Master412160 recently asked if I would patronise him. Initially, I was a little hesitant as I did not know him that well, but after researching his contributions to TWC, in the relatively short time that he has been with us, and seeing their quality (considering that English is not his first language), my doubts were dispelled and I am convinced that he is the sort of person who will bring credit to the rank of Citizen.
The above are good examples of his work. He is intelligent and thoughtful, and brimming over with exhuberance, enthusiasm and optimism, furthermore, he obviously cares about setting a good example and is prepared to help others.
Therefore, I am happy to recommend his inclusion into the august ranks of the Citizenry, and patronise him in the great house of Wilpury (all blessings and .... etc.).
Please smile on this new young blood gentlemen he, and his ilk, are the future of TWC.
Tony83
Curious Curialist curing the Curia of all things Curial.
While this seems to be quite an enthusiastic fellow I don't believe that he is ready for Citizenship yet. I don't see any significant contributions, he has neither modded, nor are his debating skills anything special. Entering the Tale of the Week contest a few times, starting two average AARs, and throwing around some ideas simply doesn't cut it in my opinion. Furthermore, both his posts and his articles are full of grammatical errors. While this wouldn't be a huge problem for a modder, it should be taken into account in this case I believe.
Finally, the candidate has been PMing several people asking them to patronize him (including myself). While I wouldn't hold that against him in theory I don't know whether such a behavior is appropriate for a Citizen when taking into account that he apparently PMed more than a few people about this without even explaining why he deserves this rank.
Therefore, I'll have to go with a no.
Curious Curialist curing the Curia of all things Curial.
He has no real contributions, everything he does do is for citizenship, he is one of the people that has PMed nearly every citizen asking for a patron, and his posts are unintelligible. Its nothing personal, he just isn't ready.
He really went to town on that 'paragraph'. I got a bit of a chuckle from the pyramid. I'll look into it, but as with most my initial impression is that he's pinin' for the fjords citizenship, and the contributions seem to be generally lacking at this juncture.
I get the feeling I'm wasting my time here. Just went through the threads he included in his paragraph, and it looks like he wasn't even a main player in them.
If you think one second you know the crisis is gonna be more then 2 years.
Originally Posted by master412160
The Amercan goverment has pout bilions of dollars in those comany's that where olmost bankrupt,and when are they gonna pay back to the state?
Not they will never repay there debt the just don't have the money all these factors play a roll in the crisis.
I've gone through all of them but I don't see any point doing that for each one. Most of them have him being overshadowed by a large group of other posters, if he posts at all. A Citizen can't be expected to always carry the thread, but you'd expect that every Civitate can carry at least one thread or be a main player in most. He seems to just chime in with his 2c now and again without really adding anything to the discussion besides a talking point for other people to add to it.
The TotW submissions are... okay. The same can be said of the AARs. The mod proposals are just that, proposals, and I sincerely hope he doesn't pursue them, because there's way to many mods out there that someone with no desire to learn modding skills tries to start that just end up being a time-suck. Now if he wants to learn modding skills then okay, but I'm a believer that if you have a lot more mod ideas than progress it will never end well. I could give a few examples of people who are like this and start 10 mods because they like the concept and none go anywhere, but I see no point in doing so.
We can sit here and say that English is not his first language and fluency is not a pre-requisite for Citizenship, but the fact of the matter is to debate people have to understand you. I don't go post on Japanese forums despite being a student of the language because it would sound like gibberish to Japanese people. I don't know what nationality this user is, but there are plenty of other language forums out there for the TW games, many of which are our affiliates. So while we can't expect grammatical and literary fluency from ESL members, we have to remember that if you can't read and comprehend what someone is saying it's mighty hard to debate them about it. It's fine where actions speak louder than words, but when all you have to offer is words and the points are covered in a veil of unknown meaning, there's little room to consider it a contribution.
So I'm not going to ask this user to go improve his English, though it would certainly help him here and in his life. But what I do expect to see from him is more action, because all I have to go on right now are words, many of which are hard to understand.
First, asking for a patron is not even a tiny reason to not support the patron's submission.
Last I checked, we do not require perfect English. This is an English language site, and I am certain members post with the tools that they have.
Often, we complain that the citizen does not do enough, Now, I see that doing nearly everything with the goal of citizenship is also a demerit.
Whether the application is for Citivate, Artifex, or Citizen -- we should not disqualify if the label is incorrect. Consider this for citizen since it seems to be a blending of the two. Other than the thread title, I cannot see why the application should be for Artifex
With that little rant behind me, I shall delve into what I learned of the applicant.
The applicant does indeed post a bit everywhere, which is ok.
The D&D posts are usually a one liner and no new data or sources to add to ther discussion. When the applicant starts a D&D thread, the thread is a large cut and past and only a few lines at most of the applicants own thoughts. There is very little follow up in the threads started. The follow up that does exist seems consistent with the short comments without additional information that the applicant uses to respond to other members threads.
Based upon what I see in the D&D, it is a good start on a contribution -- but I think the applicant needs some guidance for growth and development here. It might be his age or academic background, but there needs to be more here to count. On the plus side, he is under control and not trollish -- a good poster from a moderation standpoint.
The contributions to the Tale of the Week do indeed take time and effort. I count these as a contribution. If these were six submissions of work for six issues of ES or Helios, this would also count for something -- not alone , but count. The Tale of the Week should hold as much weight. The stories are not weekly winners, but I can assure CdeC, that is not an easy achievement.
As for the AAR's -- he is working and I am certain practice improves results. A comment from early in the first attempt:
Originally Posted by fergusmck
The new updated text is good. It shows a willingness to change and revise what you have written. All it takes now is practice, and you'll get better as you continue to write your AAR. I like it.
The first AAR was a 6 part over 3 weeks. I would say completetion is a very good sign. The second attempt is a work in progress. It is also in the narrative style. This is better which shows that practice is needed to improve any skill. It still will not be a competition winner or enter the Scriptorium, but I like to see improvement.
The modding ideas are just that -- ideas. Thereis nothing here to count yet.
To sum up -- the D&D needs to be stronger in the individual posts. The Tale of the Week is a solid start as a contribution. The AAR's are also a good start. In both cases, the applicant needs some work on style, plot and character development.
As of today, the answer is a very close no. I hope that the applicant returns in a few months with a stronger resume. The applicant has great potential.
Last edited by Viking Prince; June 29, 2009 at 05:15 PM.
Grandson of Silver Guard, son of Maverick, and father to Mr MM|Rebel6666|Beer Money |bastard stepfather to Ferrets54 The Scriptorium is looking for great articles. Don't be bashful, we can help with the formatting and punctuation. I am only a pm away to you becoming a published author within the best archive of articles around. Post a challenge and start a debate Garb's Fight Club - the Challenge thread
.
Originally Posted by Simon Cashmere
Weighing into threads with the steel capped boots on just because you disagree with my viewpoints, is just embarrassing.
Originally Posted by Hagar_the_Horrible
As you journey through life take a minute every now and then to give a thought for the other fellow. He could be plotting something.
First, asking for a patron is not even a tiny reason to not support the patron's submission.
Of course not, but when the member has PM'd a big number of people with the same PM, asking for Citizenship, then we have an issue.
Last I checked, we do not require perfect English. This is an English language site, and I am certain members post with the tools that they have.
No one ever required perfect English for Citizenship, but when someone is participating in the Discussion and Debate forums and wants to get his Citizenship through that contribution, good English speaking skills are necessary. And to be blunt, master's English is very far from perfect. In fact, it's so bad that I can hardly understand what he's trying to say most of the time.
Often, we complain that the citizen does not do enough, Now, I see that doing nearly everything with the goal of citizenship is also a demerit.
Well, seeing someone pursue Citizenship very ambitiously may irk some Councillors, and that is understandable. However, I personally don't care much about that.
Whether the application is for Citivate, Artifex, or Citizen -- we should not disqualify if the label is incorrect. Consider this for citizen since it seems to be a blending of the two. Other than the thread title, I cannot see why the application should be for Artifex
What the Councillors are supposed to judge here is whether a member's contributions, of any kind, are enough to grant him Citizenship. New Citizens can choose to display whatever badge they wish, whether the applicant is labelled as Artifex, Civitate or Citizen, it matters little.
Based upon what I see in the D&D, it is a good start on a contribution -- but I think the applicant needs some guidance for growth and development here. It might be his age or academic background, but there needs to be more here to count. On the plus side, he is under control and not trollish -- a good poster from a moderation standpoint.
No, it is no good start. I'll repeat that his poor english skills do not allow him to participate in the DD constructively. Most of his posts are one liners and many of them are simply incomprehensible. I see no potential of contribution in the DD.
The contributions to the Tale of the Week do indeed take time and effort. I count these as a contribution. If these were six submissions of work for six issues of ES or Helios, this would also count for something -- not alone , but count. The Tale of the Week should hold as much weight. The stories are not weekly winners, but I can assure CdeC, that is not an easy achievement.
That could have been the case if the stories actually made some sense. But they don't. They're crap, as was his Writing Competition submission. If you need to know why, just take the time and read them. And even if they were a bit better(say, your average TOTW submission), are we going to start awarding Citizenship for TOTW and POTW submissions?
The first AAR was a 6 part over 3 weeks. I would say completetion is a very good sign. The second attempt is a work in progress. It is also in the narrative style. This is better which shows that practice is needed to improve any skill. It still will not be a competition winner or enter the Scriptorium, but I like to see improvement.
It still ranks among the worst AARs on TWC. There is some improvement, but it's still pretty bad.
To sum up -- the D&D needs to be stronger in the individual posts. The Tale of the Week is a solid start as a contribution. The AAR's are also a good start. In both cases, the applicant needs some work on style, plot and character development.
All of what he does is of an amazingly poor quality. His works don't just need some improvement. They need to be completely overhauled if they are to stand on their own feet.
As of today, the answer is a very close no. I hope that the applicant returns in a few months with a stronger resume. The applicant has great potential.
So, someone who can hardly speak english, has absolutely no contributions(as the ones you stated are of an extremely poor quality to count), has gone around PMing dozens of people for Citizenship, and shows little promise of improvement is a "very close no"? It is my firm belief that this is one of the worst Citizenship Applications ever presented to the CdeC, and I was honestly shocked to see master being patronized.
Last edited by Soulghast; July 01, 2009 at 09:20 AM.
Whether the application is for Citivate, Artifex, or Citizen -- we should not disqualify if the label is incorrect. Consider this for citizen since it seems to be a blending of the two. Other than the thread title, I cannot see why the application should be for Artifex
Since I am the one who posted this application here I'd like to point out that I put "Artifex" in the title solely because his patron, Tony83, did the same in his topic in the Pater Familias subforum. Just so there are no misunderstandings.
Curious Curialist curing the Curia of all things Curial.
I am not sure what to say to this application... There are parts that have made me laugh, others that are far fetched without base, others that sound like a proper submission for the citizenship, and others which just seem out of place. He'd be better off just focussing on one out of that jumble of things that he is doing. I'm voting a no. Though he's a nice guy, I don't think he's fit for citizenship.
@Soulghast -- we are not so far apart. The applicant needs to improve his posts. Whether the problem is needing more care in editing due to the problems of English as a second language or due to basic learning issues of English itself -- there is room for improvement. From what I have seen, I think the language barrier is the most important for him to improve.
Just the simple need to write shorter sentences with far fewer commas would help a great deal.
Grandson of Silver Guard, son of Maverick, and father to Mr MM|Rebel6666|Beer Money |bastard stepfather to Ferrets54 The Scriptorium is looking for great articles. Don't be bashful, we can help with the formatting and punctuation. I am only a pm away to you becoming a published author within the best archive of articles around. Post a challenge and start a debate Garb's Fight Club - the Challenge thread
.
Originally Posted by Simon Cashmere
Weighing into threads with the steel capped boots on just because you disagree with my viewpoints, is just embarrassing.
Originally Posted by Hagar_the_Horrible
As you journey through life take a minute every now and then to give a thought for the other fellow. He could be plotting something.
D&D we can discount. The language is not and should not be an issue. There are plenty of people with poor English who can get their point across. They may not be able to discuss the intricacies of antidisestablishmentarianism with the fluency and vocabulary of an english scholar, but thats irrelevant. In this guys case, the effort isn't there. He starts topics and abandons them, he posts one liners, he doesn't actually debate at all and i'm really not seeing the quality that tony refers too.
Modding, pointless inclusion. there's nothing there yet.
AARs and TOTW seem to be the areas where this guy is strongest, but by themselves, the contribution here is not sufficient. There is a great deal of scope for improvement here and in the future, maybe we do have a citizen, but right now, no.