Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 22

Thread: Turks vs. Egypt?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Turks vs. Egypt?

    Who's better? And who's funner to play as?

  2. #2
    Lord de Lyonesse's Avatar Campidoctor
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Cornwall
    Posts
    1,790

    Default Re: Turks vs. Egypt?

    Definelty Egypt, depends what you class as "funny" i play as Egypt because i then help those Byzantines and the Portugese defeat Spain and the Moors plus the Byzantines to kill those Turks..
    Last edited by Lord de Lyonesse; November 22, 2008 at 05:30 AM. Reason: lol "funny"
    GSTK: Richard Trevelyan [47] - Lord of Lyonesse


  3. #3
    Semisalis
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    488

    Default Re: Turks vs. Egypt?

    Turks, I like their troops more and egypt is too far from other countries. However, I haven't ever played with Egypt. Because of the reasons above I never started an Egypt Campaign.

  4. #4
    eggthief's Avatar Praepositus
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    5,562

    Default Re: Turks vs. Egypt?

    the turks have a more interesting roster and position.

  5. #5

    Default Re: Turks vs. Egypt?

    I definitely choose Egypt before The Turks. Most of the players are pretending that Turks' janissari units are incredible, but somehow i don't like them. I like the starting position of Egypt more than Turks'. Anyway Egypt > Turks.
    Last edited by Jerk; November 23, 2008 at 03:06 AM.

  6. #6

    Default Re: Turks vs. Egypt?

    I prefer Turks or 'Seljuks' as the mod calls them as I'm fascinated with the history of that area. Ottoman empire ftw.

  7. #7

    Default Re: Turks vs. Egypt?

    Turks all the way imo, like jerk says, their Janissary units are great, the only problem with them is they don't have a huge selection in heavy cavalry, and the choice they do have, Qapaluku or w/e is great, but you can only get them late in the game. Their missile cavalry is good, and their artillery and janissarry troops are great, and they can be trained in cities. You can solve their heavy cavalry problem by hiring kwarezmian cavalry mercenaries and aremanian cavalry.
    ~~~~~~~~~~

  8. #8
    Inhuman One's Avatar Comes Limitis
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    12,587

    Default Re: Turks vs. Egypt?

    I really like the janissary archers myself, all janissary units look unique.

    The moors have christian guard as a different looking unit, egypt only has the standard muslim appearances. They really could use some special looking units.

  9. #9
    DAVIDE's Avatar QVID MELIVS ROMA?
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    ITALIA
    Posts
    15,811

    Default Re: Turks vs. Egypt?

    Egyptians... i m playin with them.. it's a show when i m chargin enemies as the Eorlingas!

  10. #10
    Skooma Addict's Avatar Campidoctor
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    A once glorious province of the Empire
    Posts
    1,735

    Default Re: Turks vs. Egypt?

    Fatimids are probably more fun but the Turks are more unique and interesting.

  11. #11
    gta_140's Avatar Libertus
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Denton/Texas
    Posts
    76

    Default Re: Turks vs. Egypt?

    I'd say Egypt. I just started a Campaign with them and made an army of Arab Cavalry and killed a full stack Spanish army of spearmen. Light calvary...sure lol

  12. #12

    Default Re: Turks vs. Egypt?

    I'd say Egypt. More fun and more interesting then the Turks to play.
    **ROMA SURRECTUM 2.0 RULES**

  13. #13

    Default Re: Turks vs. Egypt?

    I started 1 campaign with turks, their start is ugly like hell, big empire and bad settlements.But the thing make them be preffered to egiptians are they look fabulous.I always preffered catholics because they look wonderfull and turks are the most lovely units in all muslim area.

  14. #14

    Default Re: Turks vs. Egypt?

    Turks suck horribly in early campaign but total smack in late. If you play early, be prepared for lots of converting forts into cities.

    Imo I like Turks better, you get to be the underdog competing with byzantines and the superpower.

    Does really matter, I always ally the other one when I play because I united all Muslims
    بارد هذا المترجم هو رهيبة العربية

  15. #15

    Default Re: Turks vs. Egypt?

    Frederick pretty much summed it up, I like to play united muslims too, the only bad part about it is that when you ally with all the muslim factions, the mongols always go to war with the kwaz's and then the fatimids join in on the action and you have to be the mediator between them.
    ~~~~~~~~~~

  16. #16
    Naked Emperor's Avatar Centenarius
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    828

    Default Re: Turks vs. Egypt?

    I'd say the Turks because of their starting position
    No battleplan ever survives contact with the enemy
    - Field Marshall Helmuth Carl Bernard von Moltke -

    ____________________________________________________________

  17. #17

    Default Re: Turks vs. Egypt?

    Egypt. Mamluks are where its at.

  18. #18

    Default Re: Turks vs. Egypt?

    Quote Originally Posted by Iscariott View Post
    Egypt. Mamluks are where its at.
    Mamluks all the way!

  19. #19
    The Noble Lord's Avatar Holy Arab Nation
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Peshawar, Pakistan - Kabul, Afghanistan
    Posts
    7,809

    Default Re: Turks vs. Egypt?

    Definitely the Fatimids. They are one of the most beautiful factions out there and their architecture is gorgeous as well. The problem with the Turks is that they are not represented as they should be, you have the Seljuks as a Turkish faction and as one of their units is Janissary Heavy Infantry!!??...
    Its totally unhistorical and false to have Janissary as the Seljuk's infantry because we all know that Janissaries are Ottoman creation and they only started being used by the Ottomans long after Seljuks disappeared from the historical scene. I think it is the Broken Crescent that presented Turkish faction properly, you have The Turkish Sultanate which is the Ottomans, and you have The Great Seljuks. That's is the only proper way to have the Turkish faction represented.
    Therefore, I am definitely saying that my favorite Muslim faction is: FATIMIDS
    [IMG][/IMG]
    أسد العراق Asad al-Iraq
    KOSOVO IS SERBIA!!!
    Under the proud patronage of the magnificent Tzar


  20. #20

    Default Re: Turks vs. Egypt?

    Quote Originally Posted by The Noble Lord View Post
    Definitely the Fatimids. They are one of the most beautiful factions out there and their architecture is gorgeous as well. The problem with the Turks is that they are not represented as they should be, you have the Seljuks as a Turkish faction and as one of their units is Janissary Heavy Infantry!!??...
    Its totally unhistorical and false to have Janissary as the Seljuk's infantry because we all know that Janissaries are Ottoman creation and they only started being used by the Ottomans long after Seljuks disappeared from the historical scene. I think it is the Broken Crescent that presented Turkish faction properly, you have The Turkish Sultanate which is the Ottomans, and you have The Great Seljuks. That's is the only proper way to have the Turkish faction represented.
    Therefore, I am definitely saying that my favorite Muslim faction is: FATIMIDS
    I agree with the Seljuks think, seriously weren't they like the predessors to Kwarezmians? IMO should just call it Turks if not Ottomans
    بارد هذا المترجم هو رهيبة العربية

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •