direct link: http://br.youtube.com/watch?v=HG9dMKiDzC4
The video speaks for itself...
(Not that it matters, but I'm not Muslim)
Peace be upon you all,
Caesar
direct link: http://br.youtube.com/watch?v=HG9dMKiDzC4
The video speaks for itself...
(Not that it matters, but I'm not Muslim)
Peace be upon you all,
Caesar
Last edited by CaesarBR; October 13, 2008 at 01:56 AM.
Decent video. All religons etc. can and have been be misinterpreted and put to the use of those seeking political etc. domination.
Chris
Nice movie.
Notice, that if Mohammed had killed the unbeliever without anger, everything was fine.
He just quoted you the New testament...besides read revelation...?
Shock...so was I and every Muslim...and anyhow, only the good things are taught. Children are/(or at least were) brought up being taught that everyone's equal,
etc. etc. Also Muslim values.love thy neighbour, forgiveness etc etc - christian values.
You don't see the head of the Muslim council of Britain doing that either.U dont see the arch-bishop of canterbury calling down god's wrath upon the infidel muslims....
believe i should get hold of the dispatches undercover mosque (episode 1 and 2!)..a genuine undercover videoing of a mosque praised by the UK government as being tolerant and modern etc etc - uncovered as a centre of extremist preaching (so if thats one of the more liberal mosques god/allah help us)
Carach, have you ever been to Central London mosque?
That story is about Ali ibn abi Talib, cousin and son in law of Muhammad (saws).Notice, that if Mohammed had killed the unbeliever without anger, everything was fine.
Last edited by Serious Spamurai; October 13, 2008 at 08:06 AM.
Notice, that if Ali ibn abi Talib had killed the unbeliever without anger, everything was fine.
Perhaps because the 'unbeliever' (who was one of the best warriors among the Makkahn Mushrikeen), Amro bin Abduwad, had offered a challenge (as was common in battles at the time). Ali (one of the best warriors in the Muslim army) stepped forward saying "Oh Amro do not boast off too much about your bravery and man-hood. The one who has the power and energy to fight you is standing before you", ibn Abduwad didn't want to fight him claiming: "You would better turn back I do not like to kill you because I was a friend of your father." to which Ali replied ""By God, I like killing you". Ibn Abduwad climbed down from his horse and charged Ali.
Basically, it was (a) in a battle and (b) a duel.
Indeed, war exists. It is also quite unavoidable wherever interests are conflicting beyond a certain degree. Finally, it is also very much ubiquitous.
The real issue is how much you can encourage it given that it is already so widespread.
the new testament certainly doesnt :/
and anyhow, only the good things are taught. Children are/(or at least were) brought up being taught that everyone's equal, love thy neighbour, forgiveness etc etc - christian values. U dont see the arch-bishop of canterbury calling down god's wrath upon the infidel muslims....
thats a poor counter man, going back 600-1000 years in history when times were just a little bit different.
we're talking about the here and now. One religion has changed over the past 500 years for the better, to become modern and tolerant (relatively), the other has remained in the middle ages and thus continues to be extreme in nature. Were islam to be a bit more flexible there wouldnt be this debate, many of the problems that currently exist in the world as the result of religious extremism and intolerance would not exist.
"I have need to be all on fire, for I have mountains of ice about me to melt." -William Lloyd Garrison
"The end may justify the means as long as there is something that justifies the end." -Leon Trotsky
"Therefore I am not in favour of raising any dogmatic banner. On the contrary, we must try to help the dogmatists to clarify their propositions for themselves. Thus, communism, in particular, is a dogmatic abstraction; in which connection, however, I am not thinking of some imaginary and possible communism, but actually existing communism as taught by Cabet, Dézamy, Weitling, etc. This communism is itself only a special expression of the humanistic principle, an expression which is still infected by its antithesis – the private system. Hence the abolition of private property and communism are by no means identical, and it is not accidental but inevitable that communism has seen other socialist doctrines – such as those of Fourier, Proudhon, etc. – arising to confront it because it is itself only a special, one-sided realisation of the socialist principle."
Marx to A.Ruge
Oh God, the irony! Anyway.... U dont see the arch-bishop of canterbury calling down god's wrath upon the infidel muslims....
Matthew 10:34-37
Do not think that I came to bring peace on the earth; I did not come to bring peace, but a sword.* For I came to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother in law. A man's enemies will be the members of his household. He who loves father or mother more than Me is not worthy of Me; and he who loves son or daughter more than Me is not worthy of Me.**
*Also translated as division
**Also translated as he who does not hate his father or mother is not worthy of Me; and he who does not hate his son or daughter is not worthy of Me
I know you said 'taught', but if you want to get real, what most children are taught has little to do with biblical grounding -- or rather, not in the New Testament. Kind of like what jihadists preach has little to do with Quranic grounding.
Ah yes, the old 'Islam has not changed in the last 500 years and is one monolithic extreme entity' argument that reveals little more than the ignorance of the one who utters the phrase.One religion has changed over the past 500 years for the better, to become modern and tolerant (relatively), the other has remained in the middle ages and thus continues to be extreme in nature. Were islam to be a bit more flexible there wouldnt be this debate, many of the problems that currently exist in the world as the result of religious extremism and intolerance would not exist.
What's funny is that doctrinally, the Catholic Church has not changed in the last 500 years, nor the last 2000.
Last edited by motiv-8; October 13, 2008 at 10:39 AM.
does anyone use the old testament these days?
ive certainly never been given a copy (only ever new T)....
but hey, considering the vast majority of people arent really christian (i know they are officially.. but what they practise is another thing) anyway.... its a pretty poor counter to say that christianity's evil.
Uh, actually, every Protestant denomination I've seen has used the Old Testament almost exclusively in sermons. I've yet to see a sermon that actually covers specific teachings of Jesus as related by the Gospels.
Well, well, now you are the judge of who is Christian and who isn't, are you?but hey, considering the vast majority of people arent really christian (i know they are officially.. but what they practise is another thing) anyway.... its a pretty poor counter to say that christianity's evil.
Regardless, yes it's a 'poor counter' to say Christianity is evil (everything is a poor counter to you, it seems), but it's a pretty good response to the equally poor assertion that 'Islam is evil'.
Last edited by motiv-8; October 13, 2008 at 10:42 AM.