Brown calls for "truly global society"

[bigfootedfred]

Brown calls for new world order
Prime Minister Gordon Brown believes the world financial crisis offers the opportunity to establish a "truly global society". Mr Brown will use a high-profile speech in the City of London to say that Britain, the US and Europe should join together to provide leadership in the creation of a "stronger and more just international order".

"The transatlantic relationship has been the engine of effective multilateralism for the past 50 years.
"As America stands at its own dawn of hope, so let that hope be fulfilled through a pact with the wider world to lead and shape the 21st century as the century of a truly global society.

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/4/20081110/...r-dba1618.html

Brown, who has spearheaded calls for the reform of international financial institutions,
said that Britain, the United States and Europe are key to forging a new world order.

"if we learn from our experience of turning unity of purpose into unity of action,
we can together seize this moment of change in our world to create a truly global society."
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/22/20081110...43a8d4f_2.html

Intersting.

The Summit on the 15th of this month should be very intersting indeed.
Many think countrys such as china and russia will 'serve notice' so to speak to the west about their intentions of much more equal partnership with the EU and north america in setting economic policy.

Also the latest slew of economic data is all very gloomy.
What are the likley topics of the summit on the 15th?
And are we looking and a much more bi-polar world?

[The King Of Peasants]

"As America stands at its own dawn of hope, so let that hope be fulfilled through a pact with the wider world to lead and shape the 21st century as the century of a truly global society.

Just like the last century...

Only two things are limitless the universe and human stupidity though I'm not sure about the former
-To paraphrase Einstein.

[Mikelus Trento]

I wonder if the Chinese and Indians want to foster this idea, or if their interests are better served by fostering competitive economic spheres?

There are arguements to made for both options.

[Martin N]

Yeh hes calling for The new world order. Illuminati Scum

[The King Of Peasants]

Martin this all happened twice actually with the LoN and the UN. But its still smart to look for government agents behind your mailbox.

[bigfootedfred]

Martin this all happened twice actually with the LoN and the UN.

the problem with the league of nations and its successor the UN for the people that promote and push globalization.
is that some nation states still had the veto power, and of course there own financial power.
What would work is several blocks, for example the EU, North America.
As these two areas are very much financially tied together and as this trend continues, it becomes harder and harder to divide them on policy and how they operate.
A sort of, world financial system therefore, would be much better for those who support globalization than a political one like the UN. Imagine UN sanctions with about 50x the effect.

i dont know if i buy the 'conspiracy theorys'. but you can look at whats going on and there is most certainly a push for globalization.

ron paul states it very well i think.
this was back in the debates for the republican nomination

[Da Skinna]

20th century a global society? More like an end to decolonization and a shift from military imperialism to economic neo-imperialism...

And Ron Paul hits one out again with that.

I am for a UN with big balls.

[Martin N]

I dont see how its conspiracy to be honest, its been admitted for 20-30 years now they wanted a new world order, people just label it as conspiracy, Theyve admitted to dumbing us down with fluoride in our water, admitted to giving it to kid, admitted to steralysing us, admitted to wanting to kill 80% of the population, admitted to 1 world government, admitted to everything, but when it comes out they label it as conspiracy, its ridiculous.

[bigfootedfred]

you gotta keep in mind that just going by one source of information is not what you should be doing.

The truth is almost always somewhere in the middle.
Alternative media does offer some fact, but i am wary of it as large amounts of it are simply profiting from peoples fears.
youve got to look between the lines. dont blindy believe what goverments and official news says no, but dont blindly believe anything else either.

I dont think the people who want globalization and control are evil, anymore than the romans were 'evil'. Power is the goal, the objective.
And that is what is being admitted to in the roundabout sort of way politicains always do. Filling in the blanks and calling things is what others do. but it dosent mean they are right.
Im not saying its all false, but a fair amount of it probably is not true, or only partially true.
You have to remeber the source of power and wealth for these people are you and me. the taxpayer.
what sense would it make to wipe out 80% of us.

[Martin N]

They dont want more money,They have all the money in the world, they want more power as you say, our world is overpopulated as it is, wipe 80% of us out secretly, say for example of the mercury they use in our jabs, fluoride, all the gmo food, then in the end, microchip us, and they have ultimate power, i dont see why they would need to do this, They must be ing insane but its happening, There are documents being released, There are people in the new world order (CFR,trilateral, home office) bragging about it all over the news, i mean theres even politicians calling for a new world order right now, there making there move. Weve had all these years to stop them, weve had our time, now its theirs, now the private banks are under control, They stage an economic collapse, Call for "new global monetary order" and you know what that means, 1 world government.

[El Brujo]

The NAFTA Superhighway is part of this. Practically everyone in Texas was opposed to it, so they just stopped reporting about it and the public forgot about it since it wasn't in front of their faces. Meanwhile the project continues.

[Da Skinna]

The NAFTA Superhighway is part of this. Practically everyone in Texas was opposed to it, so they just stopped reporting about it and the public forgot about it since it wasn't in front of their faces. Meanwhile the project continues.

Power of the media, eh?

[Martin N]

Well yeh, They wont listen to us peons good sir, Theyll just tell you that its a conspiracy Of course the nafta highway is what will link canada/USA/mexico IE North American Union, Im hoping to emigrate, but im not sure where, i dont think anywhere is free from these scum, i was hoping hawaii or australia but they will be blocking airports soon

[El Brujo]

Theyll just tell you that its a conspiracy

This is true. I listened to Ned Holmes, the chairman of TxDOT, talk about the project at a town hall meeting. But when I tried to tell other people about it they told me to stop believing silly conspiracy theories.

[Panzerbear]

yet British did not enough to even integrate with European Union. what a bunch of nonsense and hypocricty...

oh wait, let me guess, a truly global society under British govt ?

[Martin N]

No such thing as a government anymore, the most powerful men and politicians in the world form the new world order, they discuss the wars and how to run the world and there countries, they meet up, at bohemian grove, its funny Alex jones got inside bohemian grove and recorded it, was well funny they worship some kind of pagan type satan with a owls head LOL, im very serious here, its prolly on youtube, ill find it out and put it in.

Ah i could only find google video, 111 minutes o.0 just let it load and skip the beginning.

+ Google Video

This is true. I listened to Ned Holmes, the chairman of TxDOT, talk about the project at a town hall meeting. But when I tried to tell other people about it they told me to stop believing silly conspiracy theories.

Yes, you question anything government/news tell you, Your a nutjob, Your a conspiracist, But what they forget to tell you is, most likeley they reported what you said on there news station, or the government admitted it, You stand up to whoever calls you names like these, You record what goes on in meetings like this, you gatherv evidence yourself, and you show people what kind of men these are, People who stand up to them are patriotic, not conspiracists, People who defend freedom deserve better than the treatment they receive

[Erik]

yet British did not enough to even integrate with European Union. what a bunch of nonsense and hypocricty...

oh wait, let me guess, a truly global society under British govt ?

My thought exactly.

The fact it's just Brown (all by himself) calling for this "new world order" says enough.

I think Europe has had enough of Britain.
Time to look for a new world order consisting of mainland Europe, Russia, India and China. - sorry, no bankrupt countries allowed.

[Martin N]

I think britain would do well outside the EU

If Britain did leave the EU it would leave behind an incompetent and power hungry bureaucracy which has consistently failed. If they left the EU they would not be able to do anything in revenge. Remember they have a trade deficit with the EU. (For example, they have a deficit of over £3 billion a year trade with Germany alone.) The EU countries desperately need there trade.

British politicians have supported the EU, lied and deceived the British voters and signed away rights and freedoms and they have claimed that they wanted Britain to have influence in Europe. This is nonsense.
Britain has far less influence in Europe than it had ten, twenty or thirty years ago.
Politicians have sold out the voters to gain personal political influence.
Britain, and the British, have gained nothing from membership of the EU. But membership has cost a great deal.

The people of Norway and Switzerland have voted against joining the EU - and have thrived. Greenland, once in the EU, escaped and has prospered since getting out. If they can do it so can Britain.
Britain would survive and prosper outside the EU. It would be richer and more powerful. And its citizens would regain their lost independence.
Britain's trade is in surplus with every state in the world except the EU. If Britain left the EU it could regain power of its legal system, armed forces, and agricultural policies. Hundreds of thousands of small businesses would be saved from stifling bureaucracy. English is the worlds leading business language. English dominates the Internet. There language means that they can trade with any other country in the world.

[Panzerbear]

British is the worlds leading business language. British dominates the Internet.

silly me. I didnt know that Americans speak "British" .

There language means that they can trade with any other country in the world.

knowing English language (because it is one of the most easiest languages to learn due to overly simplified grammar) is not enough to be economically / financially succesful.

[Lord de Lyonesse]

silly me. I didnt know that Americans speak "British" .




knowing English language (because it is one of the most easiest languages to learn due to overly simplified grammar) is not enough to be economically / financially succesful.

Well technically most millionaires recognise English as a good boost in earning money "Finanacially succesful" however in another 30 years or so i feel that Chinese (Mandarin) will be the language to learn.