Page 10 of 10 FirstFirst 12345678910
Results 181 to 200 of 212

Thread: Roma Surrectum 2.0: Cimbri Faction Preview

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    saxdude's Avatar Vicarius Provinciae
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    House of Erotic Maneuvering
    Posts
    10,420

    Default Re: Roma Surrectum 2.0: Cimbri Faction Preview

    They are playing on the misticism and terror caused by the germanians, romans, gauls and their enemy in general made them out to be big monsters.

  2. #2
    Blackshamrock.'s Avatar Campidoctor
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Cork city Ireland
    Posts
    1,557

    Default Re: Roma Surrectum 2.0: Cimbri Faction Preview

    There's some great looking units there. Keep up the good work guys. You certainly know how to keep us happy . I can't Waite for it to come out. Thank you again.
    And When he Gets to heave to st peter he will tell. One more Soldier reporting sir I've served my time in hell.


  3. #3

    Default Re: Roma Surrectum 2.0: Cimbri Faction Preview

    Superb review as always!

  4. #4

    Default Re: Roma Surrectum 2.0: Cimbri Faction Preview

    Wow, this looks amazing. Seems like a lot of hard work went into this and it is well researched and presented.

    However, I have one issue, if you can call it that. This seems to be more of a general Germanic faction than a pure Cimbrian faction, which I noticed after the Batavi and the Canenefatae were included, who were Romanized tribes who did not really get written about until the Batavian Revolt in 69 AD, while on the other hand what we know from the Cimbri comes from around 113-101 BC. That's almost a 200 year difference, kinda like the Creative Assembly including the Iceni as a faction in Rome II haha, the locations are also fairly different.

    Other than that, keep up the good work.

  5. #5
    Arnspac's Avatar Miss You Calvin
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,549

    Default Re: Roma Surrectum 2.0: Cimbri Faction Preview

    Quote Originally Posted by LemonySniffit View Post
    Wow, this looks amazing. Seems like a lot of hard work went into this and it is well researched and presented.

    However, I have one issue, if you can call it that. This seems to be more of a general Germanic faction than a pure Cimbrian faction, which I noticed after the Batavi and the Canenefatae were included, who were Romanized tribes who did not really get written about until the Batavian Revolt in 69 AD, while on the other hand what we know from the Cimbri comes from around 113-101 BC. That's almost a 200 year difference, kinda like the Creative Assembly including the Iceni as a faction in Rome II haha, the locations are also fairly different.

    Other than that, keep up the good work.
    Well every merc unit is available for the entire time frame of 300+ years.

    Certain legions have a trip mechanism before they can be recruited.

    Setting the same parameters for different mercs or peoples would be maddening.

    Post # 60 may shed some light on who or what the Cimbri may have been, or just confuse the issue more.
    The Works of Tacitus: The Oxford Translation, Revised, with Notes, Volume 2 - search Cimbri...

    Read the notes on those pages, very interesting.


    The travels of these people most assuredly made for contact with other tribes. The Batavi were originally Chatti but broke away as did the Mattiacians.

    It's eye-candy and for the pure enjoyment of the player.
    Cu mândrie, under the Patronage of leif_erikson


    There is no disease I spit on more than treachery.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •