Five options...
Though I was specifically thinking of Europe in the poll, please add your opinions to the thread regardless of where you are.![]()
Halt immigration completely and deport all illegals. Asylum given only if there is a threat to the seekers life and no neighboring country will accept them. No citizenship until 12 years of residency.
All immigration subject to strict annual limits on numbers. Probationary asylum for legitimate applicants only, revoked when threat to seeker no longer exists. No Citizenship until 6 years of residency.
All immigration to be brought into line retroactively with annual Emigration. EU migrants given preference. Asylum seekers to be fully accommodated and can apply for citizenship. No citizenship residency restrictions.
Immigration unfettered apart from a high overall annual limit. No preference for EU migrants. Asylum seekers to be accommodated regardless of circumstances. No citizenship residency restrictions.
Complete amnesty for illegal immigrants in your nation and full removal of any current restrictions on immigration. Immediate citizenship for all non-criminal immigrants.
Five options...
Though I was specifically thinking of Europe in the poll, please add your opinions to the thread regardless of where you are.![]()
Last edited by CrayonVonCaesar; January 28, 2009 at 03:12 PM. Reason: Poll added
Against, a massive flood of immigrants will put a strain on our economy and healthcare services, plus they may not integrate...
PS, where's the poll? (if there is supposed to be one)
________
Tifosi
Last edited by Barry Goldwater; March 13, 2011 at 03:19 AM.
I don't really have anything against people from moving from one country to another. Immigrants have a tendency to do all the jobs the native population can't be bothered doing anyway.
Last edited by Helm; January 28, 2009 at 01:40 PM.
Well,I wouldn't mind if they would be nice and just work in this country,then yes...
But if they would be just like those young Muslims in Western countries then no...
Also,my country won't have any immigrants for at least 50 years...we're too poor...![]()
O Sancta Simplicitas!
Define ''mass immigration'': an actual mass immigration influx, far larger than normal immigration; or just ''high'' immigration? The majority of folks here seem to believe the latter.
Originally Posted by A.J.P. Taylor
Originally Posted by Miel Cools
Cò am Fear am measg ant-sluaigh,
A mhaireas buan gu bràth?
Chan eil sinn uileadh ach air chuart,
Mar dhìthein buaile fàs,Bheir siantannan na bliadhna sìos,'S nach tog a' ghrian an àird.
Originally Posted by Jörg Friedrich
Originally Posted by Louis Napoleon III, Des Idees Napoleoniennes
Originally Posted by Wolfgang Held
Jajem ssoref is m'n korewE goochem mit e wenk, e nar mit e shtompWer niks is, hot kawsones
No thanks...
Only high educated europeans please!!
Oh no wait I don't want them to rule us...
Smaller numbers...
Miss me yet?
I am against "mass" everything.
No mass money!?!?!? Or Heineken?!
Miss me yet?
Against any immigration.
We are living a economic and social crisis and they still want to come here?
Stay at home.
This. If anything, im for the opposite of immigration. My country should use deportation a lot more. Yeah man. I know the 7% of my countrymen who have no jobs are virtually unwilling to work. They would rather starve and live off welfare, in shame, then be construction workers...for an appropriate example.![]()
Last edited by Scar Face; January 28, 2009 at 02:04 PM.
We need moar Poles to fix this Poll. I dont mind the recent influx of Europeans from Poland, Romania, Bulgaria etc into Britain. They work hard, do a good job and some of the girls are pretty hawt.
Absolutley Barking, Mudpit Mutt Former Patron: Garbarsardar
"Out of the crooked tree of humanity,no straight thing can be made." Immanuel Kant
"Oh Yeah? What about a cricket bat? That's pretty straight. Just off the top of my head..." Al Murray, Pub Landlord.
I could choose to avoid a steaming pile of shite, or stamp on it for fun!
Both the poll and your response to my factual point that EU members have, more or less unrestricted freedom of travel or residence, tells me that you are utterly ignorant of our laws, namely Directive 2004/38/EG.
http://europa.eu/scadplus/leg/en/lvb/l33152.htm
Absolutley Barking, Mudpit Mutt Former Patron: Garbarsardar
"Out of the crooked tree of humanity,no straight thing can be made." Immanuel Kant
"Oh Yeah? What about a cricket bat? That's pretty straight. Just off the top of my head..." Al Murray, Pub Landlord.
Against.
Sigh...
I've never been fond of immigration on anything more than a subtle scale.
I'm against it.
The politicians have yet to understand that mass immigration does not, and have never worked.
The economy immediately got worse when the masses arrived, the hospitals are overrun by people that want to check the slightest injury or when they have a headache, as the healthcare is free here(well, the taxpayers pay), people grab the opportunity. Where there were no ghetto, there is several. Where crime in small towns was almost non-existant, aside from public drunkeness and a bicykle stolen now and then, people are getting robbed and raped on a daily basis.
I want my old country back where the immigrants arrived in small waves, and integrated well, and didn't make demands on the host country.
Yes, there are some very good people coming as well, but the bad one's clearly outweight the good one's.
August Strindberg: "There's a view, current at the moment even among quite sensible people, that women, that secondary form of humanity (second to men, the lords and shapers of human civilisation) should in some way become equal with men, or could so be; this is leading to a struggle which is both bizarre and doomed. It's bizarre because a secondary form, by the laws of science, is always going to be a secondary form. Imagine two people, A (a man) and B (a woman). They start to run a race from the same point, C. A (the man) has a speed of, let's say, 100; B (the woman) has a speed of 60. Now, the question is 'Can B ever overtake A?" and the answer is 'Never!'. Whatever training, encouragement or self-denial is applied, the proposition is as impossible as that two parallel lines should ever meet."
The problems in Europe really make you question the stubbornness and thickheadedness of some people. With mass crime waves from predominantly Muslim communities, and a whole slew of 'human rights' issues coming forth from that, still the politicians [by and by] refuse to acknowledge the problem. I mean, recent polls in the Netherlands cite 57% of the population see's Islam as a threat to its national identity. Clearly there are problems. And yet, at least on the Governmental level, there are few effective cries for change.