Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 76

Thread: The Death of Free Speech?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    The Good's Avatar the Bad and the Ugly
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    California, U.S.A.
    Posts
    5,770

    Default The Death of Free Speech?

    Recently Holland enacted a law stating that it is an offense to bad mouth Islam. This is outrageous and will open the flood gates to other religions and groups. However this isn't an isolated case of free speech being trampled upon.

    The UK, USA, and many European countries have become so politically correct that we are effectively shackling our discussions and the language we use. Free speech to me means that you can say whatever you like. This includes racist views, religious views, anti government views, holocaust denial or anything else. I don't agree with racism or holocaust denials but i will defend anyones right to say such things. That's what free speech is.

    Why are we stopping people from saying what they want? Won't this just cause tensions when one group cannot criticise another? What about asking serious and pertinent questions when we aren't allowed to ask them because someone belongs to a certain group?

    Free speech really seems to be dying, where will it go from here?


  2. #2
    Ahlerich's Avatar Praeses
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Germany, Freiburg
    Posts
    8,270

    Default Re: The Death of Free Speech?

    so teaching your kid not to say bad words is killing freedom of speech as well?
    Last edited by Ahlerich; February 24, 2009 at 08:53 AM.

  3. #3

    Default Re: The Death of Free Speech?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ahlerich View Post
    so teaching your kid not to say bad words is killing freedom of speech as well?
    you can't compare it, islamization is a threat to the West, it must be possible to speak about this problem. Leftists and good-minders are simply afraid of those immigrated violent hordes, they prefer appeasement, abandonment of our culture and values (like free speech).
    Quote Originally Posted by Copperknickers View Post
    Free speech is a stupid idea. It only fuels tensions, it is basically saying 'I can hate people openly and get away with it'.
    LOL. free speech is one of our most importand values! It isn't inciting hate, if you cricize Islam and the behaviour of its followers within our countries.

    Quote Originally Posted by Copperknickers View Post
    Of course if you are going to ask pertinent questions or truthful observations, then that is not hate inciting, but if you are going to say that the holocaust never happened and Hitler was an international hero who killed the vile Jews for us... are you honestly going to tell me that that is a good thing, that people are allowed to say such things? Look at Geert Wilders, people start honestly believing these hate-inciting lies if it is fed to them often enough and without any punishment, it is damaging the world far more than PC ever will.
    &
    Quote Originally Posted by Ahlerich View Post
    its a myths that islamization is a threat to the west. whats the threat? shrinking membership in the catholic church?

    Well basically Wilders is damn right. Koran is a violent book and most of its followers take it word for word serious. There may be moderate Muslims but no moderate islam. The numbers of islamists grow within our countries, they preach hate against the West to the muslim community. The quantity of "honor" kills, forced marriages, rapes of women, who don't wear the headscarf and hate crimes increase rapidly, while the numbers of ethnic f.e. Europeans decrease (demographic change).
    If this isn't a threat to our community and culture, then you're ing blind!
    Last edited by Antagonist88; February 24, 2009 at 11:25 AM.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  4. #4
    Ältester der Motten's Avatar Primicerius
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    North Lanarkshire, United Kingdom
    Posts
    3,682

    Default Re: The Death of Free Speech?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ahlerich View Post
    so teaching your kid not to say bad words
    I wasn't aware there were "bad words", instead of people disappreciating the uasge of certain words in certain circumstances because they consider it indecent.


    Ayway, this time I'll go and join Arty's party.
    Quote Originally Posted by Crocci
    Full freedom of speech would conflict with other rights and laws.
    The fundamental right to be a bloody whiny piece of ?

    There's also a significant difference in foul-mouthing something and telling people how to construct a nuclear bomb with household material.
    Bad one.

  5. #5

    Default Re: The Death of Free Speech?

    Quote Originally Posted by Waaaghboss Skullsmasha View Post
    The fundamental right to be a bloody whiny piece of ?

    There's also a significant difference in foul-mouthing something and telling people how to construct a nuclear bomb with household material.
    Bad one.
    Slander, privacy, copyright, plagiarism, freedom of religion, equality, etc. I said full FoS, remember? No country has full FoS, let's not pretend that there are.
    Quote Originally Posted by A.J.P. Taylor
    Peaceful agreement and government by consent are possible only on the basis of ideas common to all parties; and these ideas must spring from habit and from history. Once reason is introduced, every man, every class, every nation becomes a law unto itself; and the only right which reason understands is the right of the stronger. Reason formulates universal principles and is therefore intolerant: there can be only one rational society, one rational nation, ultimately one rational man. Decisions between rival reasons can be made only by force.





    Quote Originally Posted by H.L Spieghel
    Is het niet hogelijk te verwonderen, en een recht beklaaglijke zaak, Heren, dat alhoewel onze algemene Dietse taal een onvermengde, sierlijke en verstandelijke spraak is, die zich ook zo wijd als enige talen des werelds verspreidt, en die in haar bevang veel rijken, vorstendommen en landen bevat, welke dagelijks zeer veel kloeke en hooggeleerde verstanden uitleveren, dat ze nochtans zo zwakkelijk opgeholpen en zo weinig met geleerdheid verrijkt en versiert wordt, tot een jammerlijk hinder en nadeel des volks?
    Quote Originally Posted by Miel Cools
    Als ik oud ben wil ik zingen,
    Oud ben maar nog niet verrot.
    Zoals oude bomen zingen,
    Voor Jan Lul of voor hun god.
    Ook een oude boom wil reizen,
    Bij een bries of bij een storm.
    Zelfs al zit zijn kruin vol luizen,
    Zelfs al zit zijn voet vol worm.
    Als ik oud ben wil ik zingen.

    Cò am Fear am measg ant-sluaigh,
    A mhaireas buan gu bràth?
    Chan eil sinn uileadh ach air chuart,
    Mar dhìthein buaile fàs,
    Bheir siantannan na bliadhna sìos,
    'S nach tog a' ghrian an àird.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jörg Friedrich
    When do I stop being a justified warrior? When I've killed a million bad civilians? When I've killed three million bad civilians? According to a warsimulation by the Pentagon in 1953 the entire area of Russia would've been reduced to ruins with 60 million casualties. All bad Russians. 60 million bad guys. By how many million ''bad'' casualties do I stop being a knight of justice? Isn't that the question those knights must ask themselves? If there's no-one left, and I remain as the only just one,

    Then I'm God.
    Quote Originally Posted by Louis Napoleon III, Des Idees Napoleoniennes
    Governments have been established to aid society to overcome the obstacles which impede its march. Their forms have been varied according to the problems they have been called to cure, and according to character of the people they have ruled over. Their task never has been, and never will be easy, because the two contrary elements, of which our existence and the nature of society is composed, demand the employment of different means. In view of our divine essence, we need only liberty and work; in view of our mortal nature, we need for our direction a guide and a support. A government is not then, as a distinguished economist has said, a necessary ulcer; it is rather the beneficent motive power of all social organisation.


    Quote Originally Posted by Wolfgang Held
    I walked into those baracks [of Buchenwald concentrationcamp], in which there were people on the three-layered bunkbeds. But only their eyes were alive. Emaciated, skinny figures, nothing more but skin and bones. One thinks that they are dead, because they did not move. Only the eyes. I started to cry. And then one of the prisoners came, stood by me for a while, put a hand on my shoulder and said to me, something that I will never forget: ''Tränen sind denn nicht genug, mein Junge,
    Tränen sind denn nicht genug.''

    Jajem ssoref is m'n korew
    E goochem mit e wenk, e nar mit e shtomp
    Wer niks is, hot kawsones

  6. #6

    Default Re: The Death of Free Speech?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ahlerich View Post
    so teaching your kid not to say bad words is killing freedom of speech as well?
    No, but throwing your kid in jail for saying those bad words is.




    "That war is a terrible thing I agree, but it is not so terrible that we should submit to anything in order to avoid it. For why do we all vaunt our civic equality and liberty of speech and all that we mean by the word freedom, if nothing is more advantageous than peace?" — Polybios, Historiai, IV.31

  7. #7

    Default Re: The Death of Free Speech?

    Quote Originally Posted by Wolfgang von Zweibrücken View Post
    No, but throwing your kid in jail for saying those bad words is.
    Depends on who it's aimed at.
    Quote Originally Posted by A.J.P. Taylor
    Peaceful agreement and government by consent are possible only on the basis of ideas common to all parties; and these ideas must spring from habit and from history. Once reason is introduced, every man, every class, every nation becomes a law unto itself; and the only right which reason understands is the right of the stronger. Reason formulates universal principles and is therefore intolerant: there can be only one rational society, one rational nation, ultimately one rational man. Decisions between rival reasons can be made only by force.





    Quote Originally Posted by H.L Spieghel
    Is het niet hogelijk te verwonderen, en een recht beklaaglijke zaak, Heren, dat alhoewel onze algemene Dietse taal een onvermengde, sierlijke en verstandelijke spraak is, die zich ook zo wijd als enige talen des werelds verspreidt, en die in haar bevang veel rijken, vorstendommen en landen bevat, welke dagelijks zeer veel kloeke en hooggeleerde verstanden uitleveren, dat ze nochtans zo zwakkelijk opgeholpen en zo weinig met geleerdheid verrijkt en versiert wordt, tot een jammerlijk hinder en nadeel des volks?
    Quote Originally Posted by Miel Cools
    Als ik oud ben wil ik zingen,
    Oud ben maar nog niet verrot.
    Zoals oude bomen zingen,
    Voor Jan Lul of voor hun god.
    Ook een oude boom wil reizen,
    Bij een bries of bij een storm.
    Zelfs al zit zijn kruin vol luizen,
    Zelfs al zit zijn voet vol worm.
    Als ik oud ben wil ik zingen.

    Cò am Fear am measg ant-sluaigh,
    A mhaireas buan gu bràth?
    Chan eil sinn uileadh ach air chuart,
    Mar dhìthein buaile fàs,
    Bheir siantannan na bliadhna sìos,
    'S nach tog a' ghrian an àird.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jörg Friedrich
    When do I stop being a justified warrior? When I've killed a million bad civilians? When I've killed three million bad civilians? According to a warsimulation by the Pentagon in 1953 the entire area of Russia would've been reduced to ruins with 60 million casualties. All bad Russians. 60 million bad guys. By how many million ''bad'' casualties do I stop being a knight of justice? Isn't that the question those knights must ask themselves? If there's no-one left, and I remain as the only just one,

    Then I'm God.
    Quote Originally Posted by Louis Napoleon III, Des Idees Napoleoniennes
    Governments have been established to aid society to overcome the obstacles which impede its march. Their forms have been varied according to the problems they have been called to cure, and according to character of the people they have ruled over. Their task never has been, and never will be easy, because the two contrary elements, of which our existence and the nature of society is composed, demand the employment of different means. In view of our divine essence, we need only liberty and work; in view of our mortal nature, we need for our direction a guide and a support. A government is not then, as a distinguished economist has said, a necessary ulcer; it is rather the beneficent motive power of all social organisation.


    Quote Originally Posted by Wolfgang Held
    I walked into those baracks [of Buchenwald concentrationcamp], in which there were people on the three-layered bunkbeds. But only their eyes were alive. Emaciated, skinny figures, nothing more but skin and bones. One thinks that they are dead, because they did not move. Only the eyes. I started to cry. And then one of the prisoners came, stood by me for a while, put a hand on my shoulder and said to me, something that I will never forget: ''Tränen sind denn nicht genug, mein Junge,
    Tränen sind denn nicht genug.''

    Jajem ssoref is m'n korew
    E goochem mit e wenk, e nar mit e shtomp
    Wer niks is, hot kawsones

  8. #8
    Copperknickers II's Avatar quaeri, si sapis
    Citizen

    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    The Carpathian Forests (formerly Scotlland)
    Posts
    12,641

    Default Re: The Death of Free Speech?

    Free speech is a stupid idea. It only fuels tensions, it is basically saying 'I can hate people openly and get away with it'. Of course if you are going to ask pertinent questions or truthful observations, then that is not hate inciting, but if you are going to say that the holocaust never happened and Hitler was an international hero who killed the vile Jews for us... are you honestly going to tell me that that is a good thing, that people are allowed to say such things? Look at Geert Wilders, people start honestly believing these hate-inciting lies if it is fed to them often enough and without any punishment, it is damaging the world far more than PC ever will.
    A new mobile phone tower went up in a town in the USA, and the local newspaper asked a number of people what they thought of it. Some said they noticed their cellphone reception was better. Some said they noticed the tower was affecting their health.

    A local administrator was asked to comment. He nodded sagely, and said simply: "Wow. And think about how much more pronounced these effects will be once the tower is actually operational."

  9. #9

    Default Re: The Death of Free Speech?

    Quote Originally Posted by Copperknickers View Post
    Free speech is a stupid idea. It only fuels tensions, it is basically saying 'I can hate people openly and get away with it'. Of course if you are going to ask pertinent questions or truthful observations, then that is not hate inciting, but if you are going to say that the holocaust never happened and Hitler was an international hero who killed the vile Jews for us... are you honestly going to tell me that that is a good thing, that people are allowed to say such things? Look at Geert Wilders, people start honestly believing these hate-inciting lies if it is fed to them often enough and without any punishment, it is damaging the world far more than PC ever will.
    And you know the absolute truth and can decide what is good and what is wrong?

  10. #10
    Sidmen's Avatar Mangod of Earth
    Moderator Emeritus

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    15,874

    Default Re: The Death of Free Speech?

    Free speech is a stupid idea. It only fuels tensions, it is basically saying 'I can hate people openly and get away with it'. Of course if you are going to ask pertinent questions or truthful observations, then that is not hate inciting, but if you are going to say that the holocaust never happened and Hitler was an international hero who killed the vile Jews for us... are you honestly going to tell me that that is a good thing, that people are allowed to say such things? Look at Geert Wilders, people start honestly believing these hate-inciting lies if it is fed to them often enough and without any punishment, it is damaging the world far more than PC ever will.
    It is a very troubling thing to have governments tell us what is "truth" and what is a lie. I prefer to have retards spewing hatred, you can always shake off words, you can't shake off government interference.
    "For the humble doily is indeed the gateway to ULTIMATE COSMIC POWER!"

    ~Sidmen, Member of the House of Wilpuri, Patronized by pannonian

  11. #11
    Barry Goldwater's Avatar Mr. Conservative
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Richmond, Virginia
    Posts
    16,469

    Default Re: The Death of Free Speech?

    Quote Originally Posted by Copperknickers
    Free speech is a stupid idea. It only fuels tensions, it is basically saying 'I can hate people openly and get away with it'. Of course if you are going to ask pertinent questions or truthful observations, then that is not hate inciting, but if you are going to say that the holocaust never happened and Hitler was an international hero who killed the vile Jews for us... are you honestly going to tell me that that is a good thing, that people are allowed to say such things? Look at Geert Wilders, people start honestly believing these hate-inciting lies if it is fed to them often enough and without any punishment, it is damaging the world far more than PC ever will.
    I'd rather listen to some inbred hick from Alabammy go off with whatever's on his mind that have the government - or anyone else, for that matter - tell us what we can or can't say, thanks. Besides, if the hate-spewing nuts get on your nerves, just don't listen to them or whack them upside the head...is that so hard?

  12. #12
    The Dude's Avatar Praeses
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    I hate it when forums display your location. Now I have to be original.
    Posts
    8,032

    Default Re: The Death of Free Speech?

    First, I refer you to my sig.

    Second, I agree that artificial limits should never be placed on what can and cannot be said. As I state in my sig, the limit of free speech should be common sense. One wants to cross that border? Then he should bear the consequences. We should not have some shoddy law put in place an artificial limit.
    I have approximate answers and possible beliefs, and different degrees of certainty about different things, but I’m not absolutely sure of anything, and many things I don’t know anything about. But I don’t have to know an answer. I don’t feel frightened by not knowing.
    - Richard Feynman's words. My atheism.

  13. #13
    Treize's Avatar Dux Limitis
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Gelderland
    Posts
    16,093

    Default Re: The Death of Free Speech?

    What law?

    There is no special law for islam, lol.

    Not yet...
    Miss me yet?

  14. #14
    Copperknickers II's Avatar quaeri, si sapis
    Citizen

    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    The Carpathian Forests (formerly Scotlland)
    Posts
    12,641

    Default Re: The Death of Free Speech?

    It is a very troubling thing to have governments tell us what is "truth" and what is a lie. I prefer to have retards spewing hatred, you can always shake off words, you can't shake off government interference.
    Maybe you can shake off words, but a large number of people listen and believe these things, simply because they don't know any better. We need to have some way of stopping them, we cannot just ignore them and hope they will go away: they won't, they will just become more of a problem.
    A new mobile phone tower went up in a town in the USA, and the local newspaper asked a number of people what they thought of it. Some said they noticed their cellphone reception was better. Some said they noticed the tower was affecting their health.

    A local administrator was asked to comment. He nodded sagely, and said simply: "Wow. And think about how much more pronounced these effects will be once the tower is actually operational."

  15. #15
    Yorkshireman's Avatar Praefectus
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Leeds, Yorkshire, England
    Posts
    6,232

    Default Re: The Death of Free Speech?

    Quote Originally Posted by Copperknickers View Post
    Maybe you can shake off words, but a large number of people listen and believe these things, simply because they don't know any better. We need to have some way of stopping them, we cannot just ignore them and hope they will go away: they won't, they will just become more of a problem.
    You want to stop people having a choice in what they believe?

  16. #16
    Jagdpanzer's Avatar Praepositus
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Maastricht, The Netherlands.
    Posts
    5,905

    Default Re: The Death of Free Speech?

    Quote Originally Posted by Artorius Maximus View Post
    Recently Holland enacted a law stating that it is an offense to bad mouth Islam. This is outrageous and will open the flood gates to other religions and groups. However this isn't an isolated case of free speech being trampled upon.
    BS. The Netherlands has no such law. Provide a reliable source for this, please.

  17. #17
    Treize's Avatar Dux Limitis
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Gelderland
    Posts
    16,093

    Default Re: The Death of Free Speech?

    Quote Originally Posted by The red knight View Post
    BS. The Netherlands has no such law. Provide a reliable source for this, please.
    Good thing I don't live in Holland, lol
    Miss me yet?

  18. #18

    Default Re: The Death of Free Speech?

    Copperknickels, the very fact that you believe that is scary.

    You'd just as soon be the type of person to support taking away individual rights for the benefit of society.

    Clear violation of what is now considered a natural born human right to express themselves. No matter how uneducated, how poor, or what his political views are. Besides, there are worse things out there than people that don't believe in the Holocaust. Let them whither in their ignorance.
    Heir to Noble Savage in the Imperial House of Wilpuri

  19. #19
    Copperknickers II's Avatar quaeri, si sapis
    Citizen

    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    The Carpathian Forests (formerly Scotlland)
    Posts
    12,641

    Default Re: The Death of Free Speech?

    It is the Truth, Flim. I do not support taking away people's rights, but i do i support the protection of the more important rights. I don't know about you, but i think the right to live happy and free of disgusting insults to you based on your race or sexuality is more important that extreme free speech:

    Universal Declaration of Human Rights

    Article 1.

    All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.

    Article 7.

    All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.

    Article 22.

    Everyone, as a member of society, has the right to social security and is entitled to realization, through national effort and international co-operation and in accordance with the organization and resources of each State, of the economic, social and cultural rights indispensable for his dignity and the free development of his personality.
    Even if you bring Article 19 into this, that is still 3 to 1.
    Last edited by Copperknickers II; February 24, 2009 at 08:54 AM.
    A new mobile phone tower went up in a town in the USA, and the local newspaper asked a number of people what they thought of it. Some said they noticed their cellphone reception was better. Some said they noticed the tower was affecting their health.

    A local administrator was asked to comment. He nodded sagely, and said simply: "Wow. And think about how much more pronounced these effects will be once the tower is actually operational."

  20. #20
    The Dude's Avatar Praeses
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    I hate it when forums display your location. Now I have to be original.
    Posts
    8,032

    Default Re: The Death of Free Speech?

    Quote Originally Posted by Copperknickers View Post
    It is the Truth, Flim. I do not support taking away people's rights, but i do i support the protection of the more important rights. I don't know about you, but i think the right to live happy and free of disgusting insults to you based on your race or sexuality is more important that extreme free speech.
    I agree that free speech in its extremity doesn't work. There must always be limits. But only -once- these limits have been crossed should the problem be dealt with. Not before as then you might prevent the saying of things that actually direly need to be said.
    Last edited by The Dude; February 24, 2009 at 08:56 AM.
    I have approximate answers and possible beliefs, and different degrees of certainty about different things, but I’m not absolutely sure of anything, and many things I don’t know anything about. But I don’t have to know an answer. I don’t feel frightened by not knowing.
    - Richard Feynman's words. My atheism.

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •