Pan-Turkism seeks to unite all Turkic countries into a union which would safeguard their interests against their neighbours.
Pan-Turkism has its roots in the "Young Turks" who looked to free Turkic peoples from Russian rule after centuries of decline in the Ottoman Empire.
A map of how such a state would look:
I think the union would be more based on linguistic ties rather than actualy genetic ties since Turks in Anatolia are pretty European genetically:
According to Cinnioglu et al, (2004)[28] there are many haplogroups present in Turkey. The majority haplogroups are shared with European and Near Eastern populations as E3b, G, J, I, L, N, K2, R1, which form 94.1% from the Turkish Gene pool and contrast with only a minor share of haplogroups related to Central Asia C, Q, O - 3.4%, India H, R2 - 1.5% and Africa A, E3*, E3a - 1%. Some of the percentages identified were approximately:
Y chromosome Haplogroup distribution of Turkish people[28]
- J1=9% - Typical amongst people from the Arabian Peninsula.
- J2=24% - Typical amongst Near Eastern peoples.
- R1a=6.9% - Typical of Eastern Europeans
- I=5.3% - Typical of Central Europeans
- R1b=14.7% -Typical of Western Europeans
- G=10.9% - Typical of people from the Caucasus
- E1b1b=11.3% - Typical amongst populations of the Balkans.
- N=3.8% - Typical of Siberian populations
- T=2.5% - Typical of Mediteranean and South Asian populations
- K=4.5% - Typical of Asian populations.
- L=4.2% - Typical of Indian Subcontinent populations.
- Q=1.9% - Typical of Central Asian populations.
I personally oppose this ideology due to not only these factors but also due to the re-writing of history that comes with it.For one thing, such theories seem to neglect the massive cultural influence of Iranians on Turkic peoples in the past 1000 years.









Reply With Quote















