Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 31

Thread: International Panic over Piracy Controversy

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Tajir's Avatar Vicarius
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    USA!
    Posts
    2,925

    Default International Panic over Piracy Controversy

    http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/20...t_10130741.htm

    Ok, this topic is slightly different from the other piracy topics.

    Today, it was fully uncovered through documents on the ship found by pirates that the recently-seized Belize-flagged Ukrainian vessel was headed towards Kenya with the intention of further moving the equipment to South Sudan's SLPA rebels - who are under a weapons embargo.

    Its of course no surprise that, despite the fact that these tanks are supposedly Ukrainian - Russia and the US are in extreme panic mode.

    My guess is that the US bought the old tanks from the Russians and is planning on giving them to the SPLA rebel army. However, just like Kenya is being used as a vessel to smuggle, the US/Russia are using neutral Ukraine contacts to get the weapons to the destination.

    Kenya will be in deep crap along with those other named states for allowing their ports to be used as a smuggling point.



    Your views?


  2. #2

    Default Re: International Panic over Piracy Controversy

    Quote Originally Posted by Dahir View Post
    Its of course no surprise that, despite the fact that these tanks are supposedly Ukrainian - Russia and the US are in extreme panic mode.
    Could it just be that they don't want a battalion* of main battle tanks going just...anywhere?

    *What is that really...about half a battalion, or so? Gruntspeak. Whatever.
    Last edited by MadBurgerMaker; September 29, 2008 at 01:19 AM.
    (Patron of Lord Rahl)











    Quote Originally Posted by Hahahaha David Deas
    Thinking about it some more, perhaps losing to the the Jags and the Colts really will come as a complete surprise to you.

  3. #3

    Default Re: International Panic over Piracy Controversy

    Why do you use the Chinese State news agency, surely a more credible source can be found.

    Today, it was fully uncovered through documents on the ship found by pirates that the recently-seized Belize-flagged Ukrainian vessel was headed towards Kenya with the intention of further moving the equipment to South Sudan's SLPA rebels - who are under a weapons embargo.
    Wrong, according to the BBC:

    Its of course no surprise that, despite the fact that these tanks are supposedly Ukrainian - Russia and the US are in extreme panic mode.
    Well, duh. We don't know who the Somali Pirates will sell the tank too, it's bad for the stability of many 3rd world countries if a battalion of tanks suddenly made it into the hands of their Rebels.

    My guess is that the US bought the old tanks from the Russians and is planning on giving them to the SPLA rebel army.
    Why buy the Tanks from Russia, considering that America could easily ship their own Tanks using arms dealers as middle men? They've done it before, in other conflicts.

    However, just like Kenya is being used as a vessel to smuggle, the US/Russia are using neutral Ukraine contacts to get the weapons to the destination.
    Please, this post smells like Somalian Piracy apologetics and conspiracy theories.

  4. #4

    Default Re: International Panic over Piracy Controversy

    A Chinese state news agency purporting to uncover weapons smuggling into Sudan? They could look alot closer to home for the same story.

  5. #5
    Claudius Gothicus's Avatar Petit Burgués
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Argentina
    Posts
    8,544

    Default Re: International Panic over Piracy Controversy

    I wonder what the hell are going to do the pirates with thirty or so tanks.

    They could gave them a better use than ransom them for money.

  6. #6
    Erik's Avatar Dux Limitis
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Amsterdam
    Posts
    15,653

    Default Re: International Panic over Piracy Controversy

    Quote Originally Posted by Burnum View Post
    Why buy the Tanks from Russia, considering that America could easily ship their own Tanks using arms dealers as middle men? They've done it before, in other conflicts.
    South Sudan owning American tanks would look a lot more suspicious than them owning old Russian tanks.

    America initially equipped Osama Bin Laden with Russian, instead of American, weapons for the same reason.
    It took them a whole lot more time before they dared to equip the Muslim fundamentalists with Stinger rockets.

    But I'm highly skeptical abut this story as well.



  7. #7
    Farnan's Avatar Saviors of the Japanese
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Right behind you starring over your shoulder.
    Posts
    31,638

    Default Re: International Panic over Piracy Controversy

    Quote Originally Posted by Erik View Post
    South Sudan owning American tanks would look a lot more suspicious than them owning old Russian tanks.

    America initially equipped Osama Bin Laden with Russian, instead of American, weapons for the same reason.
    It took them a whole lot more time before they dared to equip the Muslim fundamentalists with Stinger rockets.

    But I'm highly skeptical abut this story as well.
    We would buy the tanks from old munitions places in countries like Albania, Poland or the Baltic States...aka nations that wouldn't have anything to gain by ratting us out and making us look bad.
    “The nation that will insist upon drawing a broad line of demarcation between the fighting man and the thinking man is liable to find its fighting done by fools and its thinking by cowards.”

    —Sir William Francis Butler

  8. #8

    Default Re: International Panic over Piracy Controversy

    Quote Originally Posted by Erik View Post
    South Sudan owning American tanks would look a lot more suspicious than them owning old Russian tanks.

    America initially equipped Osama Bin Laden with Russian, instead of American, weapons for the same reason.
    It took them a whole lot more time before they dared to equip the Muslim fundamentalists with Stinger rockets.
    Except the US never equipped Osama Bin Laden....nice try with nonsense though.

  9. #9

    Default Re: International Panic over Piracy Controversy

    Money and arms were sent to the mujahideen in huge quantities. The sole conduit for this was Pakistan (since it couldn't be arranged via Iran obviously) and the body essentially in charge of it was the ISI. The ISI distributed this aid according to its own interests and predominantly to its client Gulbudin Hekmatyar. However, one of the organisations that worked with and received aid from the ISI was Al Qaeda. There were numerous other fundamentalist groups that were also involved, some of which have since merged into Al Qaeda. The CIA and other Western intelligence agencies were well aware of who was ultimately benefitting from the money and arms which they sent to be distributed at the discretion of the ISI, but did not consider it to be of any concern. So one cannot say the US armed Al Qaeda in the strict sense that it handed them weapons. However, it sent weapons to the ISI knowing but not caring whose hands they would end up in.

  10. #10
    Darsh's Avatar Maréchal de l'Empire
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    3,888

    Default Re: International Panic over Piracy Controversy

    Pirates will use the thanks such as submarines for launch undersea assaults.

    Légion étrangère : « Honneur et Fidélité »

  11. #11

    Default Re: International Panic over Piracy Controversy

    These tanks were dispatched by Russia and USA together, to create an atmosphere of fear. Fear of what you ask? Fear of return of communism. It has afterall been a generation since communism fell and the cold war ended. And the leaders don't like the fact that the new generation has forgotten what fear is. When they don't fear, they question. And when they question, someone must answer. And that can't be.

    The war on terror has died down, it is now a skirmish somewhere in the borderlands of civilisation. No one cares of it anymore. The ruling class requires another war, or fear of one, to cloud the minds of the people. They did this by first expanding NATO to border Russia, then they initiated the clash in Georgia which created fears of return of Russian imperialism. Now these task were dispatched into Africa to initiate another communist uprising, which will escalate into several quasi-wars between the seemingly hostile superpowers- all for the profits of the capitalist.

    The current depression which you might have heard of is simply another set of smoke and mirrors, made to confuse the everyday man of what is truly going on; and to, as always, create more profit for the ever-hungry capitalis pigs.


    All that stands in the way of their plans, is the brave and honorable Somali coastal guard.

  12. #12
    Viking Prince's Avatar Horrible(ly cute)
    Patrician Moderator Emeritus

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Colorado, USA
    Posts
    18,577

    Default Re: International Panic over Piracy Controversy

    Quote Originally Posted by Perkele View Post
    These tanks were dispatched by Russia and USA together, to create an atmosphere of fear. Fear of what you ask? Fear of return of communism. It has afterall been a generation since communism fell and the cold war ended. And the leaders don't like the fact that the new generation has forgotten what fear is. When they don't fear, they question. And when they question, someone must answer. And that can't be.

    The war on terror has died down, it is now a skirmish somewhere in the borderlands of civilisation. No one cares of it anymore. The ruling class requires another war, or fear of one, to cloud the minds of the people. They did this by first expanding NATO to border Russia, then they initiated the clash in Georgia which created fears of return of Russian imperialism. Now these task were dispatched into Africa to initiate another communist uprising, which will escalate into several quasi-wars between the seemingly hostile superpowers- all for the profits of the capitalist.

    The current depression which you might have heard of is simply another set of smoke and mirrors, made to confuse the everyday man of what is truly going on; and to, as always, create more profit for the ever-hungry capitalis pigs.


    All that stands in the way of their plans, is the brave and honorable Somali coastal guard.
    No basis in fact and no sources to back up assertions. CONSPIRACY!!!!!

  13. #13
    Axeman's Avatar Praepositus
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Rotterdam, Netherlands
    Posts
    5,847

    Default Re: International Panic over Piracy Controversy


    ☻/ This is Muhammad.
    /▌  Copy and paste him
    / \ so as to commit horrible blasphemy!
    If there were a God, I think it very unlikely that he would have such an uneasy vanity as to be offended by those who doubt his existence. --Bertrand Russell

  14. #14
    Darsh's Avatar Maréchal de l'Empire
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    3,888

    Default Re: International Panic over Piracy Controversy

    Quote Originally Posted by Axeman View Post

    +rep

    Légion étrangère : « Honneur et Fidélité »

  15. #15

    Default Re: International Panic over Piracy Controversy

    Satire, truly a lost art. To majority of readers, that is.

  16. #16
    Viking Prince's Avatar Horrible(ly cute)
    Patrician Moderator Emeritus

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Colorado, USA
    Posts
    18,577

    Default Re: International Panic over Piracy Controversy

    Quote Originally Posted by Perkele View Post
    Satire, truly a lost art. To majority of readers, that is.
    Could be the artist? Maybe?

  17. #17
    Tajir's Avatar Vicarius
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    USA!
    Posts
    2,925

    Default Re: International Panic over Piracy Controversy

    Ok, I admit all the facts aren't there, but is it hard to believe that the US might buy weapons from Russia and smuggle them to SPLA rebels?

    Here's the deal, I heard about this story two days before it was leaked. I heard it the day of the pirate attack.

    A South Sudanese friend, many in fact, were up in arms about how their peoples' leaders should have better friends in Mombasa, whom they can trust.

    Here, read this topic from a Sudanese forum if you want any further proof.

    http://sudanforum.net/showthread.php?t=38521

    I've lived in Kenya before and I can assure you that Mombasa, the destination port, has been used as an SPLA smuggling point for many years, even decades.


  18. #18
    Farnan's Avatar Saviors of the Japanese
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Right behind you starring over your shoulder.
    Posts
    31,638

    Default Re: International Panic over Piracy Controversy

    Quote Originally Posted by Dahir View Post
    Ok, I admit all the facts aren't there, but is it hard to believe that the US might buy weapons from Russia and smuggle them to SPLA rebels?
    So the US is going to buy weapons from a rival who would love to hurt their international image for a clandestine act?
    “The nation that will insist upon drawing a broad line of demarcation between the fighting man and the thinking man is liable to find its fighting done by fools and its thinking by cowards.”

    —Sir William Francis Butler

  19. #19
    Thanatos's Avatar Now Is Not the Time
    Moderator Emeritus

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    33,188

    Default Re: International Panic over Piracy Controversy

    Quote Originally Posted by Farnan View Post
    So the US is going to buy weapons from a rival who would love to hurt their international image for a clandestine act?
    Not likely, but I could see it happening.

  20. #20
    The King Of Peasants's Avatar Senator
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    1,373

    Default Re: International Panic over Piracy Controversy

    I congratulate you on the lack of propaganda but conspiracies aren't too much better...
    "July 14, 2008: I think this is a case where Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae are fundamentally sound. They're not in danger of going under. They're not the best investment these days from a long term standpoint going back. I think they are in good shape going forward. They're in the housing market. I do think their prospects going forward are very solid."
    -Barney Frank

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •