http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iaTiRM_0T24
Well i was on m usual websites n stumbled across this?
Creepy, listen on people.
This "IS" martial law in the U.S.A without a doubt
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iaTiRM_0T24
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iaTiRM_0T24
Well i was on m usual websites n stumbled across this?
Creepy, listen on people.
This "IS" martial law in the U.S.A without a doubt
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iaTiRM_0T24
I listened to 1 minute of it, sorry I dont have the time to keep listening to crap like this, I got better things to do. Its standard issue internet conspiracy nonsense with no proof, jumping to wild conclusions based on deliberate distortion of facts etc. Someone cant phantom why the military would need to train in such skills so therefor it must be MARTIAL LAW. Pfft..
It could be geninue yes if there was actually some substances to the claims, actual evidence etc...there is none...there NEVER is any.
Ok then, here is another bit of evidence of what will be soon.
This got cancelled by Obama so I have been told.
But, the thought of them even trying to implement this is beyond staggering.
They just have NO RIGHT whatsoever to do this.
It madness, things like this has to be beaten down.
Transportation Secretary Considers Pay-Per-Mile Tax
By Edward Niedermeyer
February 20, 2009
Transportation Secretary Ray La Hood is considering a transportation tax based on miles driven, to replace gasoline tax revenue. “We should look at the vehicular miles program where people are actually clocked on the number of miles that they traveled,” La Hood tells the Freep, echoing proposals being considered by Oregon, Idaho, Rhode Island, Massachusetts and North Carolina. La Hood argues that gasoline tax revenues “can not be relied on” to fund infrastructure maintenance, presumably because relatively high prices have caused a downturn in gas tax revenue. “One of the things I think everyone agrees with around reauthorization of the highway bill is that the highway trust fund is an antiquated system for funding our highways,” LaHood said. “It did work to build the interstate system and it was very effective, there’s no question about that. But the big question now is, We’re into the 21st Century and how are we going to take care of our infrastructure needs … with a highway trust fund that had to be plused up by $8 billion by Congress last year?” For La Hood the answer to that rhetorical question is “by putting GPS chips in your car and charging you by the mile.”
LaHood has firmly ruled out increasing the gas tax “in a recession,” but Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) is hardly a short-term solution. According to Rob Atkinson, president of the National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing Commission (the guy who figures out how to fund infrastructure) says it will take the better part of a decade to impliment a national VMT scheme. By then the “recession” argument against increasing the gas tax should be gone, and conveniently that method would avoid having to build, maintain and monitor millions of GPS chips. Meanwhile, the only real argument against raising the tax on gas (for which demand is quite inelastic) is political cowardice. La Hood might consider the VMT scheme “thinking outside the box,” but an enormous infrastructure of GPS chip makers, monitors, maintenance, and assessors (not to mention the possibility of privacy intrusions, a notion La Hood airly dismisses) is hardly a streamlined, efficient approach to the problem.
Freep »
Pay by mile tax???
Whatever next, there soon be charging for the ammount of fresh air every1 breaths.
As if everything is there's.
Btw, i got the link from here
http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums...d.php?t=152071
A well credited and top forum.
I got banned because of the mods , who on that site are pathetic to say the least.
Last edited by ginge51; February 21, 2009 at 03:59 AM.
CHange the thread title to something more fitting. Good material you posted, will di git through as soon as I find the time.
Regards,
Goji
P.S: Dont discuss with danzig![]()
The pay per mile tax is is a great deal more fair than the gasoline tax, the purpose of which is to pay for the construction and maintainence of the roadways.
It is a more direct user tax and I'm all for user taxes. As fuel efficency standards go up tax revenue from the gas tax go down, though there is no less wear and tear on the roads. A driver of an electric car will not be paying from the use of the roads one bit, essentially getting a free ride. Eventually hybrid and electric cars will dominate the roadways and the tax base will dry up. Another way to pay for the roads has to be found.
Last edited by The Devil's Sergeant; February 22, 2009 at 06:51 AM.
That's a bunch of horse.
That video was "Bollocks" as our British friends say. Come on, the pit has seen enough conspiracy threads. I wish Garb and sim would create a "Conspiracy subforum"
Learn about Byzantium! http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showt...Toward-Warfare
Civitate,Ex Content Writer,Ex Curator, Ex Moderator
Proud patron of Jean=A=Luc
In Patronicum sub Celsius
Learn about Byzantium! http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showt...Toward-Warfare
Civitate,Ex Content Writer,Ex Curator, Ex Moderator
Proud patron of Jean=A=Luc
In Patronicum sub Celsius
Learn about Byzantium! http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showt...Toward-Warfare
Civitate,Ex Content Writer,Ex Curator, Ex Moderator
Proud patron of Jean=A=Luc
In Patronicum sub Celsius