Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Mathematical opinions: serious stuff this time

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Ummon's Avatar Indefinitely Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    19,146

    Default Mathematical opinions: serious stuff this time


  2. #2
    chris_uk_83's Avatar Physicist
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Lancaster, England
    Posts
    818

    Default Re: Mathematical opinions: serious stuff this time

    What exactly is it that you want to know? If you want to know if the maths they quote is real then it's pretty difficult to say with any certainty unless you know what the letters actually stand for and you'd have had to have been at the lecture for that. However, the few equations that were there were equations that describe periodic motion, which seems to be what the slides are about so I'd say that it probably does check out.

    The actual material seems fairly mundane stuff though, I thought we knew that brain waves changed during different activities or levels of consciousness.

    If I've helped you, rep me. I live for rep.

  3. #3
    Ummon's Avatar Indefinitely Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    19,146

    Default Re: Mathematical opinions: serious stuff this time

    No need for being there, there are books too. Given that I myself have a pretty suspended judgement on the issue of the lecture, I wanted to hear anything that comes to your mind. But my judgement would be, that the issue of brain wave frequencies there is not as you portray it, a "mundane" matter. There is an attempt of modelization which substitutes previous knowledge of Talamic pacemakers, for example, and several other things.

    Anyway, free thoughts, if you have them.

  4. #4

    Default Re: Mathematical opinions: serious stuff this time

    I don't get how this is novel, different "states of consciousness" (more appropriately the ones discussed here would be called "states of mind" but alright) have always been thought to have different frequencies when represented on an EEG or any oscilloscope voltage plot. I guess thinking of it as a chaotic system is a new touch, but this was already common sense. The brain isn't exactly consistent.

    The entire "synchronization" part didn't make any sense to me, did they mean they were trying to synchronize the attractors?

  5. #5
    Ummon's Avatar Indefinitely Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    19,146

    Default Re: Mathematical opinions: serious stuff this time

    As far as I can tell, they are stating that the attractors merge under certain circumstances as well. It is difficult to tell judging from a powerpoint, thus I have ordered the old book of his and another too. It seems he is suggesting there is a special kind of chaos in place as well. I cannot judge before a more thorough look.

  6. #6

    Default Re: Mathematical opinions: serious stuff this time

    Quote Originally Posted by Ummon View Post
    I think most of the mathematical premise of this lecture is derived from this: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freea...number=1686930

    Oscillations in Certain Nonlinear Driven Systems
    Herr, D.L.

    This paper appears in: Proceedings of the IRE
    Publication Date: June 1939
    Volume: 27, Issue: 6
    On page(s): 396- 402
    ISSN: 0096-8390
    Current Version Published: 2006-09-06

    Abstract
    The development of the theory of nonlinear oscillating systems has given rise to some rather intractable nonlinear differential equations. The formerly used isoclyne method of solution is inadequate for the solution of the equation of the nonlinear system producing relaxation oscillations under the influence of an impressed periodic force. In this paper, using the specific example of a triode oscillator with impressed sinusoidal electromotive force, differential analyzer solutions of the governing diferential equation, are given. A brief study of the phenomena of automatic synchronization and frequency demultiplication is made on the basis of the nonlinear theory.

  7. #7
    Ummon's Avatar Indefinitely Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    19,146

    Default Re: Mathematical opinions: serious stuff this time

    + rep for the reference.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •