Ok this comes from a discussion in another topic but I wanted to know how many people agree on this.
now we all know UP is a bit strange to play compared to for example GB or france... but seeing the historical facts I am a bit confused about how CA designed UP's gameplay.
I get the part where they are set up for overseas trade and colonies. BUT and this is a large BUT... where is the dutch naval power? there is none. they start with a rather decent trade fleet. but hardly no ships to defend it. altho flyuts where used as defensive trade ships the dutch had a way larger fleet they fended of pirates and other raiders with.
now seeing UP starts with 3 tradings ports and no dockyard I find this weird aswell... as I stated in my other post :
the trade port in europe is stationed near rotterdam (historically correct and still is the largest trading port in the world) but what happened to amsterdam? this was the capital of UP at the time(still is) and thus making it a vital trading port. why not add a dockyard here instead? cause its just plain weird.
the dutch are a strong force even at the start of the 1700 's... altho the golden age ended and it started going downward the dutch at the time still had a navy up to par with the british and in my opinion they should be able to atleast fend off the now finally active pirates... wich right now they are incapable off until later game if played right. since the dutch always were a big trading empire their big adversary has always been pirating either by european nations or by pirates... but they were always defending their trade routes now the game offers no possible solution to this early game. and this is especially the time the dutch were still powerfull...
also the dutch were a mostly neutral nation, and in ETW you practically get forced into war with the spanish and french to take flanders... now the french and spanish being allies is incorrect aswell ill explain :
(my source is wikipedia btw)
in 1700 karel II dies and leaves open the throne to Filips van Anjou under the condition the french and spanish throne wouldn't become one. now in 1701 as some of you might know Lodewijk XIV pushed for a single throne and this started the spanish succesionwars... then in may 1702 the then republic dutch joins the spanish against the french in the spanish succesionwars. (thus making spanish and dutch allies and the french enemies and not both french and spanish enemies while they are allies) during that time the british actually never had an alliance with the dutch since willem III died(thus breaking any ties the dutch had with the british throne) in 1708 they actually declined a peace treaty wich would favor the dutch republic a lot. (just a small part of early history to show that the start of UP is actually incorrect)
dunno if this makes any sense to you guys but I think the dutch should start with atleast a dockyard near for example amsterdam and have a navy on par with GB(not just trading ships).also I think the alliance between the french and spanish should break, if you'd join the succesion wars against the french is up to the player offcourse but atleast make the alliance break.(this would also add more diversity to other nations cause noone really ever bothered with the war against either 2 cause of the alliance between these 2 european super powers) I must agree the new units are a big + and make my campaign more fun BUT it doesn't help naval wise.
now I know most things in game aren't 100 historically correct far from it actually... BUT atleast put some thought into this...
again these are my 2 cents.
what i'd like to know is what do you think on this thought?




Reply With Quote









