historical problem

[TWmadman]

DLV is a great mod, the most challenging, and my favourite one.
the main problem is that i can't stand historical mistakes especially the huge ones. For example, the game starts in 1080 and it is very annoying to see ENGLAND owning CEAN, RENNES, BORDEAUX and ANGERS! damn!
in 1080 the kingdom of ENGLAND only exists since 1066 officialy and it is the vassal of the kingdom of FRANCE! anachronism is so annoying.
in 1080 ENGLAND is nothing, FRANCE is smaller than actual map version, MOORS owns more territories in spain etc.

as a conclusion, i have nothing against england hehe it is a simple exemple and for me, the best one. i would like to know if someone could fix provinces, to make something more historicly accurate.

btw : KoJ units are very weak and get too many provinces, furthermore, it doesn't even exist in 1080 (jerusalem was taken in 1099), but i understand it could be easier to stay like this to avoid any merging faction which could be hard to mod. Anyway, i suggest to give Acre, Antioche etc between turks and ayyubids as it should be. if you like, keep jerusalem and kerak to crusaders, BUT give it to FRANCE! french crusaders only took jerusalem in 1099

it would be nice that someone try to mod thoses advices, give your opinion please

thank you

[mattgonzo]

...

[TWmadman]

ps : if i seem angry, forgive me, it s all about my love for DLV hehe
i think with more accuracy, DLV could have no rival (with all respect i have for SS and BC team)
for the case of France, i suggest to let rennes, bordeaux, angers to rebels and let caen to England as Guillaume le conquérant was Duke of Normandie. but i guess accuracy has been sacrifice to give minimum provinces to rebels... dunno

[repman]

Don't know if you mean DLV because DLV starts at 1180 and the historical campaign map is quite correct

repman

[TWmadman]

sorry i made myself a mistake, i tought it began in 1080, all my apologies repam