http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/21/we...ef=todayspaper
Long but good article from the New York Times on Iraq.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/21/we...ef=todayspaper
Long but good article from the New York Times on Iraq.
“The nation that will insist upon drawing a broad line of demarcation between the fighting man and the thinking man is liable to find its fighting done by fools and its thinking by cowards.”
—Sir William Francis Butler
:hmmm: A reference to Obama? Obama wants to pull them out, but he doesn't feel ready, eh...“If the next president changes the mission, then I have to figure out,” General Odierno said, stopping himself. “You know, whoever that may be.”
He's trying his best not to directly get involved in politics but its hard to do at his position...
“The nation that will insist upon drawing a broad line of demarcation between the fighting man and the thinking man is liable to find its fighting done by fools and its thinking by cowards.”
—Sir William Francis Butler
I don't see why he doesn't just say it straight...If it's a huge matter such as this, perhaps he should tell Obama privately...although Obama did say he'd listen to commanders on the ground.
“The nation that will insist upon drawing a broad line of demarcation between the fighting man and the thinking man is liable to find its fighting done by fools and its thinking by cowards.”
—Sir William Francis Butler
Is there a legal requirement? Soldiers aren't allowed to participate politically?
You are not allowed to publicly participate in politics while in uniform or while associating yourself with the US Military.
Its also why you will probably never see a picture of Senator Lindsey Graham in uniform (he is also a USAF Reserve Colonel who served in Iraq on Active Duty while a senator).
Last edited by Farnan; September 21, 2008 at 11:09 AM.
“The nation that will insist upon drawing a broad line of demarcation between the fighting man and the thinking man is liable to find its fighting done by fools and its thinking by cowards.”
—Sir William Francis Butler
Ah! No wonders, but from a military perspective it's clear he doesn't want to leave pre maturely, as Patreus said last week, the "Gains can be lost". I would say that was a hint...but the Iraqi government wants them out anyway within 3 years...by 2011.
^^^Sounds reasonable enough. I am sure by 2011 the Iraqi army should be able enough to keep Iraq under control.
Under the Patronage of Jom!
We all hope that of course, lets just hope nothing happens from here on that can drastically change anything. The Sunni Militia is onside, the Mehdi Army is sleeping and Al Qaeda is nearly gone.
If by "sleeping" you're implying that the Mahdi Army is so tactically and strategically broken as to be associated with the likes of Humpty Dumpty....Originally Posted by ЯoMe kb8
....then yes i'd have to agree with you.
I meant it had been ordered to abide by a ceasefire by it's leader.
Its spiritual 'leader' is in exile in Iran. The group has splintered to a point he has no control over anything really. Thus he called for a new Mahdi Army to be born just this summer.
Never happened.
The fascists of the future will be called anti-fascistsThe best lack all conviction, while the worst are full of passionate intensity
Do they have the bribe money?^^^Sounds reasonable enough. I am sure by 2011 the Iraqi army should be able enough to keep Iraq under control.
Swear filters are for sites run by immature children.