http://thefutureofthings.com/news/57...h-usb-3-0.html
Wow.... just.... just wow.
http://thefutureofthings.com/news/57...h-usb-3-0.html
Wow.... just.... just wow.
Wow sounds great!
Not sure why I need it but I do.
I'm plugging my keyboard into that, once you can start buying it...
... o.O And their backwards compatible with USB 2.0 and 1.1!
:O
>>>>> METAL BLOGGGGGGGG <<<<<
I <3 Student Loans
EVGA GTX580 1.5GB GPU
AMD Phenom II 955BE C3 3.2GHz @ 19c idle
16GB G.skill 1600MHz RAM DDR3
Corsair Force 3 60GB SSD, 150GB Velociraptor, 2x2TB Storage Drives
Corsair TX650W PSU
Asus 2x24" Vertical Monitors + 1 Sony EX500 46" LCD TV
Corsair Obsidian 800D
Bell FiberOP Internet 70mbps DOWN 30mbps UP
haha you could almost put a videocard on that theoretically, it seems to be about 600 MB per second bandwidth (unless my math at 8:20 am is totally off which i wouldn't be surprised) which is faster the PCIe 2x
I'll believe it when I see it. The USB council has promised so much in the past a lot of which has been misleading and simply untrue.
If it is true you will only see these numbers when transferring from one USB3 device to another USB 3 device, moving data from a conventional hard drive is limited to the interface which is currently 300mb's.
Meh that's the theoretical bandwidth divide it by ten to get the real world bandwidth......
Under the Honoured Patronage of Quintus Maximus Adopted by Valus
Bestows Patronage upon NobleNick
The superior man, when resting in safety, does not forget that danger may come. When in a state of security he does not forget the possibility of ruin. When all is orderly, he does not forget that disorder may come. Thus his person is not endangered, and his States and all their clans are preserved.
Well a quick look at maths revels that the actual bandwidth and transfer rate is around 357mb's per second, which is believable considering the massive gains achieved by SSD hard disks this year. The theoretical bandwidth stated in the article is 5Gb's per second.
----------------------
Edit: maths based on 25gb file (see article) @ 70 seconds.
1000 megabytes s per Gigabyte
25x1000 = 25,000/70 = 357mb's a second
or
25x1024 = 25600/70 = 366mb's
Last edited by Freddie; November 13, 2008 at 11:29 AM.
yes hard drive read and write speeds are a pretty huge issue, i see it as better for peripheral devices that require high bandwidth.
Sorry for my bad English, but "backwards compatible" means that I will be able to plug a USB 3.0 device into a USB 2.0 motherboard? Even if this is true, I guess the transfer speed would suffer a bit, right?
pft boring I don't want it anymore.![]()
Jesus. Who actually needs to transfer that much data?
I have Esata but to get the best speeds you need a good control card and they cost £30/£40 a throw cheap ones on ebay just don't cut it. I currently get around 80mb's write and 90mb's read.
Firewire 400 isn't much faster then USB 2, Firewire 800 is about as fast as esata but a firewire 800 control card costs a bomb and are quite hard to find. USB 3 could be anwser we people like myself have been waiting for.
yes still 90mbs per second is still quite adequate, like go do soemthing else for 5 minutes on transfer unless your breaking in and robbing a company of secret data a few minutes less on enormous transfers rarely made shouldn't be a huge deal worth big money to fix.
yeah i thought FireWire was gonna start being the future since it could connect directly between two devices and didn't require a host. (of course USB 3.0 might not either)
btw congrats GED on ur new award!
Under the patronage of Lord Condormanius (12.29.08)"Yes, I know why the leaf is turning yellow. Its a lack of chloroform."
I got an award??