nano-thermite found in WTC dust

[gojira]

[Treize]

How strange...

Yes, those Americans certainly know how to create crazy mysteries...

[Bleda]

How strange...

Yes, those Americans certainly know how to create crazy mysteries...

A groundless Youtube video is certainly good at enticing those who are already predisposed to conspiracy theory.

[Viking Prince]

I have met Dr. Jones in seminar. His work has serious flaws and also some interesting pieces to the puzzle. He believes that the dust is proof of explosive devices, but the dust can also be from other sources or may not even be explosive traces. At this point in time scientists are not accepting the theories that are being put forward to explain the evidence.

You will note that there is a bit lacking on the internet for this even though the paper was put forward several years ago. This is very old news.

[skag]

There's something to think about.

Towers like that, are made to resist to a great "normal" heat, like if the tower begins to burn (soeone smoke a cigarette, or i don't know what other normal accident).
Planes only have Kerosene as explosive substance. Burning Kerosene is a "normal heat". Iron of the building structures do not melt at the temperature generated by Burning Fuel, OR AT LEAST, NOT SO FAST !!! You should have to wait hours before waiting the melting of Iron submitted to such temperatures. And I'm not even sure it would ever melt in those conditions, as there's wind that permits to conduce heat out of there.

It's an evidence there was something else.
Who made those "other things" that permitted the towers to collapse ? probably, we'll never know

[Farnan]

There's something to think about.

Towers like that, are made to resist to a great "normal" heat, like if the tower begins to burn (soeone smoke a cigarette, or i don't know what other normal accident).
Planes only have Kerosene as explosive substance. Burning Kerosene is a "normal heat". Iron of the building structures do not melt at the temperature generated by Burning Fuel, OR AT LEAST, NOT SO FAST !!! You should have to wait hours before waiting the melting of Iron submitted to such temperatures. And I'm not even sure it would ever melt in those conditions, as there's wind that permits to conduce heat out of there.

It's an evidence there was something else.
Who made those "other things" that permitted the towers to collapse ? probably, we'll never know

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jet_fuel

And it didn't need to melt, it just weakened the steel so it could no longer support the weight of the floors above it.

[Martin N]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jet_fuel

And it didn't need to melt, it just weakened the steel so it could no longer support the weight of the floors above it.

Of course but what you say is true, if it wasnt for the fact that most of the jet fuel would of burned away on impact, then theres the fact then as soon as the towers collapsed it exploded like there was no tommorow, no matter how much you people want to believe it, jet fuel does not make concrete blow itself up, the concrete was pure dust, jet fuel cannot do that, EVER, and if the jet fuel did indeed melt the towers away, it would not completeley fall down, about a quarter of it would topple off and break away, 3/4 would still remain because there was not any fires below the impact line the steel below it was untouched, thats not to mention the blown out lobby, and the blown out basement, jet fuel did that too ?

Then theres the fact that for over 2 hours the whole of america was defended by less than 40 planes, thats not to mention not one plane was sent up, and no one is asking questions ? no one ever did, thats like calling in a fire, and the engines not moving for hours while the people die, there would be an outrage.

Thermite being found is very worrying, its the very thing used in demolitions, damn those alqueda for planting thermite, damn them to hell!

[★Bandiera Rossa☭]

Of course but what you say is true, if it wasnt for the fact that most of the jet fuel would of burned away on impact, then theres the fact then as soon as the towers collapsed it exploded like there was no tommorow, no matter how much you people want to believe it, jet fuel does not make concrete blow itself up, the concrete was pure dust, jet fuel cannot do that, EVER, and if the jet fuel did indeed melt the towers away, it would not completeley fall down, about a quarter of it would topple off and break away, 3/4 would still remain because there was not any fires below the impact line the steel below it was untouched, thats not to mention the blown out lobby, and the blown out basement, jet fuel did that too ?

Then theres the fact that for over 2 hours the whole of america was defended by less than 40 planes, thats not to mention not one plane was sent up, and no one is asking questions ? no one ever did, thats like calling in a fire, and the engines not moving for hours while the people die, there would be an outrage.

Thermite being found is very worrying, its the very thing used in demolitions, damn those alqueda for planting thermite, damn them to hell!

I don't know If I completely agree with you.. Fuel + impact = friction = spark?

Also if there was Thermite would it not be likely to be an inside job? Perhaps an American did it? perhaps its even..shudder..a government conspiracy.. Maybe those conspiracy theorists were not loony?

also what are they speaking? Danish?

[Carach]

Of course but what you say is true, if it wasnt for the fact that most of the jet fuel would of burned away on impact, then theres the fact then as soon as the towers collapsed it exploded like there was no tommorow,

blew up? were we watching the same tv footage on that fateful day?

building quite clearly collapsed.

if it was all government conspiracy stuff dont u think our lord and saviour mr obama would have come out with it publically now and arrested bush and his evil neocon cronies?

[Dunecat]

blew up? were we watching the same tv footage on that fateful day?

building quite clearly collapsed.

if it was all government conspiracy stuff dont u think our lord and saviour mr obama would have come out with it publically now and arrested bush and his evil neocon cronies?

Obama's in on it too.

Duh.

[Heathen Hammer]

blew up? were we watching the same tv footage on that fateful day?

building quite clearly collapsed.

Like a building that is being demolished?

if it was all government conspiracy stuff dont u think our lord and saviour mr obama would have come out with it publically now and arrested bush and his evil neocon cronies?

Just because presidents change, political elites do not change.

[Panzerbear]

blew up? were we watching the same tv footage on that fateful day?

building quite clearly collapsed.

watch till the end.



weeeeee.....

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

[Heathen Hammer]

Well, there is a plenty of evidence to dicount "official" Washington's stance as propaganda garbage.

[Yorkshireman]

Well, there is a plenty of evidence to dicount "official" Washington's stance as propaganda garbage.

Is there?

Present it then, without citing conspiracy theorist websites and Youtube video's.

[Heathen Hammer]

yes volk your right it was the men of the steppes!

*yawns*

Is there?

Present it then, without citing conspiracy theorist websites and Youtube video's.

1) CIA confiscated video tapes where plane supposedly hits Pentagon and never released them.
2) People near WTC heard exploisions before buildings collapced, that happened beneace them.
3)
Pictures speak better than words.

[Admiral Piett]

Many pages are in fact missing from the public Commission Report.

I don't really believe it was a conspiracy, but there are definitely things being kept from us.

[PointOfViewGun]

At least these claims are more feasible than the claims we've heard in the first year like there was the face of the devil in the explosion clouds.

[Martin N]

Only thing i have to say about the pentagon is, if they had a video showing the plane, they didnt need to remove the actual clips showing the "Plane" from the video, its like me recording a video of big foot, then as evidence removing big foot from the video and showing it people...

Anyone with 1 brain cell could see a plane did not hit the pentagon, for one no holes from when the engine hit, or the wings, or the vertical stablizers, 2. the craftiness of the cia removing footage showing whatever it was that hit the building, and 3. the only place to have reinforced steel/concrete in the pentagon just happened to get hit, and the refurbishment happened a few days before the hit.

Too much of a coincidence

[Admiral Piett]

This article does present some sources and raise some interesting questions.

http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin...cgi?read=20939

There are some others out there. I think that the Independent 9/11 investigation team should be allowed by federal government. It wouldn't hurt. The Independent investigation team isn't backed by any political leniency. Just as another investigation into the JFK assassination revealed new evidence and got the Courts to rule in favor of a probable conspiracy in the late 70s. Independent teams are more efficient and less bureaucratic.

[Martin N]

We cant afford an independant investigation, its way too expensive, you know FF, that more was spent on clintons blowjob trial than on the 9/11 commision, can you believe that S:*** ?