View Poll Results: Are the Mumakil too small?

Voters
128. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    69 53.91%
  • No

    59 46.09%
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 55

Thread: Are Mumaks too tiny?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Are Mumaks too tiny?

    Title explains everything.

    Personally I think that they are way too small....

  2. #2
    MasterBigAb's Avatar Valar Morghulis
    Moderator Emeritus Content Emeritus

    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Vaes Dothrak
    Posts
    10,771

    Default Re: Are Mumaks too tiny?

    Quote Originally Posted by hengyu View Post
    Title explains everything.

    Personally I think that they are way too small....
    I personally also agree that they are bit too small, but i have no problem with it (what i like less is the fact that a little troll kills a big mumakil without any problem )

  3. #3

    Default Re: Are Mumaks too tiny?

    I've never tried nor seen trolls against Mumaks lol. Ain't their factions allied?

  4. #4

    Default Re: Are Mumaks too tiny?

    I "voted" for: I would love to have them larger, but I know that'd be bugged as hell, so they're fine.
    Their pathfinding is crappy already, making them larger would make that even worse.

    EDIT: Oh and by the way, it'd be one Mūmak, and two or more Mūmakil (not Mumaks ) [/grammarnazi]
    Last edited by lennartje; August 01, 2009 at 07:07 AM.
    Gameplay > tiny little things

  5. #5
    Warmaster Tibs's Avatar Senator
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Ohio state in the USA
    Posts
    1,451

    Default Re: Are Mumaks too tiny?

    I think theyre fine.
    The AI is like a retarded overwieght child. He realy want all those fries, he just does not know how to get them. http://img1.coolspacetricks.com/imag...unny/81776.gif

  6. #6

    Default Re: Are Mumaks too tiny?

    I think they are fine.

  7. #7

    Default Re: Are Mumaks too tiny?

    Do you think that they're fine as in... you don't mind the shrink, or do you think that they look like what they look like in the films they're based on?

  8. #8

    Default Re: Are Mumaks too tiny?

    I don't mind the shrink. Considering Medieval 2's limited moding ability I am happy that there is a mod like TATW at all.

  9. #9
    Beregond's Avatar TWC boomer
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Ukraine
    Posts
    4,476

    Default Re: Are Mumaks too tiny?

    I cannot imagine how they would fead themselves if they were like in Fourth Age TW,so they are fine as they are

  10. #10

    Default Re: Are Mumaks too tiny?

    Quote Originally Posted by Beregond View Post
    I cannot imagine how they would fead themselves if they were like in Fourth Age TW,so they are fine as they are
    I don't get you...

  11. #11
    Smokey Bear's Avatar Libertus
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    65

    Default Re: Are Mumaks too tiny?

    Quote Originally Posted by Beregond View Post
    I cannot imagine how they would fead themselves if they were like in Fourth Age TW,so they are fine as they are
    Haha, how does this make any sense?

    Anyways I think their size is fine, I've only encountered them a couple of times and I would think if they were any bigger pathfinding would be harder for them.
    "One and One make Two, Two and One make Three, It was Destiny."

  12. #12

    Default Re: Are Mumaks too tiny?

    It is kinda a lore vs game play issue on this one and well i like lore but the gamplay issue is a little to big to convert them to the size you want.

    pathfinding nightmare i would rather see them the size they are now and usuable( and yes there moddeled after the film as all the visuals in the mod are so there size in that regards is not to bad)
    then be turned into a more lore accurate version and be all but utterly unsuable in the game

    Heroes Hordes & beyond The official submod of KGCM (click the sig)

  13. #13

    Default Re: Are Mumaks too tiny?

    Quote Originally Posted by Soul Firez View Post
    pathfinding nightmare i would rather see them the size they are now and usuable( and yes there moddeled after the film as all the visuals in the mod are so there size in that regards is not to bad)
    then be turned into a more lore accurate version and be all but utterly unsuable in the game
    I'm not referring to the lore. They are way bigger in the films...

  14. #14

    Default Re: Are Mumaks too tiny?

    i think Mumakil's sizw is fine as they are now.

  15. #15
    Galain_Ironhide's Avatar Semisalis
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Kalgoorlie Western Australia
    Posts
    410

    Default Re: Are Mumaks too tiny?

    Leave them as they are they are fine to me. And this is from a prospective of playing as the Harad and playing against the Harad.

  16. #16

    Default Re: Are Mumaks too tiny?

    They are fine but bigger is better ooohhhh yeah heh heh heh

  17. #17
    underxground's Avatar Libertus
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Cocoa, Florida Right across the river from Nasa, I look out my window to watch the shuttle launch.
    Posts
    50

    Default Re: Are Mumaks too tiny?

    Dont go by the movies .. go by the lore. PJ made them so the audience would go ooooh and ahhhh.
    But really they were big elephants, not ten story building sized elephants.

    Im soo tired of people saying .... "But in the movies they were ..... "
    The movies represent one persons interpretation of what the cahracters and everything looked like ... not the be all end all.




  18. #18

    Default Re: Are Mumaks too tiny?

    Quote Originally Posted by underxground View Post
    Dont go by the movies .. go by the lore. PJ made them so the audience would go ooooh and ahhhh.
    But really they were big elephants, not ten story building sized elephants.

    Im soo tired of people saying .... "But in the movies they were ..... "
    The movies represent one persons interpretation of what the cahracters and everything looked like ... not the be all end all.


    "Large beasts resembling elephants. Oliphaunts were grey with trunks and tusks and big flapping ears. They were much larger than the elephants of today. Oliphaunts came from Harad, in the far south of Middle-earth. The Haradrim used Oliphaunts in battle and put houses and towers on their backs to carry Men.
    Sam Gamgee hoped to see an Oliphaunt when he learned that armies of Men from the southern lands were going to Mordor. He recited an old fireside rhyme called Oliphaunt, which made Frodo laugh despite his troubles. On March 7, 3019, Sam got his wish. In a battle between the Haradrim and the Rangers of Ithilien, an Oliphaunt broke loose and charged past where Sam stood. The great beast trampled Men as he went and then ran off to an unknown fate."


    I thought that they were way bigger in the books too... Also, can you deny that the mod was based on the movies' visuals?

    Edit: Did more research and found this.

    "
    In the Third Age of the Sun in South Harad there lived beasts of vast bulk that are thought to be ancestors of elephants. Yet the elephants that now inhabit the world are much smaller in size and might than their great ancestors. According to The Red Book they were between 50 and 100 feet (15 and 30 meters) tall with four gigantic tusks and two lesser ones in the face. The Haradrim often used war paint on their mūmakil, to make them more fearsome. The war paint used could differ from the individual Haradrim tribes. "

    Wouldn't that make their size somewhere between five storey buildings and 10 story buildings?
    Last edited by hengyu; August 01, 2009 at 09:52 PM.

  19. #19

    Default Re: Are Mumaks too tiny?

    As masterbigAB said, the only thing who disturb me is the fact that trolls can kill mumakils very easily...Hope for a fix in 1.2!

  20. #20

    Default Re: Are Mumaks too tiny?

    @ underxground hmm i am sure PJ is absoulutly devistated you think he is a douche while he looks at his academy awards sitting on his mantle piece

    I have no doubt you could have made a far better film with such well informed and level headed thinking
    His versions of the story not perfect to be sure but all in all they where a pretty good attempt to convert one medium (books) and translate it to another medium (films) a very hard and never totally successfull venture.... there are a few things i wonder why on earth he did but overall i greatly enjoyed his films

    i must also ask if you find him such an abomination (but strangely enjoyed his films on LOTR) King kong was actually again made very close to the original story of king kong in the books LOL .again not perfect but hey until you can show me a movie you have made and some proof your not a douche, what validaty has your opinion other than it is your opinion my opinion is not worth more than anyones elses it is purely my opinion ....

    I state this as people seem to have this habit of using the phrase "nough said " as if what they have just said is the difinitive answer to something, a gross over statement indeed, a statement that more often than not does little more than show ones ignorance is only over shadowed by there inflated ego of themselves and there opinion .. the world is full of different tastes different people what one likes another will not ,it does not make it then in any way correct for either to say difinitively that it was good or bad mere opinion and i again re iterate my opinion is no more valid than yours they both remain mere statements of opinion not fact ......

    NOUGH SAID LOL
    Last edited by Soul Firez; August 02, 2009 at 02:48 AM.

    Heroes Hordes & beyond The official submod of KGCM (click the sig)

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •