I think the UK shoul leave the EU. The united kingdom has to pay millions of pounds a year to be in the EU and surrport other nations in the union.
Are you with me.
I think the UK shoul leave the EU. The united kingdom has to pay millions of pounds a year to be in the EU and surrport other nations in the union.
Are you with me.
Don't slam the door on your way out.
Any community that gets its laughs by pretending to be idiots will eventually be flooded by actual idiots who mistakenly believe that they are in good company.
Why only the UK, I want too!
Miss me yet?
Together stronger, you guys should adopt the euro and stop the silliness of feeling diferent just because u are in an isle.
Andalusian Cubism.
No, I like it the way things are. But I still don't want to change to the Euro.Are you with me.
Under the Patronage of Jom!
Not with you at all.
Europe has problems, but pulling out wouldn't fix those problems and most likely wouldn't improve anything for Britain.
Yes, hardship brings innovation.
But saying just the UK is insulting to everyone else trapped in it.
Its not insulting, or at least it wasnt meant as a insult, its just the E.U is the topic on everyones lips in the UK and we are seemingly the only country in the E.U who hasnt been given a referendum yet..
Not so i am afraid, i think Britain sold her nuclear deterrent to the USA (dont ask me why!) but the thing is if you have nukes it doesnt make your soverignity defencible it just gives you greater military clout. If you ask me Britains soverignity like many other EU member states, is being slowly crushed like that of a deer being crushed in some giant serpents coils..
The USA wanted the E.U to stop the whole of Europe from falling under communism, and really the E.U does influence the USA enough as it was planned to be, a trading bloc. There is no real need to unify europe and is only invioned in the drunked dreams of MEPs who want even more power and a greater pay check at the end of the day.
As for the rest of europe such areas such as Romania, Poland and Estonia had no hope in hell in going it out alone, so they whore themselves out seemingly to who will keep them and give them the best economic deal, which is causing massive resentment back here in Britain..
Last edited by Lord de Lyonesse; May 26, 2009 at 03:24 AM.
GSTK: Richard Trevelyan [47] - Lord of Lyonesse
So USA does not want EU to have more power to have ability to flip the finger to USA or ability to dictate it's terms to USA on equal position of power?
No, ONLY trading block will NEVER have enough influence on USA. Because such system is so fractured that USA can play one part against the other. As it has done for years.
Without political and military cooperation EU is shooting itself in the leg, unable to truly use it's full potential.
Tell me, in who has in their interests that EU is so handicapped?
It damn sure is not in long term interests of ANY EU nation.
But perhaps Britons are so altruistic that you are willing to bite the bullet for your "brothers" across the sea in faint hope that they sometimes let little crumbs fall from their table to your level.
Which is essentially why "EU must only be trade block!" is idiotic position.As for the rest of europe such areas such as Romania, Poland and Estonia had no hope in hell in going it out alone, so they whore themselves out seemingly to who will keep them and give them the best economic deal, which is causing massive resentment back here in Britain..
It opens up EU to foreign tampering and interference. Essentially neutering the influence EU might else have.
Everyone is warhero, genius and millionaire in Internet, so don't be surprised that I'm not impressed.
How the hell would making the EU have an army help us trade and stop America interfering.. and plus making the EU have its own army would bring about LOADS of problems im pretty sure the french and the germans would start squabbling over its control and then a few years down the line WWIII and us brits would have to sort things out AGAIN!
Owch no need to insult me =/
I disagree, Britons voted in favour of the EU being a trade bloc nothing more..
How?
GSTK: Richard Trevelyan [47] - Lord of Lyonesse
Very simple. Unified political and military under EU will give EU independent powerbase for their defence.
NATO, which is essentially USA dominated, would no longer have influence in EU politics.
Unified political front of EU would force USA to consider it's every action based on possible outcome of whole EU acting in reaction.
Do you think USA would have been quite as gung ho about going to Iraq if whole EU had in one voice said that it is firmly against this action?
Hey, that is what you guys are doing!Owch no need to insult me =/
Seeking to sabotage EU to keep it from becoming serious competitor to USA, following lead of USA to whatever military charade it decides to start...
You elected representatives who worked on making it more. You Britons do not live in absolute democracy, you live in representative democracy. It is YOUR fault if you elected politicians who failed to represent your interests.I disagree, Britons voted in favour of the EU being a trade bloc nothing more..
Or perhaps they DID represent your interests, but Britons are still too stuck up in the past to understand that either you join up with EU and go forward with it or become irrelevant on Global scale.
Like Israel is. Someone tried to present Israel as proof of "power". In reality, Israel is irrelevant. It holds no actual Global power. Only power it has is to bully neighboring even weaker countries to retain status quo.
Hey, did you guys get to vote on joining Iraq war? Why are you not whining about that?
By creating more or widening existing fractures in EU. For EU to work, and everyone in Europe needs EU to work, it needs to present united front to outside.How?
This is again the old story of sticks. Lonely sticks get bent and broken. So will sticks which are there in disarray.
But if they are in one, tightly set bundle, it cannot be bent or broken.
And what is your suggestion to dealing with potential situation where USA uses political or military power to further their interests which hurt European interests?
Economical power only goes so far. And what about situation where Russia starts to put pressure, military as well as political, on EU members and USA decides that it is time to wash it's hands from Europe or at least present threat of doing so unless EU appeases US demands?
We have no existing military organization which would encompass whole EU. It would have to be built from scratch in an instant. It CAN be done, but costs would be far higher. Right now huge portion of Europe is ponying up their defensive abilities to arrangements with USA. Giving USA huge leverage in every negotiation if Americans want to use it.
And they will, sooner or later.
I do not hate America. I treat it like every other huge global power like China or Russia. With distrust. Because USA will damn sure NOT do anything which is in my interests unless those interests happen to coincide with US interests.Thing about Pro-Europeans is they generally hate America, and any Euro-skeptic is automatically labeled America's pet. Likewise, it seems you all seem to want a powerful EU superstate. Why?
If I want my interests to be protected regardless of US, Russian or Chinese interests, I must have all three pillars of power in my own disposal to ensure it. That means, political, economical and military power.
No it is not. Not in long term and not unless you want to be bullied and kicked around by USA, Russia, China and India.If it's a trading block, it doesn't need to have political influence, just ecomomic influence. The EU being a trade block is a perfectly reasonable and valid position.
Reality is that only things you can count on to have are ones you have power to keep. That is what Israel does do correctly. They have obtained enough military power to ensure that their borders are secure.
If they put their faith on someone else to protect them, they would open themselves to abuse by that power.
"Do this or I might not be quite so efficient in protecting you."
Last edited by Tiwaz; May 27, 2009 at 01:00 AM.
Everyone is warhero, genius and millionaire in Internet, so don't be surprised that I'm not impressed.
No.
Originally Posted by A.J.P. Taylor
Originally Posted by Miel Cools
Cò am Fear am measg ant-sluaigh,
A mhaireas buan gu bràth?
Chan eil sinn uileadh ach air chuart,
Mar dhìthein buaile fàs,Bheir siantannan na bliadhna sìos,'S nach tog a' ghrian an àird.
Originally Posted by Jörg Friedrich
Originally Posted by Louis Napoleon III, Des Idees Napoleoniennes
Originally Posted by Wolfgang Held
Jajem ssoref is m'n korewE goochem mit e wenk, e nar mit e shtompWer niks is, hot kawsones
Alrite bye.
(but no seriously, don't leave.)
Yes lets all get out of the EU and go back to feudalism, wene there was no such thing as corruption. I have always liked the idea of putting my own excrements in a pan set it on fire and throw it of the balcony at those damn invading postmen.
How can I believe in God when just last week I got my tongue caught in the roller of an electric typewriter?
- Woody Allen
The EU parlament is corrupt and as the EU grows the more the fee the members have to pay. In the united kingdom this cash could be used to improve the NHS, schools and public public services. At the moment the fee is 40millon pounds. This could be used to better the NHS, schools and orther public things.
Last edited by Captain.E.Blackadder; May 07, 2009 at 03:13 PM.