Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 41

Thread: ATI 4870 = not so good...

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default ATI 4870 = not so good...

    Ok, after nearly 2 months of waiting I finally got my new computer:

    E8400 3.00ghz, 2 GB ram, Windows Vista home premium service pack 1 & Windows XP pro service pack 3, ATI powercolor 1GB 4870, drivers updated as of earlier today, 700 watt PSU and plenty of ventillation.

    Here's whats bugging me... The reason for buying a new computer primarily was to be able to play medieval 2 total war on maximum settings, maybe even modding it so that the armies are larger still. So you can imagine my frustration now that I have the new machine and I can barely see any improvement at all. Infact, with everything turned to maximum and with a battle of 6000 troops of the feild it runs pretty bad considering.

    Theres nothing wrong with the computer itself because it can handle the likes of Crysis (demo version) on HIGH/VERY HIGH combination. Medal of Honour airbourne runs like a dream on full settings, as does age of empires 3 and sims 2 (most of the time)

    But for games like Medieval 2 and Rome total war, it's pitifull. I would have thought a card/machine such as this could handle both games without fail. It seems neither game was meant to be played at absolute maximum, which is stupid really.

    Is anyone else having similar experiences? Or am I missing something?:hmmm:
    If deception is an art, then the world is full of artists!
    Trust No One!

  2. #2

    Default Re: ATI 4870 = not so good...

    I warned you

    Strange, I can get around 12'000 soldiers on max settings and stay above 20FPS. and thats with my 4850.

    No idea whats going on on your end.
    Last edited by Wheelchair; October 21, 2008 at 07:46 PM.
    >>>>> METAL BLOGGGGGGGG <<<<<

    I <3 Student Loans
    EVGA GTX580 1.5GB GPU
    AMD Phenom II 955BE C3 3.2GHz @ 19c idle
    16GB G.skill 1600MHz RAM DDR3
    Corsair Force 3 60GB SSD, 150GB Velociraptor, 2x2TB Storage Drives
    Corsair TX650W PSU
    Asus 2x24" Vertical Monitors + 1 Sony EX500 46" LCD TV
    Corsair Obsidian 800D

    Bell FiberOP Internet 70mbps DOWN 30mbps UP

  3. #3

    Default Re: ATI 4870 = not so good...

    I think it is needed that all of the major Basement tecchies should gather to discuss on this, I think we are being a bit too lax in recommending cards and ignoring the cons of some. First it was Wheelchair, then it was Legion, and now you. There is something wrong with those cards...

  4. #4
    madscientist22's Avatar Tiro
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    University of Southern California, California, USA
    Posts
    236

    Default Re: ATI 4870 = not so good...

    All the reviews I have read give favorable ratings to the new 4800 series, especially Tom's Hardware. Most sites say that ATI has succeeded in creating a graphics card that is truly dedicated to playing games...
    Intel Core i7 920
    Asus P6T Deluxe X58
    EVGA Geforce GTX 260 Core 216 896MB
    OCZ Gold (3x1GB) DDR3 1600

  5. #5

    Default Re: ATI 4870 = not so good...

    Quote Originally Posted by madscientist22 View Post
    All the reviews I have read give favorable ratings to the new 4800 series, especially Tom's Hardware. Most sites say that ATI has succeeded in creating a graphics card that is truly dedicated to playing games...

    I still find it too often that we receive complaints about thse cards. maybe there was a bunch of bad batches or something...

  6. #6

    Default Re: ATI 4870 = not so good...

    that! My Radeon 4850 is frieking awesome, it can play crysis with everything on very high and I have had no problems in anything with it.
    Last edited by Hounf of Culan; October 21, 2008 at 09:36 PM.
    "Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam." -Hannibal Barca
    http://&#91;IMG]http://img52.imageshack.....png&#91;/IMG]

  7. #7
    Thanatos's Avatar Now Is Not the Time
    Moderator Emeritus

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    33,188

    Default Re: ATI 4870 = not so good...

    You're doing something wrong, then. I have a 4870, and it runs everything just fine.

  8. #8
    H_man's Avatar Decanus
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    596

    Default Re: ATI 4870 = not so good...

    Where are you adjusting your AA and ASF settings? On the driver or ingame? I find tinkering with those helped significantly increase the performance on my 1900XTX. Medieval 2 is far more processor intensive than graphic card intensiver. Are you certain it's not your CPU/mobo?

  9. #9
    Thanatos's Avatar Now Is Not the Time
    Moderator Emeritus

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    33,188

    Default Re: ATI 4870 = not so good...

    It HAS to be his CPU/mobo. I have everything on M2TW totally turned up to the MAX, and I don't get any lag whatsoever.

  10. #10
    Freddie's Avatar The Voice of Reason
    Patrician

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    9,534

    Default Re: ATI 4870 = not so good...

    Th OP is a bit vague I suspect you were expecting to much of a performance leap over your old Computer.

    My Spec's:
    C2D E6400 @ 3.05Ghz
    2Gb Ram
    GeForce 8800GT 512MB

    Now last night I played RTW (with SPQR) on max with 10,000+ men and my computer was struggling like mad. I wasn't running FRAPS to measure the frame rate but I would suspect it was around 10 fps (very jerky).

    And don't blame your video card, the 4870 is going as fast as you CPU allows it to go. Your CPU is probably being held up by having to preform large amounts of A.I calculations, also the RTW and M2TW engines aren't multithreaded so only one of your CPU cores is being used.

  11. #11

    Default Re: ATI 4870 = not so good...

    Quote Originally Posted by Freddie View Post
    Your CPU is probably being held up by having to preform large amounts of A.I calculations, also the RTW and M2TW engines aren't multithreaded so only one of your CPU cores is being used.
    process manager tells me RTW and MTW2 use both of my CPU cores...
    A big THANKS to all Total War modders

    Visitor13 came to TWC for the wafers

  12. #12
    Freddie's Avatar The Voice of Reason
    Patrician

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    9,534

    Default Re: ATI 4870 = not so good...

    Quote Originally Posted by Visitor13 View Post
    process manager tells me RTW and MTW2 use both of my CPU cores...
    No, your process manager is reporting the game using one of the cores and windows apps in the background operating on the other.

  13. #13

    Default Re: ATI 4870 = not so good...

    Quote Originally Posted by Freddie View Post
    No, your process manager is reporting the game using one of the cores and windows apps in the background operating on the other.
    Ah, ok. So is there any simple way of telling that a game is using both cores?
    A big THANKS to all Total War modders

    Visitor13 came to TWC for the wafers

  14. #14
    Freddie's Avatar The Voice of Reason
    Patrician

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    9,534

    Default Re: ATI 4870 = not so good...

    Quote Originally Posted by Visitor13 View Post
    Ah, ok. So is there any simple way of telling that a game is using both cores?

    Well yes use the Process tab, if a game is using both cores the CPU usage should be at 98% to 100%. In RTW and M2TW total CPU usage would be around 50% to 55%.

  15. #15
    Giorgos's Avatar Deus Ex Machina
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Larissa/Skiathos Hellas(Greece)
    Posts
    5,557

    Default Re: ATI 4870 = not so good...

    I have an ATI 4870x2 and with everything turned to the max, full sized armies, its smooth sailing. I have no idea what goes on with you mate...


  16. #16
    Radiso-FIN's Avatar Campidoctor
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,538

    Default Re: ATI 4870 = not so good...

    Well I have GeForce 9800 GTX
    and I can play M2TW with max settings and battles including 10 000 men.
    Yesterday I played Broken Crescent, there were over 10 000 men on the battlefield and fps was over 20.

  17. #17

    Default Re: ATI 4870 = not so good...

    There are two computers in my house, one has an ATi 1900XTX card and the other has an ATI HD 2900X card, both can play M2TW on max settings quite easily and smoothly with up to 7000 men, after that you always get lag due to the limitations of the game engine. The 2900 can also play crysis and warhead on the highest settings with x2 AA with 25fps or so. If your paying hundreds of pounds more for the latest model then it ought to run a 2 year old game just fine. Are you sure you updated the drivers correctly? Sometimes the ATI drivers don't install correctly, make sure you use the installation manager. There are also some features in the catalyst control center that give you virtually no improvemnt in image quality and absolutly kill performance in some games such as temporal AA or some of the extra optional settings.

  18. #18

    Default Re: ATI 4870 = not so good...

    Sounds like basic-ATi-quality.


  19. #19
    Friend
    Moderator Emeritus

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Beautiful America
    Posts
    8,626

    Default Re: ATI 4870 = not so good...

    Ok, so many people say they can run M2TW with "max" settings and no lag problems, I have a question.

    Are you running 8x Adaptive Antialiasing and Extreme shadows + high vegetation detail?

    I know that extreme shadows with high vegetation detail kills my performance (X1900XTX), and adding 8x Adaptive Antialiasing on to that it's hard to believe even a 48xx could run it without any problems, at least looking at a forest. (of course, I can put max settings all the way up and play a 8000 man battle on grassy flatland, without lag, when I look away from the army...)


    Retired moderator of TWC
    | Under the patronage of Atterdag

  20. #20
    Thanatos's Avatar Now Is Not the Time
    Moderator Emeritus

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    33,188

    Default Re: ATI 4870 = not so good...

    Quote Originally Posted by Garnier View Post
    Ok, so many people say they can run M2TW with "max" settings and no lag problems, I have a question.

    Are you running 8x Adaptive Antialiasing and Extreme shadows + high vegetation detail?

    I know that extreme shadows with high vegetation detail kills my performance (X1900XTX), and adding 8x Adaptive Antialiasing on to that it's hard to believe even a 48xx could run it without any problems, at least looking at a forest. (of course, I can put max settings all the way up and play a 8000 man battle on grassy flatland, without lag, when I look away from the army...)
    Yes. When I say max, I do mean max.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •