Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: firearms foot pounds of energy VS real foot pounds per second

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Valiant Champion's Avatar Praepositus
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Central Kentucky
    Posts
    5,402

    Default firearms foot pounds of energy VS real foot pounds per second

    Maybe you guys who have some knowledge of physics can explain to me why firearm cartridges are measured in "ft lbs of energy" i.e.

    mass in grains x velocity x velocity / 450240 = ft lbs in firearms

    actual momentum _____mass in lbs ( grains / 7040 grains to one pound) x velocity = ft lbs

    The second equation is the one that determines a projectile or objects momentum when it hits and object and transfers its energy over. Say for instance a 12 guage shotgun slug

    440 grains / 7040 x 1600 fps = 100 ft lbs of energy / theoretically this should move a frictionless 100 lbs object 1 foot.

    In stark contrast the same projectile is rated as having about 2500 ft lbs of energy using firearms terminology ft lbs of energy.

    Another example is that a .308 with 150 grain bullet traveling at 2800 fps.

    150/ 7040 x 2800 = roughly 59 ft lbs of energy

    However in firearms terminology it generates 2600 ft lbs of energy.

    More than a 12 guage slug.

    Yet we know that a 12 guage slug is far more powerful momentum wise. recoil is nearly twice as hard due to the effects of Newtons law (for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction).

    Then we introduce Taylor's KO formula. He was an expert dangerous game hunter and wanted to find a way to calculate just how much stopping power a bullet has.

    His calculation

    diameter of bullet in inches * (bullet weight in grains / 7040 ) * velocity = KO factor

    Taylor obviously thought that bullet momentum in ft. lbs. was a more realistic than the ft lbs used in common firearms terminology.

    So you can see why I am somewhat confused as to why the firearms industry and media relies on "muzzle energy" to measure cartridge performance aside from being able to print staggering numbers for the eye candy.

    Am I in error to have this opinion?

  2. #2
    Adar's Avatar Just doing it
    Civitate

    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    6,741

    Default Re: firearms foot pounds of energy VS real foot pounds per second

    Quote Originally Posted by Valiant Champion View Post
    Maybe you guys who have some knowledge of physics can explain to me why firearm cartridges are measured in "ft lbs of energy" i.e.

    mass in grains x velocity x velocity / 450240 = ft lbs in firearms (1)

    actual momentum _____mass in lbs ( grains / 7040 grains to one pound) x velocity = ft lbs
    Your comparing a mass*velocity*velocity (=energy) with a mass*velocity (=momentum).

    I think you've misssed this becuase you put both = ft lbs which is wrong. The energy equation (1) should yeld (lbs*ft^2)/s^2 not ft*lbs. Likewise you final expression of (2) should be (lbs*ft)/s. This show that you in one case have calculated the kinetic energy of the bullet and in the other case the momentum of the slug.

    My guess is that the different measurements between slugs and bullets is caused by how they behave when they hit something. A shotgun blast is expected to transfer it's entire momentum to the body it hits (ie all the fragments stop somewhere inside the body). A shotgun fragment also much more quickly looses it's velocity which mean that you might want a measurement less reliant on velocity.

    A bullet is however much more likely to go through the body and therefor won't transfer it's entire momentum to it. Neither will it transfer it's entire kinetic energy (quite obvious since it's still moving after leaving the body) but kinetic energy is normally a more commonly used standard of measurement than momentum.

    You also have this beautiful concept of tradition. It is normally very difficult to overturn an established measurement. Your for example still using lbs, I'm using the metric system which simplifies [mass in grains] x velocity x velocity / 450240] into [(kg*velocity*velocity)/2]. Likewise, when I'm doing particle physics am I using Joule as my measurement of energy. But in thermodynamics kcal (kilocalories) is used becuase it have always been that way and the whole system is built around this way of measuring (1kcal = 4184 Joules).

    Basicly it's easier to teach all newcomers a different way of counting that it is to reform the whole field.

    Edit:Taylors KO factor is probably the best measurement of how dangerous a bullet is. The problem is that most people doesn't know what the number represent. Most people probably doesn't really know what 5000 J means for a firearm cartridge, they do however understand that it will hurt more than the 4000 J cartridge.
    Last edited by Adar; April 27, 2009 at 03:51 AM.

  3. #3

    Default Re: firearms foot pounds of energy VS real foot pounds per second

    This is a big mess, and is quite flawed. Most notably, equating momentum and energy, but also somehow equating pounds-mass and pounds-force which are not the same thing (1 lbf = 32.2 lbm (ft/s)). To make a long story short, here is a list of acceptable units for Energy and Momentum in Imperial Units.


    Energy

    ft x lbf (the previous poster was mistaken, lbf-ft ~ N-m and is the common unit for Energy)


    Momentum

    (ft/s) x lbm

    (ft/s) x Slug (a slug is the Imperial equivilent of a kilogram, where 1 lbf = 1 slug (ft/s2))

    (s) x lbf (Goofy, I know, but I checking my unit conversions twice)


    When doing a typical conservation of momentum equation, you can use lbf-(ft/s) because the 32.2 factor will cancel out, but technically that isn't momentum (mass x velocity) it's (force x velocity). Its like doing a conservation of momentum equation in N-(m/s) instead of kg-(m/s) which isn't done, but will yeild the correct answer.


    But I think the root of the problem is that energy and momentum are getting equated somehow, when they are two totally different things. Both increase with more mass and higher velocity, but energy increases by; Mass x (Velocity)^2 while momentum increases by; (Mass) x (Velocity). Momentum is useful because it can explain the results of collisions, but energy can be used in many more situations.
    Last edited by Sphere; April 27, 2009 at 05:44 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •