View Poll Results: Should RR/RC be included in a later release?

Voters
88. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes, all of the features would be great to have later.

    23 26.14%
  • No, the developer's have the game balanced as it is meant to be played.

    23 26.14%
  • Meh, having some of it would be enough. Let the developer's of Third Age pick and choose what they want to include.

    42 47.73%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 36

Thread: Do you think RR/RC should be included in a future release?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Do you think RR/RC should be included in a future release?

    I read somewhere that it was a contested issue, whether the lore bonus was worth the potential gameplay loss. What do you think?

  2. #2

    Default Re: Do you think RR/RC should be included in a future release?

    I think it's a great sub-mod. I also think that it should remain as a sub-mod. There's so many things that have yet to come to surface from the development team. All we need to do is be patient. They are doing some really top-notch things with this mod and are going to continue working to keep it that way. Be it new content or better game play (CAI, BAI).

    RR/RC has some great ideas and implements them well. And If I'm not mistaken, Point Blank is apart of the TATW team. Which means some of those great things will be put into future versions of TATW. A lot of people love the hardcore game play RR/RC brings into the mod, but at the same time there are others who wouldn't have the original (and it's patches) any other way than when it was released.

    Apologies...almost (keyword almost) a WALLOFTEXT.
    Last edited by Legionnaire151; July 17, 2009 at 03:41 PM.
    EVGA 132-YW-E180-A1 790i SLI*Q9550@3.6Ghz@1.3v(1.32v real)*6 GB OCZ Gold Triple Channel@1600 MHz, 8-8-8-24-2T@1.65v*Triple SLI GTX 280's*Zalman Reserator 1 V2*Coolmax CUQ-1200B 1200-Watt*Creative Labs X-fi Titanium*Vista Ultimate x64*2 Samsung SM T240's


  3. #3

    Default Re: Do you think RR/RC should be included in a future release?

    Oh please no. It is fine the way it is. RC should remain as a submod.

  4. #4
    George Maniaces's Avatar Tiro
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Alexandria, VA
    Posts
    237

    Default Re: Do you think RR/RC should be included in a future release?

    I trust the devs on this one to do what's best. It's their mod after all, and they've done an outstanding, superb, amazing, awesome, <insert superlative here>, <insert superlative here>, job so far.

    - sig by LuckyNinja

  5. #5
    Blackomur89's Avatar Campidoctor
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Serbia
    Posts
    1,904

    Default Re: Do you think RR/RC should be included in a future release?

    In my opinion the mod is 10 times better with it with all RR/RC components and the included submods.
    But I understand that some people wouldn't like a challenge lore vise gaming experience...
    But don't misunderstand me the mod is phenomenal as it is.
    2D artist for Call of Warhammer TW; 2D artist for Westeros TW; 2D artist and researcher for The Ruins of Arnor TATW sub-mod; 2D artist for Warcraft TW.

  6. #6
    Beorn's Avatar Praepositus
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Athens
    Posts
    5,325

    Default Re: Do you think RR/RC should be included in a future release?

    It should remain optional IMO

  7. #7
    MDT's Avatar Decanus
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    504

    Default Re: Do you think RR/RC should be included in a future release?

    Some nice ideas but the hole sub-mod should stay optional IMO.
    Also I don't think a poll wouldn't be representative for the hole fan base of this mod.
    I think the percentage of the Tolkien purists active in this forum is much higher than in the complete fan base.

    (I assume the creators want this mod be played by as much people as possible, but I'm not in the team so I can't say it definitely)

  8. #8

    Default Re: Do you think RR/RC should be included in a future release?

    I would opt for a solution like in Stainless Steel 6.1, this would mean you can choose whether or not to install RRRC when installing Third Age by simply ticking a box. Works fine imo.

    I agree RRRC is not for everybody, but it´s too good to be left out!
    Last edited by Khosrau; July 17, 2009 at 04:31 PM.

  9. #9
    Hartassen's Avatar Biarchus
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    603

    Default Re: Do you think RR/RC should be included in a future release?

    Quote Originally Posted by Justinianus View Post
    I would opt for a solution like in Stainless Steel 6.1, this would mean you can choose whether or not to install RRRC when installing Third Age by simply ticking a box. Works fine imo.

    I agree RRRC is not for everybody, but it´s too good to be left out!
    Agreed. Especially with the installation part. We could have a poll of all the popular submods and then the users can decide which ones they want installed, the installer could include a small text file describing each submod and what it deos. This helps new users a lot.

  10. #10
    Warmaster Tibs's Avatar Senator
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Ohio state in the USA
    Posts
    1,451

    Default Re: Do you think RR/RC should be included in a future release?

    Quote Originally Posted by Justinianus View Post
    I would opt for a solution like in Stainless Steel 6.1, this would mean you can choose whether or not to install RRRC when installing Third Age by simply ticking a box. Works fine imo.

    I agree RRRC is not for everybody, but it´s too good to be left out!
    I agree with this. I dont see a reason why not to give the option.
    The AI is like a retarded overwieght child. He realy want all those fries, he just does not know how to get them. http://img1.coolspacetricks.com/imag...unny/81776.gif

  11. #11

    Default Re: Do you think RR/RC should be included in a future release?

    where is a link to the description of the rrrc?
    or can someone tell me what it does?

  12. #12
    MaxMazi's Avatar Back in the game!
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Romania
    Posts
    1,245

    Default Re: Do you think RR/RC should be included in a future release?

    Quote Originally Posted by Danigol of South America View Post
    where is a link to the description of the rrrc?
    or can someone tell me what it does?
    ====Real Combat + Recruitment Lore Edition for TATW 1.1 beta released UPDATE JULY 5====
    Last edited by MaxMazi; July 17, 2009 at 05:00 PM.
    Proud son of Louis Lux
    My Gallery / My workshop


  13. #13

    Default Re: Do you think RR/RC should be included in a future release?

    Remain optional while there is a big among of work in RR-RC the change made are not for every one ,i tryed it for a week or so and came back to the vannila 1.1 .

    I started 2 campaign whit RR-RC at first look i was amazed , i started as the silvan elf going for around 100 ish turn , the game is harder more challenge but the time i had my heavy silvan spearman mordor as destroyed rohan-gondor-dale starting having my good unit wen all faction are destroyed was a gamebreaker for me .


    The third age team really know their its probably the best mod on any TW game ever created i have great trust in them and i really thing they will keep impress us whit they next releases .

    Patriotism... is not short, frenzied outbursts of emotion, but the tranquil and steady dedication of a lifetime.

  14. #14
    Aikanár's Avatar no vaseline
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Sanctuary
    Posts
    12,516
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default Re: Do you think RR/RC should be included in a future release?

    Freedom of choice is one of the greatest things one can have. Hence RC+RR + Lore should remain a submod or become a chooseable extension at installation


    Son of Louis Lux, brother of MaxMazi, father of Squeaks, Makrell, Kaiser Leonidas, Iskar, Neadal, Sheridan, Bercor and HigoChumbo, house of Siblesz

    Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts.

  15. #15
    JuL14n's Avatar Centenarius
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    830

    Default Re: Do you think RR/RC should be included in a future release?

    Optional like RC for SS

  16. #16

    Default Re: Do you think RR/RC should be included in a future release?

    No, have it remain as a sub-mod, or at least make it optional.

  17. #17

    Default Re: Do you think RR/RC should be included in a future release?

    RC would be nice. RR, maybe not.

  18. #18

    Default Re: Do you think RR/RC should be included in a future release?

    I play only RC/RR but i think it should be kept seperate, because it´s a bit harder and you need a version for beginners.

  19. #19

    Default Re: Do you think RR/RC should be included in a future release?

    I think it is a bit extreme in some points (Elven Recruitment vs Orcish Recruitment for one), and it makes it quite a bit more challenging. I think that, if the team could pick and chose what gives the game a better play without a major overhaul, it would be a great combination. I trust their opinions in what to add and what to ignore.

  20. #20

    Default Re: Do you think RR/RC should be included in a future release?

    RC/RR dosn't do it for me it tries to imrpove the gameplay by cutting of my legs not giving me the army i have worked so hard to get sitting with 40k does not satisfy me in anyway. maybe we should abandon the income system. i buy crappy units because they cheap and i use them as fodder i dont wanna be forced to buy them when i can afford not to.

    Limitation by income not recruitment slot
    if i could vote i would vote no and if i could vote twice i would vote no twice

    The submod ruins the whole economic sytem of TATW.

    Edit: when you make a poll make a statement like

    Should RC/RR be including in TATW?
    1.Yes
    2.no
    3.It should be up for the devolopers to decide.

    I find it hard to understand if you want it in ? or as optional ?
    Last edited by DeliCiousTZM; July 17, 2009 at 10:11 PM.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •