Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 33

Thread: Archers versus Xbows

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    General Tony's Avatar Civis
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    I live in a small california town, and I mean small lol
    Posts
    130

    Default Archers versus Xbows

    So ive noticed that most of the factions I like dont have any archers other then pesant archers. Then they only have xbows. This majorly annoys me as I am a fan of archery and therefore archers too. I have also never liked xbows that much.

    So can anyone recomened factions that have archers and are fun to play? Or tell me about xbows and why you like them?

  2. #2

    Default Re: Archers versus Xbows

    england in my opinion has the best choices for archery, they have about 5 different ones as well as xbows. i myself prefer xbows because of the armor peircing attributes, but the longbows of england are quite deadly combined with their range. archers seem to have less ammunition but definatly have higher firing rates which could account for that disreptancy, so i go with xbows for the durability as i rather enjoy locking the enemy in place then flanking with ranged weapons, on the side (provided ive dealt with cavalry) a few of my front line will die to these volleys, however all but the most hardened of enemy units will rout, conceding the battle to me.
    id do this with archers but often, at least for me, they are out of ammunition by the time my flanking maneuvre is safe to perform. plus, their spread seems to be more larger than xbows, and that puts my front line at greater risk of dieing.


  3. #3
    Owain Glyndŵr's Avatar Semisalis
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Colorado, United States
    Posts
    482

    Default Re: Archers versus Xbows

    If you're a fan of archery in general, maybe you'd be impressed by horse archers? If I use HA's I prefer to be using them with a Western faction like Hungary.

    As for foot archers, I agree; English longbows will give just about any other ranged unit a run for their money. I'll continue to use them even in the late era even after handheld weaponry has been introduced. If the enemy has longer-ranged gunners like Musketeers, you'll need to counter with fast cavalry(such as Demi Lancers) or artillery.


    [SIGPIC]http://www.twcenter.net/forums/signaturepics/sigpic46560_1.gif[/SIGPIC]


    My post on the political profile thread.

    Formerly known as Ford_King.

  4. #4
    General Tony's Avatar Civis
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    I live in a small california town, and I mean small lol
    Posts
    130

    Default Re: Archers versus Xbows

    Guess I should have added "besides england" lol...but yes I do think HA are pretty impressive. Ive always figured its gota be somewhat difficult to handle a sword or spear on a horse but useing a bow on a horse, wow thats gota take some training. Im thinkin of trying Russia, HA and a strong foot archer unit.

  5. #5

    Default Re: Archers versus Xbows

    Quote Originally Posted by General Tony View Post
    Guess I should have added "besides england" lol...but yes I do think HA are pretty impressive. Ive always figured its gota be somewhat difficult to handle a sword or spear on a horse but useing a bow on a horse, wow thats gota take some training. Im thinkin of trying Russia, HA and a strong foot archer unit.
    If its soley horse archery you want to try out, Russian, Turks, or Hungary would be your best best, also I would again reccomend Turks since they have a huge array of foot-archers, such as ottoman infantry, who have the range of longbows but are very competent melee fighters as well, also they have Jannissary archers who can implant stakes, and have the same range as their english counter-parts....
    "The fact is that a man who wants to act virtuously in every way necessarily comes to grief among so many who are not virtuous."
    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

    >>========Niccolo Machiavelli=====>

  6. #6

    Default Re: Archers versus Xbows

    The turks would probly be your best bet, though I can't say for sure. I've never actually played them for very long.

  7. #7
    Double A's Avatar person man
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Northern Cackalackistan
    Posts
    23,338

    Default Re: Archers versus Xbows

    Venice has good archers (Venitian Archers) as well as excellent xbows! Plus they get lots of good gunpowder units late game.

    And let's not forget the Italian Spear Militias...
    Jon had taken Donal and Benjen’s advice to heart: Sam may be fat and pathetic, but he is still a member of the watch, and one of the few black brothers who isn't a rapist or thief. (out of context, this sounds ridiculously racist)
    super awesome music thing | political profile
    GSTK member - Join today! (We're restarting. Again.)

  8. #8
    Geordie-warlord's Avatar Miles
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    newcastle upon tyne
    Posts
    332

    Default Re: Archers versus Xbows

    longbows on the walls during a siege and they can loft the arrows in to the rear of the attacking army and kill there heavy cav when there sitting in a nice line for you..lol
    the later yeoman and retiune are good in hand to hand so can hold there own on the wall if any pesky ladders turn up.
    xbows on the other hand are not to good yeah sure they have there moments and come in handy against heavy armour but only if you can get them into a good position

  9. #9

    Default Re: Archers versus Xbows

    France and Scotland have Scottish Guard, i like them.
    And Ireland has some with a name i cant remember, liked them too.

  10. #10

    Default Re: Archers versus Xbows

    Scottish Noble Archers are half decent in melee. Byzantine Trebizond archers have a longer range than most archers iirc. And they got some tasty horse archers as well.

  11. #11

    Default Re: Archers versus Xbows

    Crossbows are armor piercing and powerful. Also, their bolts have a flatter trajectory causing them to more easily hit smaller formations. Pavise crossbowmen are fairly cheap and are pretty much the most powerful foot missile unit until muskets.

    For archery factions, my favorite would be the Byzantine Empire. Their Trebizond archers are good, long range and cheap, and the guard archers are good in melee too. They get a good selection of horse archers too.

  12. #12

    Default Re: Archers versus Xbows

    Quote Originally Posted by Old_Scratch View Post
    Crossbows are armor piercing and powerful. Also, their bolts have a flatter trajectory causing them to more easily hit smaller formations. Pavise crossbowmen are fairly cheap and are pretty much the most powerful foot missile unit until muskets.

    For archery factions, my favorite would be the Byzantine Empire. Their Trebizond archers are good, long range and cheap, and the guard archers are good in melee too. They get a good selection of horse archers too.

    Yeah but with the byzantines you don't get any gunpowder units. You'll reliant on mercs.

  13. #13

    Default Re: Archers versus Xbows

    Factions with good archers:
    Byzantine Empire - good long-range foot archers and excellent HAs.
    England - long-range and armor-piercing longbows.
    Egypt - some long-range archer units and decent HAs, but nothing really exceptional.
    France - powerful longbowmen and HAs with an armor-piercing bonus! Both are fairly late-game.
    Hungary - decent HAs. Foot archers are kind of lacking.
    Russia - some of the most powerful non-AP archers and awesome HAs.
    Venice - pretty good long-range archers with good melee skills to boot.
    Turks - good long-range archers who can set stakes (Janissaries). Also good HAs.

    Um... can't think of anything else...
    "People don't think the universe be like it is, but it do." -- Neil deGrasse Tyson


    In Soviet Russia you want Uncle Sam.

  14. #14
    Double A's Avatar person man
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Northern Cackalackistan
    Posts
    23,338

    Default Re: Archers versus Xbows

    Mongols...
    Jon had taken Donal and Benjen’s advice to heart: Sam may be fat and pathetic, but he is still a member of the watch, and one of the few black brothers who isn't a rapist or thief. (out of context, this sounds ridiculously racist)
    super awesome music thing | political profile
    GSTK member - Join today! (We're restarting. Again.)

  15. #15

    Default Re: Archers versus Xbows

    Yeah, but they're unplayable.
    "People don't think the universe be like it is, but it do." -- Neil deGrasse Tyson


    In Soviet Russia you want Uncle Sam.

  16. #16
    Double A's Avatar person man
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Northern Cackalackistan
    Posts
    23,338

    Default Re: Archers versus Xbows

    Quote Originally Posted by Surgeon View Post
    Yeah, but they're unplayable.
    In the Grand Campaign. In Kingdoms, in Teutonic or Crusades you can hotseat jump to them.

    And there's always custom battles.
    Jon had taken Donal and Benjen’s advice to heart: Sam may be fat and pathetic, but he is still a member of the watch, and one of the few black brothers who isn't a rapist or thief. (out of context, this sounds ridiculously racist)
    super awesome music thing | political profile
    GSTK member - Join today! (We're restarting. Again.)

  17. #17
    Senator
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    1,212

    Default Re: Archers versus Xbows

    I find that I don't really use archers unless they're decent hand-to-hand, since they tend to chew threw their ammo pretty quickly and their area-effect fire ups the odds of friendly fire once the lines hit. Crossbows are more precise and have a little more staying power, so I usually have them focus their fire on one particular enemy (the general's unit is a favorite).

  18. #18

    Default Re: Archers versus Xbows

    crossbows get on my nerves, they need a lot more micro management than archers and are not half as effective once the front lines have engaged, because of their flat trajectory you cant put them behind your own troops unlike archers who can fire over them
    "...and all the men and women merely players."

  19. #19

    Default Re: Archers versus Xbows

    Right, crossbows are better in the field, like muskets, as 60 crossbow bolts is really, really effective against everything really... but you need them really stretched out to be effective, so their use requires a lot of battlefield control. but archers are better in a siege as the crenelations don't get in the way. Plus flaming arrows are great if you set the foe's only ram on fire.

    BTW, I play darthmod, so I'm not sure in normal ME2.
    "I mean, look at this. *Gestures towards machinery* It's obviously designed to rip people's arms off.

    What's the difference between a pirate and a ninja? A ninja is right behind you.

    What's the best time to give a ninja a hug. DON'T.

  20. #20
    Yojimbo's Avatar Pig tail Sock
    Citizen

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Normandy Sr-2
    Posts
    7,628

    Default Re: Archers versus Xbows

    Xbows are very good because they pierce armor and they are common as mercs and easily trained in both cities and castles. they also come in the pavise version to protect them further from misses unlike archers.Crossbows can kill anything including knights and heavily armored troops, archers mostly waste arrows on heavy troops, making Xbows more versatile. And lets not forget Genoese Crossbow Millita one of the most annoying early game units.
    Read my author bio!
    Like my Facebook page!
    New guides for ROTS and FOTS!
    Please post feedback in the thread!
    Professional mod disliker.
    Writer for Android Rundown.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •