Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: Russian Fleet 'may leave Ukraine'

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Erebus Pasha's Avatar vezir-i āzam
    Moderator Emeritus

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Leicestershire, UK
    Posts
    9,335

    Default Russian Fleet 'may leave Ukraine'

    Russia fleet 'may leave Ukraine'
    By Mark Franchetti
    BBC Panorama reporter and Sunday Times Moscow correspondent


    Russia's deputy PM has told the BBC the country's Black Sea Fleet will vacate its naval base in Sevastopol in 2017 if the Ukrainian government demands it.
    Speaking exclusively to Panorama, Sergei Ivanov said Russia would seek to renew its lease on the Crimean port, but will move the Fleet if it cannot.
    The move will anger nationalists who consider Sevastopol a part of Russia.
    It is feared the port could become a flashpoint in already strained relations between Russia and the West.



    Asked if he could envisage the Fleet not being based in the Crimea - its home for the last 225 years - Mr Ivanov, Prime Minister Vladimir Putin's number two who oversees Russia's military and industry, said:
    "Yes I can imagine that easily after 2017. Why not, if the Ukrainian government then in power decides not to prolong the lease?"
    It will also surprise the West where in the wake of the war in Georgia many fear Moscow could seek to reclaim parts of the Crimea by force to secure the Fleet's future.

    Mr Ivanov however dismissed such claims as Cold War-style propaganda and gave Russia's strongest assurances to date that it has no territorial ambitions.
    "We are not aggressive," said Mr Ivanov. "We have recognised the territorial integrity of all former Soviet republics. That was in 1991. Russia, of course, has no territorial ambitions regarding any former Soviet countries."


    "We are not going to start a war or attack any country. Right now, in fact, Russia does not fight any war at all. If you analyse how many wars the United States and Britain are fighting - it's quite different," he added.
    The future of the Black Sea Fleet in Sevastopol is a sensitive and emotional issue for most Russians.
    The Crimea was handed over to Ukraine during Soviet times when the transfer was a mere legal technicality - and no-one envisaged the collapse of communism and Ukraine's subsequent independence from Moscow.

    In Sevastopol, most locals feel closer to Moscow than Kiev, the Ukrainian capital.
    They would like to see the peninsula returned to Russia and are bitterly opposed to the possibility of the Black Sea Fleet leaving. Some would be prepared to take up arms to prevent that from happening.



    Asked what would happen if the Ukrainian government kicked out the Fleet after 2017 despite strong local opposition, Mr Ivanov, who spent 20 years in the KGB and was defence minister for six years, said:
    "I love Crimea and even have relatives there but that is Ukraine's problem, not Russia's."
    Despite the conciliatory tone, which comes as Russia seeks to rebuild its relations with the West in the wake of the war in Georgia, Mr Ivanov mounted a robust defence of Russian action in the tiny state and strongly criticized Nato's expansion eastwards.

    He also dismissed America's claims that its plans for a missile defence shield in Europe are to protect it from Iran and North Korea.
    He said Russia sees the shield - parts of which are to be stationed in Poland and the Czech republic - as a threat to Russia.
    Mr Ivanov warned that Russia would react militarily if the plans went ahead, but also rubbished a previous threat made by a Russian general who said Poland was exposing itself to a possible nuclear strike if it agreed to station parts of the shield on its territory.


    "Russia will definitely react, because we can't just not react," said Mr Ivanov, who as a teenager spent several weeks studying English in London.
    "A new potential military will in several years be present, very close to our borders, only 300 kilometres away. But that doesn't mean of course that we are planning a new nuclear attack on the Czech Republic or Poland. That's total rubbish."
    "There are still many Cold War warriors. Many Brits and Americans who still think that all Russians are drunk and treacherous, and that we spend our time thinking how to attack the West. That's part of old-style Cold War propaganda. There's too much mistrust. The wall should go. That's my favourite Pink Floyd song."

    Mr Ivanov's message reflects the general mood in Russia - which Monday's Panorama seeks to test.
    Nearly 20 years since the end of the Cold War, Russians feel let down by the West. Gone is the early euphoria. Instead most Russians now feel encircled by the West as a result of Nato's enlargement and are convinced the West wants Russia to be weak.
    They also feel misunderstood by the West and argue that we are the true Cold War warriors, not them.


    Many abroad vilify Mr Putin - who led Russia as president for eight years and remains its most powerful man despite stepping down and becoming prime minister. By contrast he is genuinely popular among most Russians. In the wake of the war in Georgia, relations between Russia and the West are at their lowest since the collapse of the Berlin Wall. Talk of a new cold war is exaggerated but as our investigation demonstrates, far from narrowing, the gulf in understanding between East and West is deepening.
    "Yes Russia is in many ways its own worst enemy," said Vladimir Pozner, a Soviet propagandist during Communist times who is now one of Russia's sharpest commentators.
    "But there are far too many things the West does not get about Russia. Most of all it does not want to understand that if you are a country which has never had democracy in its entire history then you cannot expect it in the space of 15 or 20 years to go 'Bingo - we're now democratic'. It's going to take generations. This country is still run by people who grew up in Soviet times."


    "Give this country a break. Let the Russians evolve and don't put that much pressure on them because if you do you'll bring out the worst. You'll bring out the super patriots who will say: 'You see, we told you can't trust the West'."
    It is a warning echoed less diplomatically by one of Mr Putin's greatest admirers - Nikita Mikhailkov, the most powerful figure in Russia's film industry who is a personal friend of the prime minister.
    "You don't like me, Englishman," he told Panorama. "You haven't liked me for centuries, but I respect you. I want to engage with you, but on equal terms. I want you to respect me as I respect you."
    "Russia must be respected, not least because it's strong and can answer back. It can say no, you want to talk let's talk. You want to fight, let's fight. But then don't complain."
    Panorama: Should we be scared of Russia? is broadcast on BBC One on Monday 20 October at 8.30pm (1930 GMT).

    Story from BBC NEWS:
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/h...pe/7677152.stm

    Published: 2008/10/18 23:59:24 GMT

    © BBC MMVIII
    Well just as Sergei Ivanov states in the article the Russian Black Sea Fleet would be prepared to leave it's home at Sevastopol if they fail in the future to agree on a further lease of the port with the Ukrainian Government. But although the Russian tone is conciliatory, it may anger nationalists who regard Sevastopol as being a part of Russia, and not the Ukraine, and would be prepared to resist any move to end the lease.

    What do all think?

    The article also goes into familiar territory regarding Russia's current relations with the west over issues such as the missile defence shield and the Georgian conflict. Should we really be scared of Russia or should we learn not to be so mistrustful of them (in other words start recovering from our cold war hang ups)?
    Last edited by Erebus Pasha; October 20, 2008 at 10:02 AM.

    www.ottomanhistorypodcast.com/
    Under the patronage of the Noble Savage.

  2. #2

    Default Re: Russian Fleet 'may leave Ukraine'

    1. There is no reason why Ukraine would NOT renew the Sevastopol lease.

    2. This is a fairly shrewd political move on Russia's part; chucking the ball into Ukraine's court and forcing her to make a solid political statement using Sevastopol as both the bait and the hammer. The Russian political machine is and has been for the past three decades been very unsure as to the exact political dependability and positioning of the Ukrainian government, and this particular gesture is geared at dissipating that smoke.
    Last edited by Mithie; October 20, 2008 at 10:07 AM.

  3. #3

    Default Re: Russian Fleet 'may leave Ukraine'

    Seems like a smart statement by Russia on many lvls.

    If Ukraine do not want Russian forces in the country then Russian forces shud not be in Ukraine.

    But i wonder how Russia would react if a portion of the population rebelled and Ukraine sent forces in to restore order.

    As for the comment about the missel shield. The shield is in no way a treat to Russia. And more then anything els the shield is a waste of money.

  4. #4

    Default Re: Russian Fleet 'may leave Ukraine'

    I think basing a Fleet there is pretty silly from a military point of view.

    What I mean is, it's primary area of operations has to be the Med, and secondary the Black Sea. And to get to the Med it has to transit the narrow Bosporus?

    Maybe in the age of sailing ships, but in todays world it seems unsound.
    "oooh a gypsy wind is blowing warm tonight, sky is starlit and the time is right. Now you're telling me you have to go...before you do there's something you should know." - Bob Seger

    Freedom is the distance between church and state.

  5. #5

    Default Re: Russian Fleet 'may leave Ukraine'

    Quote Originally Posted by Mikelus Trento View Post
    I think basing a Fleet there is pretty silly from a military point of view.

    What I mean is, it's primary area of operations has to be the Med, and secondary the Black Sea. And to get to the Med it has to transit the narrow Bosporus?

    Maybe in the age of sailing ships, but in todays world it seems unsound.
    The Black Sea is surrounded on three sides by ex-Soviet states, and Turkey, to the south, which is a popular projection point for NATO forces.

    It's in Russia's strategic interest to maintain a military presence in the Black Sea. The Black Sea Fleet is also one of the top 5 reasons why Turkey doesn't impose a monopolistic tariff on the Bosporus.
    Last edited by Mithie; October 20, 2008 at 12:08 PM.

  6. #6

    Default Re: Russian Fleet 'may leave Ukraine'

    Quote Originally Posted by Mithie View Post
    The Black Sea is surrounded on three sides by ex-Soviet states, and Turkey, to the south, which is a popular projection point for NATO forces.

    It's in Russia's strategic interest to maintain a military presence in the Black Sea. The Black Sea Fleet is also one of the top 5 reasons why Turkey doesn't impose a monopolistic tariff on the Bosporus.
    In peace time I would agree with everything you said.

    In wartime though, if Turkey as a member of NATO didn't close down that choke point, the United States would. The Russian fleet tooling around the Black Sea doesn't really influence a war with the United States at all. When they get into the Med they do.
    "oooh a gypsy wind is blowing warm tonight, sky is starlit and the time is right. Now you're telling me you have to go...before you do there's something you should know." - Bob Seger

    Freedom is the distance between church and state.

  7. #7

    Default Re: Russian Fleet 'may leave Ukraine'

    Quote Originally Posted by Mithie View Post
    The Black Sea is surrounded on three sides by ex-Soviet states, and Turkey, to the south, which is a popular projection point for NATO forces.

    It's in Russia's strategic interest to maintain a military presence in the Black Sea. The Black Sea Fleet is also one of the top 5 reasons why Turkey doesn't impose a monopolistic tariff on the Bosporus.
    More like on 2 sides, actually, since Romania and Bulgaria weren't part of the Soviet Union (maybe you meant eastern bloc?)

    But youre right in prinicple.

  8. #8

    Default Re: Russian Fleet 'may leave Ukraine'

    In wartime though, if Turkey as a member of NATO didn't close down that choke point, the United States would. The Russian fleet tooling around the Black Sea doesn't really influence a war with the United States at all. When they get into the Med they do.
    The Black Sea fleet has enough boom booms to make a second Bosporus should that be an issue.

    ... But I don't forsee a NATO-Russian war any time in the future.

  9. #9

    Default Re: Russian Fleet 'may leave Ukraine'

    They broke the record for the longest reaching Nuke and the longest reaching submarine Nuke.
    That's... not something to be proud of, in the interests of humanity.

  10. #10

    Default Re: Russian Fleet 'may leave Ukraine'

    I think they also set the record for the biggest one sinking in the shallowest amount of water.
    "oooh a gypsy wind is blowing warm tonight, sky is starlit and the time is right. Now you're telling me you have to go...before you do there's something you should know." - Bob Seger

    Freedom is the distance between church and state.

  11. #11
    Mythre's Avatar Jack of all trades,
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Colorado, USA
    Posts
    7,678

    Default Re: Russian Fleet 'may leave Ukraine'

    Even if a war did break out, the Black Sea fleet would have a purpose. It could shut down or at least highly hinder an trade in the region and it would help guard against a southern invasion by NATO, at least by sea. NATO would have to commit a good bit of resources to smash the fleet. It would at the very least, act as a deterrent.
    A wise man in times of peace prepares for war. -Horace
    GSTK: King Geoffry Wilson III - 35















    A wise man in times of peace prepares for war. -Horace
    In war, numbers alone confer no advantage. Do not advance relying on sheer military power. - Sun Tzu
    "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." -Santayana

  12. #12

    Default Re: Russian Fleet 'may leave Ukraine'

    Quote Originally Posted by Mythre View Post
    Even if a war did break out, the Black Sea fleet would have a purpose. It could shut down or at least highly hinder an trade in the region and it would help guard against a southern invasion by NATO, at least by sea. NATO would have to commit a good bit of resources to smash the fleet. It would at the very least, act as a deterrent.
    I don't think NATO looks on 1 nuke dismantling a holed up fleet to equal a good bit of resources.
    "oooh a gypsy wind is blowing warm tonight, sky is starlit and the time is right. Now you're telling me you have to go...before you do there's something you should know." - Bob Seger

    Freedom is the distance between church and state.

  13. #13
    Mythre's Avatar Jack of all trades,
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Colorado, USA
    Posts
    7,678

    Default Re: Russian Fleet 'may leave Ukraine'

    Nuclear war would be suicide. If war ever comes, nukes will not be a part of it. If nukes do become part of it, it does not classify as war but as the end of humanity.
    A wise man in times of peace prepares for war. -Horace
    GSTK: King Geoffry Wilson III - 35















    A wise man in times of peace prepares for war. -Horace
    In war, numbers alone confer no advantage. Do not advance relying on sheer military power. - Sun Tzu
    "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." -Santayana

  14. #14
    Axeman's Avatar Praepositus
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Rotterdam, Netherlands
    Posts
    5,847

    Default Re: Russian Fleet 'may leave Ukraine'

    Its not like the Russians have a perfectly good naval base at Rostov or anything...

    ☻/ This is Muhammad.
    /▌  Copy and paste him
    / \ so as to commit horrible blasphemy!
    If there were a God, I think it very unlikely that he would have such an uneasy vanity as to be offended by those who doubt his existence. --Bertrand Russell

  15. #15
    YuriVII's Avatar Primicerius
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Texian Cossack Hetmanate
    Posts
    3,007

    Default Re: Russian Fleet 'may leave Ukraine'

    The new base will be probablly at the oil terminal Novorossisk. Also, I think those would be interested to know that Russia now has a new naval base at Tarsus in Syria. So now they have Mediterrenean base aswell.

  16. #16

    Default Re: Russian Fleet 'may leave Ukraine'

    Quote Originally Posted by YuriVII View Post
    The new base will be probablly at the oil terminal Novorossisk. Also, I think those would be interested to know that Russia now has a new naval base at Tarsus in Syria. So now they have Mediterrenean base aswell.
    And may they allow you to use it longer than the last time.
    "oooh a gypsy wind is blowing warm tonight, sky is starlit and the time is right. Now you're telling me you have to go...before you do there's something you should know." - Bob Seger

    Freedom is the distance between church and state.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •