http://www.play.com/Search.aspx?sear...o.x=14&go.y=13
Some help please?![]()
http://www.play.com/Search.aspx?sear...o.x=14&go.y=13
Some help please?![]()
According to the Theory of War, which teaches that the best way to avoid the inconvenience of war is to pursue it away from your own country, it is more sensible for us to fight our notorious enemy in his own realm, with the joint power of our allies, than it is to wait for him at our own doors.
- King Edward III, 1339
Seeing as how "The Definitive Version" with 4 discs is the cheapest DVD version (god knows why), there isn't really a question here.
Edit: Ah ok, I see now...why are DVDs so cheap over there? Either way, "Definitive Version". I mean, how much better can you get than "definitive"?
Last edited by Rapax; April 30, 2009 at 08:21 PM.
Does the "definitive" edition have the extended Director's version? It could just be 3 other discs of bonus material. It also looks illegitimate.
Lol.
Whichever one has the same dvds as this version:
Assuming that different regions have different packaging...
One thing is for certain: the more profoundly baffled you have been in your life, the more open your mind becomes to new ideas.
-Neil deGrasse Tyson
Let's think the unthinkable, let's do the undoable. Let us prepare to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it after all.
Blu-ray Director's Cut.
Accept no exceptions.
Don't get any. Instead, spend your resources obtaining The Young Bride and realize that Turks are the luckiest people on Earth. Or at least the boy is. T__T
FMI check Sher Khan's signature.
Older guy on TWC.
Done with National Service. NOT patriotic. MORE realist. Just gimme cash.
Dishing out cheap shots since 2006.
download the thing.
Whatever has the Director's Cut, because the regular version is nearly unwatchable after seeing the DC.
The version where Russel Crowe plays Balian, like he should've
Isn't it ironic? Ridley Scott will cast Russel Crowe in ANYTHING, but in one role where it'd really suit him, he casts that pretty boy Orlando Bloom instead. Why? Just why?
Better to stand under the Crown than to kneel under a Flag
Life is fleeting, but glory lives forever! Conquer new lands, rule over the seas, build an empire! World Alliances
Because Russel Crowe would have looked stupid as the son of Liam Neeson.
Well get rid of that subplot entirely. Make it closer to history, because Balian was never a poor blacksmith from France. He was actually a veteran commander and knight who had been in the Holy Land for some decades.
Better to stand under the Crown than to kneel under a Flag
Life is fleeting, but glory lives forever! Conquer new lands, rule over the seas, build an empire! World Alliances
One thing is for certain: the more profoundly baffled you have been in your life, the more open your mind becomes to new ideas.
-Neil deGrasse Tyson
Let's think the unthinkable, let's do the undoable. Let us prepare to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it after all.
Wow. Just watched it and what can I say... a masterpiece.
I particulary enjoyed the portrayal of Baldwin IV, such a sad illness to of lived with.
According to the Theory of War, which teaches that the best way to avoid the inconvenience of war is to pursue it away from your own country, it is more sensible for us to fight our notorious enemy in his own realm, with the joint power of our allies, than it is to wait for him at our own doors.
- King Edward III, 1339
Stop making sense.
In fact, I'll do you one better: Liam Neeson taking Jeremy Irons' place as the advisor/knight to Baldwin. Not that he did a poor job, per se, but because it feels wrong to boot Neeson--he did an excellent job, IMHO. Oh, and by removing the need to focus on Orlando Bloom, the knight sidekicks could have been kept alive. That's one nice thing about Crowe; he pulls off a convincing non-modern action hero (Gladiator, 3:10 to Yuma), but he can do it either both alone or as part of a larger crowd. Bloom, on the other hand, is often so quiet and bland as a protagonist, that he would be lost even more in the background if there were entertaining secondary characters around him.
I thought it was pretty good..![]()
According to the Theory of War, which teaches that the best way to avoid the inconvenience of war is to pursue it away from your own country, it is more sensible for us to fight our notorious enemy in his own realm, with the joint power of our allies, than it is to wait for him at our own doors.
- King Edward III, 1339
Director's Cut was definitely better as a movie, but still sucked as a movie about the Crusades.
No matter what, the extra documentaries are fantastic. I got the one widescreen one at the bottom because I was at Wal-mart and it was there and the second disc is great actually.
Join me at dinooftheweek.blogspot.com
i liked the music. and some of the fighting was pretty pwn (longhaired german guy was hardcore)
story felt so fractured though, and bloom definately didnt fit the role he was playing.
oh and how the muslims were all nice and we had evil templar bastards massacring everyone on a whim.. basically the entire historical accuracy i was pissed at but tbh its just an action movie, it doesnt pretend to be accurate.
but for all the history buffs that do get annoyed at historical innacuracies, his coming out with robin hood next - so dont get angry at that, because theres lots of views on robinand besides, does anyone else remember the last robin hood? (played by americans, and an african american 'arab'?)