Newsweek and the problem with the liberal media

[Heinz Guderian]

Another way that the liberal media is promoting Obama and hating on Sarah Palin. Thanks to Fox News for pointing this out.

"ya cant really see on the fullscreen, but trust me (there's a problem)....trust me."

"again people are gonna have to trust us, ya cant see it on television".

The large woman (with the education) just doesnt understand like the skinny pretty ones who probably dont need to rely on "books" and like that.

Do you think the liberal media is really trying to dump on Sarah?

[C-Rob]

Both Fox and anything liberal suck.

Wtf, yeah, I can't see anything wrong with that cover on TV. I think the skinny little is just being that, a . And of course, fat chick too is stupid.

[TestudoAubreii]

I wouldn't exactly call Fox News "liberal media." It's mainstream media, but I don't think that it is liberal.

morrisonicus

[Heinz Guderian]

I wouldn't exactly call Fox News "liberal media." It's mainstream media, but I don't think that it is liberal.

morrisonicus

until they have an icon of Jesus Christ being crucified in the top right corner of the screen, its liberal to me.

[Gaidin]

until they have an icon of Jesus Christ being crucified in the top right corner of the screen, its liberal to me.

This says everything we need to know about whether your opinion is worth considering regarding 'liberal media'.

[Rapax]

I wouldn't exactly call Fox News "liberal media." It's mainstream media, but I don't think that it is liberal.

morrisonicus

Newsweek supposedly is. Read the OP.

What a bunch of BS though. Fox really has to fill their air time somehow, even if it's about subjectively unflattering Cover pictures.

[danzig]

It is rather bleh issue but it IS an issue that has come in alot by whiners on both sides. Remember people ed when Obama was shown in Kenyan dress as somehow being insulting to him? Plus combine this with the Mccain photo where the photographer *admitted* she set it up so Mccain would look menacing, old and you get an issue of complaint...not one worthy of much thought but one regardless. I blame Time magazine for this and the infamous OJ Simpson photo years ago for starting this entire thing

[Plan C]

Facial hair... pores... Jeeez, big deal...

Also, hasn't she heard of makeup? Posh spice has pores like swiss cheese and still manages to look good for cameras.

[danzig]

Facial hair... pores... Jeeez, big deal...

Also, hasn't she heard of makeup? Posh spice has pores like swiss cheese and still manages to look good for cameras.

Things like that are usually done by the photographer...she is a politician not a washed up no talent pop star like Posh spice. Only John Edwards has a 24/7 professional makeup/hair team I think

[Astaroth]

I have watched many different channels from many different countries, ranging from CNN over the main German channels (ARD, ZDF etc) up to BBC and such, but what I keep seeing and hearing about FOX news coverage is just shocking.

No TV channel is flawless, even the most serious and best journalists make mistakes, even the most professional channels can be biased.

But FOX is just on a whole different level. Not only do they constantly show very biased things (trying to throw mud at Barack Hussein Obama constantly etc) and keep discussing totally irrelevant issues for hours (He must be a muslim, I'm sure!), they also apparently have nothing worth showing. If that is what one of the biggest news channels in the USA is like, then I feel sad for the people who watch it.

Seriously, they actually complained because Sarah Palin's photo on the cover of a magazine wasn't edited to make her look more favourably? In a live coverage? Don't they have anything better to do?

[Frédéric Chopin]

Calling Fox News liberal makes about as much sense as calling it "fair and balanced."

[Heinz Guderian]

Calling Fox News liberal makes about as much sense as calling it "fair and balanced."

Do you see the crucified Christ? Do you see it? I'm looking at the top right....no...its not there.

*sigh, only Rapax got this in one go. Probably Danzig too.

[Rapax]

*sigh, only Rapax got this in one go. Probably Danzig too.

Well come on, it's pretty confusing. "Liberal Media" and then a video of Fox News? Totally makes your head spin unless you actually read what the post says

[Heinz Guderian]

Well come on, it's pretty confusing. "Liberal Media" and then a video of Fox News? Totally makes your head spin unless you actually read what the post says

lol. iloveyouweshouldbefriendsandhavecoffeeimnotgay

[Каие]

Dear God, I knew Fox was that bad...but not that bad. I mean sometimes I seriously feel sorry for FOX viewers.

[Kiljan Arslan]

What the ? I've seen them put pictures of other politicians just as large on their cover!

[Rapax]

The same skinny blonde had another interesting piece, which gives you an idea of the relevance the issues have she covers:



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eaUxugH2LgI

[MadBurgerMaker]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eaUxugH2LgI

The guy that keeps cutting in there with his little comments and is more annoying than the retarded anchor chick and whatever stupid garbage they're talking about on the show.

[Rapax]

The guy that keeps cutting in there with his little comments and is more annoying than the retarded anchor chick and whatever stupid garbage they're talking about on the show.

I know, that's his deal. You kinda get used to it after a few segments. He does the same for CNN though, if anyone was worrying about a bias.

[Viking Prince]

The problem is media. Being liberal or conseervative is simply a bias for the current issue of the day.

Coverage is still of the herd, by the herd, and for the herd. Being on the left or right side of the herd is not an issue.