this question? Most people answering won't have tried all the options you listed.
Iron should have identical performance to Chrome.
A multi-core processor is unlikely to make a big difference with most web workloads.
Chrome is based on WebKit, the same rendering engine as Safari. Iron is identical in that respect. In fact it's identical in pretty much every respect, AFAICT, except that it's rebranded and has some features disabled that its developers don't like.
Chrome has had a developer version for Linux for weeks now:
http://dev.chromium.org/getting-involved/dev-channel
It's unlikely to be less usable than Iron, since Iron is based on exactly the same code (except probably more outdated and/or less tested).
GNU has nothing to do with it. Iron has disabled some features, added an ad-blocker, and lets you change the User-Agent more easily. It doesn't add any other features, according to its own creators. See the feature list here:
http://www.srware.net/en/software_sr...me_vs_iron.php
Note the mention of using more recent WebKit and V8 is bogus. You can get that with the developer channel of Chrome too. My Chrome is using WebKit 532.0 and V8 1.3.2.2, more up-to-date than them. You can check WebKit/V8 versions by typing about:version into the URL bar.
Of course, since Iron isn't actually made by Google, it's probably going to be outdated and poorly tested compared to Chrome. Only really worth using if you're paranoid about Google knowing about you.