Last edited by Hellenikon; June 17, 2009 at 05:56 AM.
I haven't had a look at the stats, but I'm not sure Rohan's cavalry is that bad (or that normal). When playing with Rohan I regularly crushed huge armies of Isengard/OotMM/Rhun with cavalry only armies.
I was mainly refering to the fact that the first cavalry unit of Rohan (the scouts) is a mediocre unit, compared to other tier 1 cavalry units of other factions, like the gondor cavalry militia or the haradrim southron lancers. What i wanted to do is to give Rohan superior cavalry right from the very first units.![]()
I like that.I hope you will make modification for all factions alowing thir units to have different role on the battlefield,and to require diferent tactics,depending by faction.With this submod i wanted to give Rohan a more unique feel, making their cavalry units more available since the beginning, and reducing a bit the some unnecessary units that had very similar roles. Now each unit have a different role on the battlefield. I also wanted each unit to look more different, for example, basic units wear mail while advanced units wear scales.
+rep
Looks promising! And i like that the Eored Horse Archers have their shields on the horse !
fwarrr!!!! Thats more like it!
The Duke of Dunwich and surrounding fiefdom
For any who are interested by my FF on occurrences in Rhun and beyond; I have begun a new project (not because the old one is finished, just opening more room for ideas) about one of the minor characters, Rankal. It is in the Third Age AAR index and here is the link http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showthread.php?t=376994
you should rename scouts to militia to represent the cavalry base of the faction
I was wondering why Rohan had so many infantry units in their armies, too. Your changes are very well done, more variation is always good![]()
Your mod should be included in the next version!
Thank you very much for the support
Sorry, i didn´t understand you, what do you mean? Rohan scouts are no longer in the rohan roster, they are replaced in functions with the riddermark skirmishers.Originally Posted by evinmulligan
I just realised that the helmingas models had a bug... silly of me, i used the wrong body model to their texture and then tried to fix the mistake but only managed to make it more subtle, it was still there... so at last what i´ve done is to use the correct model. The problem was with the reloading animation, that you could see a white spot on the hand.
I´ll soon upload a new version, with the fixed helmingas, and also compatible with the june 12 update of RC.![]()
Its much easier to defend cities with infantry units then cavalry units. Its hard to do street fighting with mounted units.
Every city I capture I always recruit at least 4 (but 6 is better) archer units for the walls. 2 mounted units, and the rest infantry. Trap the enemy at the gates and flank them with your mounted units.
And I agree the first mounted unit Rohan gets is pathetic.
Will this work with the June 12 update
Erhm ... no offence but spear is hardly 'the easiest weapon to wield'. It took way more training to use the spear effectively unlike chop-smash-bash-cutting with sword or axe that any bandit or militia unit without training could do. Spear was among the most skillful weapons and most universal, quite competent in melee contrary to popular belief.
Reading with understanding ftw?
Last edited by Achilla; June 13, 2009 at 09:39 AM.
Man is but a shadow of his former self, encased in feverish delusions of grandeur.
Ignorance is your shield, knowledge is your weapon.
Heart without reason is stupid, reason without heart is blind.
LOL yeah I already understood, but I was just hoping that it would you know?
This is a pretty good mod so I kept hope alive.
No offense but you are wrong, spears were cheap to produce and easy to use, requiring only limited training. That´s why most militiamen were armed with spears in ancient and medieval times.
I´ve decided to not continue updating this submod for now, not because of a lack of interest, but because i am currently having some problems with my PC, and i don´t have much time to keep updating to each new RC version.
I´ll try later and do an update to a future RC version, with the helmingas fix included. Besides that, i won´t be working any more on this project, as altought i appreciate that some of you like the idea, the team of TATW seems to prefer the original rohan roster over this one.
Anyway, Thank you guys for the support
Regards
I think you misunderstood me. Yes, spear was very common weapon because it was easy and cheap to produce and for this reason most peasants and militia rabble got their hands on some sort of polearm weapon throughout history. Yes, even with little training given you could learn your soldiers to move as a formation and even on 1vs1 situation spear was a deadly weapon because of the higher reach and stabbing abilities. Though, spear was very universal weapon used by peasants, professionals and noble alike and it still doesn't change the fact that to truly master the spear it took very serious training. Just because something is already effective with little training involved, doesn't make the weapon obsolete or 'unworthy' of true warriors, quite the opposite. If you asked a medieval professional, noble and peasant the question 'what weapon would you use to save yourself from death?' the answer would be a spear, but each of them would have different reasons behind that choice if you understand what I merely pointed out. I still claim spear was harder to truly master given possible techniques than a sword. And no, we are not talking about oriental sword fencing arts but about european and close east warfare since antiquity to late medieval.
Man is but a shadow of his former self, encased in feverish delusions of grandeur.
Ignorance is your shield, knowledge is your weapon.
Heart without reason is stupid, reason without heart is blind.
I would question that. The sword was long known as the weapon of a man of status and wealth, used by noble infantry and men-at-arms by choice as well as availability. This is universal across many cultures. They would seldom use a spear unless for a particular reason.
Spear, especially 1-handed, is limited to one main attack - thrust. OK it can be overhand, underhand etc, and you can sort of slash with a broad-blade headed spear, but a sword has a lot more techniques to master and is a more flexible weapon, witness the many schools of swordsmanship in medieval times.
In formation spear wins big time. Tbh, it's all cool and logical to carry spear and shield, along with a sword or axe for a switch. As for the swords, I would say it was as well a show-off of social status since not everybody could afford a sword, unlike axe or spear. Heavily armoured knights with swords would usually beat the other to exhaustion and then ransom them for a price instead of killing them, and like we know swords weren't too effective against heavy layers of solid armour. Sure, sword is a good thing, but think of this more of like bow vs crossbow, or bow vs firearm ... ask yourself what is cheaper to produce and maintain, easier to train in the use and more universal and you will have your answer for dominant battlefield weapons that shaped them through centuries and dictated how battles were fought.
Last edited by Achilla; June 14, 2009 at 08:23 AM.
Man is but a shadow of his former self, encased in feverish delusions of grandeur.
Ignorance is your shield, knowledge is your weapon.
Heart without reason is stupid, reason without heart is blind.