Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: What is the best difficulty settings for campaign?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    bleach's Avatar Biarchus
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    645

    Default What is the best difficulty settings for campaign?

    What are you all playing on and what do you think makes for most fun campaign?

  2. #2
    **Retired**
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Detroit, MI
    Posts
    2,365

    Default Re: What is the best difficulty settings for campaign?

    For battles you should use H or VH

    for campaign it depends whether you like to explore more diplomatic approach. As the difficulty goes down, you get more opportunity to make diplomatic alliances even with historical enemies.

    Typically H/H - regular
    VH/H - some challenge in battles
    VH/VH - challenging campaign overall
    anything below is waste of time.

  3. #3
    bleach's Avatar Biarchus
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    645

    Default Re: What is the best difficulty settings for campaign?

    Thanks for the response.

    I've been playing on M/M and while the campaign difficulty seems reasonable, the battles are certainly too easy. I'll give M/H a try.

  4. #4

    Default Re: What is the best difficulty settings for campaign?

    im playing with KoJ in VH/H and i have a lot of fun the eggyptians atack me every turn and i have to take a strong care of economy or i dont have an army to defend jerusalem i was forced to make a fleet to reppell the abuyyds navy they were suffucating my economy( koJ depends of the ports to hv some income) it has been hard but fun. now i find the best defense is the attack i siege gaza with Balldwin and heroic win 2 stacks and take the castle, im sieging with a small force the city of damascus, i belive as some income but it will be a very hard battle.

  5. #5

    Default Re: What is the best difficulty settings for campaign?

    For me the best combination is H for the campaign & VH for the battles
    I like to have some opportunity for diplomacy etc which seems absent inVH
    Also in VH campaigns the other factions seem to have huge resources which were impossible when I play as them!

  6. #6
    bleach's Avatar Biarchus
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    645

    Default Re: What is the best difficulty settings for campaign?

    Can someone tell me if the bloody Mongols actually do anything on the higher campaign difficulties? On Medium they seem to just stand around most of the time, it's 1227 in my current campaign and they have not taken 1 settlement yet.

  7. #7

    Default Re: What is the best difficulty settings for campaign?

    They will eventually, they take their time.
    Anri Sugihara



    Click for more info

  8. #8
    Emperor of The Great Unknown's Avatar Primicerius
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    far enough where verizon cant go
    Posts
    3,110

    Default Re: What is the best difficulty settings for campaign?

    M/VH for epic campaigns VH/VH for epic battles.
    Give a man a fish you feed him for a day, teach a man to fish you feed him for a lifetime.
    cant read?

  9. #9

    Default Re: What is the best difficulty settings for campaign?

    Actually, in the past four campaigns of mine (ERE, Rajput, KoJ, Abbasid), the Mongols army only is perhaps half the size of the Khwarezmian's full force. As such, the Mongol event is hardly a game-changer. It's become a constant like the KoJ always losig early to Ayyubids and Armenia not expanding.

    On topic, though, I find H/VH nice and challenging, if nothing else but to see my elite armies crush numerous full stacks of levy units the AI thought could beat me.
    "...most cases of death were mild to moderate..."

  10. #10
    bleach's Avatar Biarchus
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    645

    Default Re: What is the best difficulty settings for campaign?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ma'ahes View Post
    Actually, in the past four campaigns of mine (ERE, Rajput, KoJ, Abbasid), the Mongols army only is perhaps half the size of the Khwarezmian's full force. As such, the Mongol event is hardly a game-changer. It's become a constant like the KoJ always losig early to Ayyubids and Armenia not expanding.
    Funny you should say this, in my Makuria game Armenia was the #1 faction . Not so constant.

    Also, half the size of Kwarezm's force should still make the Mongols a game-changer because the Shah is usually very spread out by that point, and Mongols emerge near the lightly protected rump of their empire with potential to take a number of good cities in the first few turns. But they squander the opportunity by acting so passive.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •