Macro and Micro region Idea

[DeaDBolT]

Well, this sounds like a nice idea, but all i would want is to have more, maybe slightly smaller regions on the map, so a faction cant be conquered in a few turns.

Because, in my Ottoman campaign the Georgians had 3 territories, which i conquered in 5 turns.

The idea of having micro regions, sounds good in theory, but if you want to you can just say "Screw the towns" and take a capital by storm

I also find that the fact that armies seem to be able to travel very far once roads are laid to not aid this problem.

All in aal, ETW indeed feels smaller and a bit too easy in that regard, just my thoughts on the matter of "micro-regions"

Cheers,

[PROMETHEUS ts]

Glad That CA implemented my old Idea of region subdivisions ...

[Generaal van Holland]

I agree with this, a very good idea indeed!

[JPGM22]

I think it is a good idea. It only needs some more discussion and improvements. One thing I know and one thing I want: a bigger campaing map with more regions, and with smaller regions. Regions like Anatolia, Ireland, Portugal, France, Spain, Persia, Mexico, are simply too big, too ridiculous. A campaign map like Victoria II's map it's a good example of a good one.

One other thing that I would like to see is the possibility of the small cities (not only the region's capital) can has barracks and can train troops.