On October 15, 2008, Anthony Faiola, Ellen Nakashima, and Jill Drew wrote a lengthy article in the
Washington Post titled, "What Went Wrong".
[175] In their investigation, the authors claim that former Federal Reserve Board Chairman
Alan Greenspan, Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin, and SEC Chairman Arthur Levitt vehemently opposed any regulation of
financial instruments known as
derivatives. They further claim that Greenspan actively sought to undermine the office of the
Commodity Futures Trading Commission, specifically under the leadership of
Brooksley E. Born, when the Commission sought to initiate regulation of derivatives. Ultimately, it was the collapse of a specific kind of derivative, the
mortgage-backed security, that triggered the economic crises of 2008.
On October 17, 2008, attorney
Timothy D. Naegele wrote an article in the
American Banker entitled, "Greenspan's Fingerprints All Over Enduring Mess," which argues that Alan Greenspan's actions and inactions triggered the economic crises of 2008. The article discusses 'the economic tsunami that has been rolling worldwide with devastating effects'; and the author asserts that 'Greenspan is the architect of the enormous economic "bubble" that burst globally'. The author cites
Giulio Tremonti, Italy's Minister of Economy and Finance, who said: "Greenspan was considered a master. Now we must ask ourselves whether he is not, after [Osama] bin Laden, the man who hurt America the most."
[176]
While Greenspan's role as
Chairman of the Federal Reserve has been widely discussed (the main point of controversy remains the lowering of
Federal funds rate at only 1% for more than a year which, according to the
Austrian School of economics, allowed huge amounts of "easy" credit-based money to be injected into the financial system and thus create an unsustainable economic boom
[177][178]), there is also the argument that Greenspan actions in the years 2002-2004 were actually motivated by the need to take the U.S. economy out of the
early 2000s recession caused by the bursting of
dot-com bubble - although by doing so he did not help avert the crisis, but only postpone it.
[179][180]
Many
libertarians, including Congressman and former 2008 Presidential candidate
Ron Paul[181] and
Peter Schiff in his book Crash Proof, predicted the crisis prior to its occurrence. They are critical of theories that the free market caused the crisis
[182] and instead argue that the Federal Reserve's printing of money out of thin air and the
Community Reinvestment Act are the primary causes of the crisis.
[183] However Alan Greenspan himself has conceded he was partially wrong to oppose regulation of the markets, and expressed "shocked disbelief" at the failure of the self interest of the markets, which according to neo-liberal economic theory should have protected shareholder equity.
[184]
It has also been argued that the root cause of the crisis is
overproduction of goods caused by
globalization.
[185] Professor
Herman Daly suggests that it is not actually an economic crisis, but a crisis of
overgrowth beyond sustainable ecological limits.
[186]
An Objectivist/Capitalist Analysis of the Finanical Crisis
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by Exarch
)
