Inequality provides fertible soil for the Maoism, and i believe more and more Maoism military groups will emerge when the Capitalism fail to cope with the crisis.
But where will the first gun be shot? Let's talk freely.![]()
Inequality provides fertible soil for the Maoism, and i believe more and more Maoism military groups will emerge when the Capitalism fail to cope with the crisis.
But where will the first gun be shot? Let's talk freely.![]()
"Live a good life. If there are gods and they are just, then they will not care how devout you have been, but will welcome you based on the virtues you have lived by. If there are gods, but unjust, then you should not want to worship them. If there are no gods, then you will be gone, but will have lived a noble life that will live on in the memories of your loved ones."
- Marcus Aurelius, Roman Emperor from 161 AD to 180 AD
How about one South Asian nation?
I know the Maoism is very strong in India and Nepal.
The maoists allready control Nepal, but you are right about India...
Greetz
Nick
If it did happen it would be put down pretty quickly I think.
Depend on what country. If it's a powerful country such as US, it might be; but in a much weaker one, it might not.
Btw, even US and his NATO allies cant handle Bin Landen for several years. How can a single government depress a strong Maoist Party supported by the poor.
I go with Celente and say "yes", there will be a revolt with regard to the US. If you ask me where it starts first worlwide, it should be Simbabwe.
The power of the government and it's supporters, its influence of the people. Also money and the strength of the professional military. Peasants and farmers would be no match for trained infantry and tanks...
Oh and Bin Laden is very slippery, hiding in all his caves out in the desert. Ever tried to find a needle in a haystack the size of the Middle-East?
Bin Laden is dead.
What΄s with that mao thing? As far as I see it, Maoism doesnt play a role in the west.
Both Maoists and the terrorists adopt the guerrilla warfare. It's not a pitched battle the professional army is used to and it is practical for the guerrilla who is weaker than the goverment army.,
Yes fair enough, they will resist for a while. But in the end the government has more resources, manpower and international support to outlast any rebellion. Only if key people in the government defect and manage to convince some of the military to defect as well would these rebels have any real chance to seize power and take control.
I dont refer to western countries solely?
In a government of corrupt and inequality, desertion is probable.
The 30s saw the rise of fascism, who came to power in ways that closely resembles a revolution. May not be the best example you are looking for.....Precsiely. This is my view, in the West at least. Although a severe recession will probably lead to more wars.
Also, in many places, like Spain or France, communists became very powerful.
Probably in a couple od decades - when people won't have enough material wealth, and government would become more tyranical.
In Europe or the USA no and i consider Russia as part of Europe too.
Now Asia ME Africa there is already instability there so revolutions aren't such a far out thought as one may think.
Generally countries with not enough military power to keep their populations in line may expect trouble.
.........
I would expect more of a rise in nationalist forms of government (not necessarily fascism), at least in Eastern Europe and the Balkans.
A revolution in America and most EU countries is extremely unlikely.