http://fr.news.yahoo.com/64/20081022...e-acb1c83.html
Are you agree with Sarkozy about the fact that eurozone should have a strong leader during the crisis period or the next EU leader should be still the Czech Republic?
http://fr.news.yahoo.com/64/20081022...e-acb1c83.html
Are you agree with Sarkozy about the fact that eurozone should have a strong leader during the crisis period or the next EU leader should be still the Czech Republic?
Légion étrangère : « Honneur et Fidélité »
Give it to Britain, we are the ones who pioneered and made the plans for the bank bailouts, we know what we're doing.
Really its not his descision. If he wants to stay till 2010 he needs to persuade the Czechs and whoever's after them to stand aside. And he'd need to convince Europe that he's the best man for the lengthened job.
In short, however much he wants to, I doubt he'll be allowed.
No. The terms should be done as they're planned. Even if Italy was up next.![]()
"At a football club, there's a holy trinity - the players, the manager and the supporters. Directors don't come into it. They are only there to sign the cheques."Have you ever seen Dirty Harry Guns and money are best diplomacy
Bill Shankly
"Not badly, considering I was seated between Jesus Christ and Napoleon"
David Lloyd George was pleased with his performance at Versailles.
Sarkozy! Czar of Europe!
it would be nice if EU citizens could elect their president for once
Hammer & Sickle - Karacharovo
And I drank it strait down.
Oh, but the anti-eu crowd would hate that! It can't be allowed!
And on topic: Sarkozy should just understand that he isn't some sort of mighty European leader. He just happened to have the chairmanship at this specific time. Why would he be any more qualified than anyone else for that matter? Until some sort of new way for the EU to work is agreed upon by all there is simply no way that the EU could do anything like that without upsetting people from even the pro-eu camp.
Errhm, Schroeder is still the lapdog of the Russians working for Nordstream. Prodi I'd rather not have as President, his last run a prime minister in Italy wasn't exactly faultless and Blair is the lapdog of the US. But errhm why must it be from one of the big three, why not a recognized statesman overall. Be it from a Smaller country or a medium sized one. Aside from that I agree with you. =)
Last edited by StarDreamer; October 22, 2008 at 04:47 PM.
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." -Albert Einstein
https://www.politicalcompass.org/ana...2.38&soc=-3.44 <-- "Dangerous far right bigot!" -SJWs
Sarkozy wasn't an mighty European leader but it was the first real EU president with the statut of world leader and not only an national president who has the charge of the EU presidency.
I think that the continuation of his leardership and his competences will be necessary in this critical crisis.
Légion étrangère : « Honneur et Fidélité »
Some day I'll actually write all the reviews I keep promising...
You see, we disagree a bit. The only reason Sarkozy has gotten any sort of fame is not because of his leadership or his competences, but more so because of the circumstance(time of financial crisis, Georgia) and his uninhibited ambition.
So while a good leader with some influence behind him would be good in this time of crisis. Sarkozy while being able to do stuff fast, seems to be a man that does before he thinks. I'd rather have a calmer, better administrator and recognized statesman. Not a hot-headed impulsive guy like Sarkozy. He is too power hungry for him to be given more power through special arrangements.
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." -Albert Einstein
https://www.politicalcompass.org/ana...2.38&soc=-3.44 <-- "Dangerous far right bigot!" -SJWs
French kings have a historical tendency to examine the guillotine from the wrong angle.Set up France with him as king?