Before I open a discussion that ensures much gnashing of teeth both here in the peanut gallery and at CA, let me salute CA for developing a series of products that, flaws notwithstanding, represent a significant step forward in computer gaming.
Okay. Much has been made of the state of the AI (and game depth in general) in the TW series. Upon the slightest provocation, I am quick to offer the observation that CA always chooses style over substance, graphics over deep gameplay. In their defense, CA is a for-profit company and it's always hard to argue with success. However, I have long pondered an intriguing question that I now pose to the community at large. I am not sure what will result but let's see.
Question: you walk into a game store and see three games sitting side-by-side on the shelf. They are all versions of Empire Total War, the next release in the series. All are identical except: Game A is the standard version with currently-expected improvements. Game B costs 5 bucks more but promises (and delivers) significantly-improved AI over Game A. The one on the right (Game C) costs ten bucks more but promises (and delivers) massively-better AI. Which game would you buy? Why?
Serious answers only, please.




Reply With Quote











