Free energy debate
Mylows magnet motor was a hoax, in a long list of hoaxes this is the one no one really wanted to believe. God damn shame but there you are... while reading about that hoax I came across this:
http://www.examiner.com/x-2383-Honol...nergy-machines
An experimental nuclear physicist has written an Open Letter to world renowned physicist, Dr Michio Kaku, challenging his dismissal of non-conventional energy devices - more popularly known as “free energy” machines. In a Coast to Coast AM radio interview on April 18, 2009, Dr Kako dismissed free energy machines as impossible due to their violation of energy conservation laws. Dr Robert Koontz, a nuclear physicist who has worked in various government projects and held Top Secret classification, pointed out the fallacies in Dr Kako’s thinking. Dr Kaku, according to Dr Koontz, needs to reconsider the feasibility of non-conventional energy devices. Otherwise he may suffer the same fate as early scientific critics of the Wright Brothers - critics dismissed the idea of heavier-than-air flying machines as impossible.
Dr Koontz begins his May 15 Open Letter:
Recently, on the popular late-night radio program, "Coast to Coast AM," which reportedly has a listening audience of millions, you indicated that investors call you up daily and ask whether certain inventions will work. Characterizing those devices as "perpetual motion machines" you said they were impossible to make.
Dr Kaku’s dismissal is based on energy conservation laws that are based on the scientific belief that energy can only ever be converted from one state to another. This leads to the view that the amount of energy in the universe remains constant, and no energy is ever lost or created. The idea that a machine can be created which generates more energy than it consumes to run forever has been deemed to be scientifically impossible. The idea of perpetual motion machines has long been discredited and has been used as a kind of scientific slight against those proposing non-conventional energy devices. It is this rigid scientific viewpoint that Dr Koontz directly challenges and goes on to say:
Dr. Kaku: You appear to believe that the universe has 11 dimensions, many of which are supposed to be hidden. Why would that be true while creation of energy using negative mass electrons or using gauge transformations would be impossible? Could you be wrong, sir? Undoubtedly you think you are not wrong, but could you be wrong, sir? You might say to me that negative mass electrons have never been seen. But those many dimensions you believe in have never been seen either. And is it not true that we physicists for decades have used negative mass electrons in our theories in order to reach agreement with experiment?
Dr Koontz’s reference to negative mass electrons is one way in which he believes energy conservation laws can be maintained in an unconventional energy device. He goes on to cite the work of Nobel Prize winning physicists, Dr Paul Dirac, who was the first to introduce negative mass electrons.
When Paul Dirac, the Nobel prize-winning physicist was developing the first form of relativistic quantum mechanics he found it necessary to introduce the concept of negative mass electrons. This subsequently led Dirac to develop the idea that a hole in a sea of negative mass electrons corresponded to a positron, otherwise known as an antielectron. Some years later the positron was observed and Dirac won the Nobel prize.
Another way for an unconventional or “free energy” device to work is for it to use rotating electromagnetic fields using magnets, plasma, or other electrical conductors. This creates what is called a “torsion field” where energy is generated from the rotating objects. According to Dr Elizabeth Rauscher and Nassim Haramein from the Resonance Project, torsion fields power all known rotating objects in the universe from suns and galaxies, to atoms.
Other physicists point to a zero point energy field where a quantum flux creates virtually unlimited energy. Essentially, free or "zero point" energy comes out of the vacuum of space in a manner similar to a bottle of soda that is shaken and opened. This was first theorized by the Dutch physicist Dr Hendrik Casimir in 1948 and later experimentally confirmed. The Casimir Effect is now used in nanotechnology to power microcircuits.
If an unconventional energy device uses negative mass electrons, as Dr Koontz claims, then the energy conservation laws of physics may well be maintained. If “free energy” devices use rotating magnetic fields or zero point energy, there appears to be no way energy conservation laws can be maintained unless one considers energy moving between dimensions. Interestingly, Dr Kaku believes that 11 dimensions exist - some of which are obviously beyond human perception. If so, there are a number of ways in which the energy conservation laws of physics can be maintained across the “omniverse’ of 11 dimensions while considering the feasibility of unconventional energy devices. Perhaps we’ll find some answers if and when Dr Kaku responds to Dr Koontz’s challenge.
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by Seneca
