Page 1 of 6 123456 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 130

Thread: So whos watched Sicko?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default So whos watched Sicko?

    I want a super neo con to explain to me point by point why a UHC system like britian or Frances ' is a nono?


    just want a well rounded look at it

  2. #2
    Farnan's Avatar Saviors of the Japanese
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Right behind you starring over your shoulder.
    Posts
    31,638

    Default Re: So whos watched Sicko?

    Not a neocon but...

    UK Population Density: 246 per Km2
    US Population Density: 31 per Km2
    French Population Density: 115 per Km2 (including French Gueina)
    Cuba Population Density: 102 per Km2
    Last edited by Farnan; February 09, 2009 at 03:56 PM.
    “The nation that will insist upon drawing a broad line of demarcation between the fighting man and the thinking man is liable to find its fighting done by fools and its thinking by cowards.”

    —Sir William Francis Butler

  3. #3
    Heinz Guderian's Avatar *takes off trousers
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    England
    Posts
    16,504

    Default Re: So whos watched Sicko?

    do that again but do it a little clearer. What is UHC?




  4. #4

    Default Re: So whos watched Sicko?

    and i mean super neo con

    neo con like http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Wroj0FLvzs
    *contains obama bashing-ye be warned

    GOD BLESS AMERICA

    UHC is the technical term used by intelectuals to abrevieate UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE
    Last edited by Justinian; February 09, 2009 at 05:29 PM. Reason: double post

  5. #5
    Farnan's Avatar Saviors of the Japanese
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Right behind you starring over your shoulder.
    Posts
    31,638

    Default Re: So whos watched Sicko?

    Not a neocon but...

    UK Population Density: 246 per Km2
    US Population Density: 31 per Km2
    French Population Density: 115 per Km2 (including French Gueina)
    Cuba Population Density: 102 per Km2

    This explains it...

    In the US the population is too spread out for their to be effective nationally administrated health care.
    “The nation that will insist upon drawing a broad line of demarcation between the fighting man and the thinking man is liable to find its fighting done by fools and its thinking by cowards.”

    —Sir William Francis Butler

  6. #6
    Wolfcp11's Avatar Senator
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Hamilton Ontario
    Posts
    1,366

    Default Re: So whos watched Sicko?

    Quote Originally Posted by Farnan View Post
    Not a neocon but...

    UK Population Density: 246 per Km2
    US Population Density: 31 per Km2
    French Population Density: 115 per Km2 (including French Gueina)
    Cuba Population Density: 102 per Km2

    This explains it...

    In the US the population is too spread out for their to be effective nationally administrated health care.


    Canada: 3.2/km2

    Anyway, Sicko is a stupid video. It's almost like communisim. Sure, it can look great to an uneducated outsider, but free healthcare doesn't make the country a magical utopia where no one dies.
    I like our healthcare, but it is not the best thing ever conceived.
    Last edited by Wolfcp11; February 09, 2009 at 09:41 PM.
    "Quotation is a serviceable substitute for wit." -Oscar Wilde

  7. #7

    Default Re: So whos watched Sicko?

    Quote Originally Posted by Farnan View Post
    Not a neocon but...

    UK Population Density: 246 per Km2
    US Population Density: 31 per Km2
    French Population Density: 115 per Km2 (including French Gueina)
    Cuba Population Density: 102 per Km2

    This explains it...

    In the US the population is too spread out for their to be effective nationally administrated health care.
    BUT, the very largest majority of the population lives within an hour or so of a major metropolitan area. I have no idea of the exact number, but I would guess 90% of the population would be within that distance.
    "oooh a gypsy wind is blowing warm tonight, sky is starlit and the time is right. Now you're telling me you have to go...before you do there's something you should know." - Bob Seger

    Freedom is the distance between church and state.

  8. #8

    Default Re: So whos watched Sicko?

    It's usually a vague rant about socialism. Farnan's argument can be rejected as Australia has universal healthcare alongside a private system. Canada has universal health care. Both have lower population density than the USA. Norway and New Zealand too.
    Last edited by removeduser_487563287433; February 09, 2009 at 04:03 PM.

  9. #9
    Farnan's Avatar Saviors of the Japanese
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Right behind you starring over your shoulder.
    Posts
    31,638

    Default Re: So whos watched Sicko?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ferrets54 View Post
    It's usually a vague rant about socialism. Farnan's argument can be rejected as Australia has universal healthcare alongside a private system. Canada has universal health care. Both have lower population density than the USA.
    Canada does it through a universal insurance type program, like would be possible in the US.

    Australia's population only has a low population density if you take in account the uninhabitable land.
    “The nation that will insist upon drawing a broad line of demarcation between the fighting man and the thinking man is liable to find its fighting done by fools and its thinking by cowards.”

    —Sir William Francis Butler

  10. #10

    Default Re: So whos watched Sicko?

    And what about New Zealand?

  11. #11
    Osceola's Avatar Protector Domesticus
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Port Richey, Florida
    Posts
    4,660

    Default Re: So whos watched Sicko?

    I'm sick as hell currently, and have had no health insurance for bout a year and a half now.

    I don't see any problems with Canada, that place looks rather damn nice. I wouldn't say we should adopt EU or UK healthcare due to size, but Canada always made sense to me.
    Team Member <3

  12. #12
    Farnan's Avatar Saviors of the Japanese
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Right behind you starring over your shoulder.
    Posts
    31,638

    Default Re: So whos watched Sicko?

    Ferrets: Its about 1/37th the size of the US...
    “The nation that will insist upon drawing a broad line of demarcation between the fighting man and the thinking man is liable to find its fighting done by fools and its thinking by cowards.”

    —Sir William Francis Butler

  13. #13

    Default Re: So whos watched Sicko?

    Quote Originally Posted by Farnan View Post
    Ferrets: Its about 1/37th the size of the US...
    So is GB?:hmmm:

    Sicko is a lot of Left Wing fanaticism to be sure, although I thought it touched on some good points.
    They give birth astride of a grave, the light gleams an instant, then it's night once more.

  14. #14

    Default Re: So whos watched Sicko?

    The UK does have private insurance still as well, we have BUPA.

    Anyway, the thought of a corperation having to make a profit out of sick people just turns my stomach. Why would capitalist ideals fit at all into keeping people healthy? Health provides long term social and economic benefits. Medicare need to always chase the next Quartre profits

    Denmark, Sweden and Norway have really top quality healthcare and they are the most socialist contries I know of.

    P.S. America is a land of Urban sprawl. Whats the population density in California? Got to be huge. Little town USA has to be what 10%? 20% of the population at a guess?
    Last edited by Beanbee; February 09, 2009 at 04:14 PM.
    "I saw one today and in his hand
    Was a weapon that was made in Birmingham"
    -Billy Bragg, Island of No Return

  15. #15

    Default Re: So whos watched Sicko?

    So what, it's now the size of a state that determines whether or not it can have universal healthcare? That brings us back to Canada and Australia.

  16. #16
    Farnan's Avatar Saviors of the Japanese
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Right behind you starring over your shoulder.
    Posts
    31,638

    Default Re: So whos watched Sicko?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ferrets54 View Post
    So what, it's now the size of a state that determines whether or not it can have universal healthcare? That brings us back to Canada and Australia.
    Its a combination of the factors of size and population density.

    As I said the Canadian plan will work in the US. In that plan the government pays private health care services to treat Canadians.

    Australia is at a point where the area where there are people are tiny and concentrated, while the US its more spread out thus requiring more clinics and hospitals and special equipment for each.
    “The nation that will insist upon drawing a broad line of demarcation between the fighting man and the thinking man is liable to find its fighting done by fools and its thinking by cowards.”

    —Sir William Francis Butler

  17. #17

    Default Re: So whos watched Sicko?

    Population density/size is an utter white elephant. There's only one thing keeping Americans from having universal healthcare and it's that the majority of Americans don't want it. Whether this is from misinformation or greed, that's the ultimate fact of the matter.

  18. #18
    Farnan's Avatar Saviors of the Japanese
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Right behind you starring over your shoulder.
    Posts
    31,638

    Default Re: So whos watched Sicko?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ferrets54 View Post
    Population density/size is an utter white elephant. There's only one thing keeping Americans from having universal healthcare and it's that the majority of Americans don't want it. Whether this is from misinformation or greed, that's the ultimate fact of the matter.
    No it isn't...

    You need clinics for people within a certain radius, and a certain number of hospitals per so many people, correct?

    In a large country with a spread out population means more clinics working less people, and more hospitals since they need to be within life flight range. Now this is not a disastrous thing, however centrally run its a mess as someone in DC has no idea what is needed in Bum Wyoming and Congressmen, eager to bring home the bacon get hospitals built where they aren't needed.

    However, a system where we keep the existing health care infrastructure and instead pay a universal insurance plan will enable the hospitals to remain decentralized and still provide a system where everyone can receive health care (like in Canada).
    “The nation that will insist upon drawing a broad line of demarcation between the fighting man and the thinking man is liable to find its fighting done by fools and its thinking by cowards.”

    —Sir William Francis Butler

  19. #19

    Default Re: So whos watched Sicko?

    Quote Originally Posted by Farnan View Post
    No it isn't...

    You need clinics for people within a certain radius, and a certain number of hospitals per so many people, correct?

    In a large country with a spread out population means more clinics working less people, and more hospitals since they need to be within life flight range. Now this is not a disastrous thing, however centrally run its a mess as someone in DC has no idea what is needed in Bum Wyoming and Congressmen, eager to bring home the bacon get hospitals built where they aren't needed.

    However, a system where we keep the existing health care infrastructure and instead pay a universal insurance plan will enable the hospitals to remain decentralized and still provide a system where everyone can receive health care (like in Canada).
    Wait, so there's existing infrastructure to care for the USA's population, but hypothetical universal health care infrastructure is an impossibility?

    Are you suggesting private healthcare has a monopoly on flying clinics or something?

    (I do however view paying for the use of private healthcare a perfectly acceptable solution, so long as the money is actually delivered where needed).

    Quote Originally Posted by The Guide View Post
    The french system is oodles better then British and canadian system as in those systems everything free which creates huge amounts of abuse and puts very heavy strain on the system. There isn't any repercussion for going to the emergency room and wasting hundreds of dollars of government money for tests to determine you have the common cold this causes huge waits for doctor appointments, Michael Moore doesn't explain any of the caveats with the system just spews idealistic bull. In the french system, at least you have to pay at least 40% of you final bill, thats good enough to stop abuse but enough to put some relief on the common man, though even then there are flaws with the system as it's completely free for use by foreigners which does put strain on the system.
    The result of this, however, is that French doctors prescribe drugs for anything whereas British doctors quite rightly tell people to take two days off work and go to bed.
    Last edited by removeduser_487563287433; February 09, 2009 at 04:27 PM.

  20. #20
    Farnan's Avatar Saviors of the Japanese
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Right behind you starring over your shoulder.
    Posts
    31,638

    Default Re: So whos watched Sicko?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ferrets54 View Post
    Wait, so there's existing infrastructure to care for the USA's population, but hypothetical universal health care infrastructure is an impossibility?

    Are you suggesting private healthcare has a monopoly on flying clinics or something?

    These clinics are ran by one or two doctors and a few support people. When a doctor leaves or retires it doesn't mean he will be replaced unless their is a demand for a doctor. And whether a new doctor is necessary is not always apparent from a DC map, as some regions the level of transportation, climate and median age means a hospital, even one close by, may be unaccessable to many. However in order cases it was just long-time customers that kept the clinic alive due to a personal relation with the doctor and his leaving makes the clinic unnecessary.

    (I do however view paying for the use of private healthcare a perfectly acceptable solution, so long as the money is actually delivered where needed).
    We can just provide it as an insurance policy for people that choose to take it. They fill out paperwork when they go to the doctor and then the doctor sends it in to the regional center as they would regular insurance.
    “The nation that will insist upon drawing a broad line of demarcation between the fighting man and the thinking man is liable to find its fighting done by fools and its thinking by cowards.”

    —Sir William Francis Butler

Page 1 of 6 123456 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •