Story
Is that really that offensive? I'm just asking is that really "negative?"A new Obama ad released Thursday repeatedly links McCain to President Bush’s economic policies, showing the two Republicans in the rearview mirror as the car drives past McCain’s tax proposals.
“The most amazingly bankrupt line I’ve seen in this campaign is Barack Obama campaign’s repeated attempt to link John McCain to President Bush,” Davis said on a conference call with reporters. “John McCain held the Bush administrations feet the fire more than anyone else for the first four years of the administration.”
If there're talking about the ad where they have the McCain quotes and then he says he'd have to look to his VP candidate to handle economic issues...“Barack Obama hasn’t been held accountable time and time again,” Davis said. “In the last two weeks, he has attacked Sarah Palin and thrown the George Bush card back on the table.”
That's an attack on Sarah Palin? And is that ad really that "negative?" It's not like McCain even partially tried to indirectly imply that Palin was knowledgeable on economic issues. So isn't it relevant that if he's quoted as saying he might have to look to his VP for economic advice then he should've picked someone with knowledge of economic issues...he didn't.
How is it "off limits?" Palin brought up Khalidi, what is the press not supposed to mention that McCain oversaw $400K+ being given to an organization started by Khalidi?“If you bring up his association with William Ayers or Rashid Khalidi it’s, ‘Oh boy, that’s off limits; you can’t do that,’
Are they not suppose to question the hypocrisy of suggesting ONLY Obama "pals around with terrorists" when Ayers has connections to other Republicans?
Like who? The Rothschild who said Obama was an elite? Joe Wurzelbacher who asked Obama how his plan would help a hypothetical business? Someone who for some strange ideological esoteric reason supports McCain even though Obama's plan would benifit him more? The guy who said a vote for Obama was "death to Israel?"Davis insisted that Obama has yet to be fully scrutinized because every person who has offered criticism of the candidate has not been fully heard before coming under fire from the campaign.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
What do you guys think? Does this sound like whining? Does anyone think that Obama's ads have been as "negative" as McCain's?




Reply With Quote








