You can get away with all kinds of stuff if you have some charisma, see Thatcher and Blair, even Bush who...well he was more interesting.
You can get away with all kinds of stuff if you have some charisma, see Thatcher and Blair, even Bush who...well he was more interesting.
Really? Um, I don't know about you, but I don't vote on the basis of how cool somebody is. I don't know anybody who does. I personally think if Gordon Brown exploited his image as a serious, even dour character rather than continuously trying to be all smiles and youtube then it would do him a lot of good.
I have approximate answers and possible beliefs, and different degrees of certainty about different things, but I’m not absolutely sure of anything, and many things I don’t know anything about. But I don’t have to know an answer. I don’t feel frightened by not knowing.
- Richard Feynman's words. My atheism.
Uhm, duh. It clearly does. I'm not arguing the charisma of a specific individual. I'm arguing that charisma is very important if a politician wants to be taken seriously. Even in this non-ideal world.
I have approximate answers and possible beliefs, and different degrees of certainty about different things, but I’m not absolutely sure of anything, and many things I don’t know anything about. But I don’t have to know an answer. I don’t feel frightened by not knowing.
- Richard Feynman's words. My atheism.
Being able to appeal to and convince the masses is a big part of what makes a good politician/leader, if you make a mistake you have a better chance of being able to deflect much of associated flak and fallout. Gordon Brown doesn't really have that particular talent due to his lack of charisma and so he's suffering all the more for it.
People care about money, not charisma.
If you have a normal conversation with somebody 80% of what you remember is the image somebody send out. Somebody sends out a positive image then negative words won't carry the same impact and vice versa.
So it's very important for a politican to come off looking good. Just look at the Kennedy Nixon debate for instance, first television debate for an American president ever. People who listened on the Radio considered Nixon the winner, people who saw it on TV considered Kennedy the winner.
With image alone you can't possibly become a great politician, you can't become one without it either however.
I have both, and I was elected twice. But none of those things are primary to me. The most important is inner strength. Strength does not come from winning. Your struggles develop your strengths. When you go through hardships and decide not to surrender, that is strength. If someone lacks inner strength, he shouldn't get involved in politics, voters don't like girlie boys, voters like strong and powerful leaders.
A PM doesn't need charisma, but it does help.
Take a look a Hitler, he may as well have been the Devil incarnate but he had the masses wrapped around his little finger and hanging on his every word.
Populism did that. Not Hitler's charisma. Hitler was largely a basket case. In fact Hitler marketed himself like Gordon Brown, serious, dour and no messing about. The Jews had to go.
Oratory skills does not necessarily mean charisma, Blair had charisma, he wasn't a good speaker though. All those pauses, stutters, reading, motionless, stupid voice, dumb twang on his tongue.