Okay, something I've been mulling over for a little while, sitting on it, thinking about it. I finally decided I might as well toss it out there. Feel free to shoot it down if you don't like it or consider it impractical.
We have a weekly contest(which is why we're called Tale of the Week), featuring multiple stories about a single picture. I enjoy the format, but perhaps we can expand upon it.
What I'm proposing is that each month we take the four winning stories and run them off for Tale of the Month(TOTM). We could advertise this contest on the Front Page and perhaps attract voters from the MAARC competition, which would run consecutively.
I realize the difficulty would be that in the past we've often had the same person win two or more times in the same month. As the contests become more publicized and we attract more entrants, I trust this problem will dissipate. Even if it doesn't, I don't see it as a killer. Only one story will be named Tale of the Month, regardless of who is entered.
Two points will be awarded to the winner, cumulative with the point they had won in the initial TOTW, giving them the same ranking as a second-place finisher in the MAARC.
Then, each winning TOTM will be automatically entered in the mother of all “Tale” contests, the grand and glorious Tale of the Year(TOTY). Twelve TOTM winners, vying against each other for the six points handed out as the prize for winning Tale of the Year. We could do advertising on a massive scale for this, as the culmination of the years' worth of writing. Each Tale of the Month would become an even more epic struggle, as writers vied for one of the only twelve slots, the twelve people going to the finals.
Let me know your thoughts. Personally, I think this approach gives each contest a bigger meaning, something beyond itself and the one point awarded. But I welcome any feedback, negative or positive. Slainte! Theo





Reply With Quote











