The Moral's of sex.

[Roman Clone]

Anyone notice that the air is full of smug?

Nope. Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide.

Very easy for people to say it's immoral to have sex outside of marriage when they themselves are not getting any.

No, because I acknowledge that the purpose of sex is for reproduction, not for pleasure.

That and it's easy to tell people not to do something when you secretly do it yourself as well.

Oh yes. I am 13 and having sex. Oh sure.

Often, the no-sex-before-marriage attitude is adopted because he cannot actually get sex anywhere. It is there to protect his ego; he is not postponing sex until marriage because he actually cannot attract a girl to have sex with but because it is now against his morals. See how it works?

Nope. That is complete nonsense. Do good morals not exist in people's heads these days?

[Shaun]

Nope. That is complete nonsense. Do good morals not exist in people's heads these days?

Yes they do, but people simply see nothing wrong with sex outside of marriage. Tell me something wrong with premarital sex, go on.

[Roman Clone]

Yes they do, but people simply see nothing wrong with sex outside of marriage. Tell me something wrong with premarital sex, go on.

1. STDs, you think someone is just going to tell you that they have an STD if they are going to have sex? I doubt it.

2. Accidental pregnancy.

3. Once again, morals. You people don't treat it for it's real reason.


Go ahead, have sex. Have threesomes, hell, have a whole gang bang. I don't care what you do, I am not you.

[Shaun]

1. STDs, you think someone is just going to tell you that they have an STD if they are going to have sex? I doubt it.

2. Accidental pregnancy.

3. Once again, morals. You people don't treat it for it's real reason.


Go ahead, have sex. Have threesomes, hell, have a whole gang bang. I don't care what you do, I am not you.

1) And you think your wife will if having an STD means she'll never get married?

2) And you think this cannot happen outside of marriage? You think two people need to be married to have kids?

3) We don't share your Victorian age morality. What is the real reason for sex?

[Roman Clone]

1) And you think your wife will if having an STD means she'll never get married?

2) And you think this cannot happen outside of marriage? You think two people need to be married to have kids?

3) We don't share your Victorian age morality. What is the real reason for sex?

1. At least she won't be spreading it to 1,000 people. If she isn't that honest in the first place, than she shouldn't even be married.

2. They should be married; because it wouldn't matter if one walked out during the pregnancy if there was no marriage.

3. Once again, REPRODUCTION.

[Kiljaden]

I'm gonna do the unforgivable: Quoting post 2 on page 1 of a 5-page thread without reading past post 2... lolol

1) And you think your wife will if having an STD means she'll never get married?

No, but I wouldn't marry the slut.

/thread

:laughing:

[Shadow8]

1. STDs, you think someone is just going to tell you that they have an STD if they are going to have sex? I doubt it.

2. Accidental pregnancy.

3. Once again, morals. You people don't treat it for it's real reason.


Go ahead, have sex. Have threesomes, hell, have a whole gang bang. I don't care what you do, I am not you.

WRAP IT UP!!!!!!!!!!

[HopliteElite]

Morals are not only strictly Christian or Jewish. Morals could, and should be practised by everyone, the world would truly be a better place. Also, are you saying you are glad you weren't taught morals in your youth?

The "moral" that you are espousing though, that of abstaining from sex until married is a moral that would not exist were it not for the Christian faith and others like it. You are obviously coming from a religious background, believing that abstinence is moral but you only think this because you have been conditioned to by a repressive religion.

I'm a bad example to espouse the fact that a person can be a very moral person, while engaging in pre-marital sex because I am not a moral person but I've known enough very good and ethical people that did not feel the need to keep it in their pants until marriage because a very old book tells them to.

[Pra]

WRAP IT UP!!!!!!!!!!

Too hard to resist:

[Shaun]

1) If she has an STD he/she should not be spreading it to anyone.

2) Yeah men walk out on woman when they're pregnant, married or not.

3) If sex was only for reproduction, then it wouldn't feel nearly as good as it does, and the female genitalia would not contain organs which are purely for sexual pleasure.

[Roman Clone]

1) If she has an STD he/she should not be spreading it to anyone.

2) Yeah men walk out on woman when they're pregnant, married or not.

3) If sex was only for reproduction, then it wouldn't feel nearly as good as it does, and the female genitalia would not contain organs which are purely for sexual pleasure.

1. I agree with that too.

2. But it's more likely that married people would go through it together, if you just did it with a woman and left her in the morning, then that's a problem.

3. There is a Christian explanation and a more logical one, although they don't interfere, I'm just going to list the more logical one. There is pleasure in sex because it allowed our ancestors to willingly reproduce, you wouldn't want children if it was going to hurt, would you?



Like I said, I'm not going to stop you, just use safety man.


______________________

Not to be rude. You're a virgin, correct? I mean... I just want to know the experiences that led you to this conclusion.

Yes. Like most, if not, all normal 13 year olds....

[removeduser_487563287433]

No, because I acknowledge that the purpose of sex is for reproduction, not for pleasure.

Not to be rude. You're a virgin, correct? I mean... I just want to know the experiences that led you to this conclusion.

[removeduser_487563287433]

Right, then how can you possibly say that sex is for reproduction rather than pleasure if you've never had sexual intercourse? Are you suggesting people only have sex as many times as the amount of children they have? How do you explain that I've had sexual intercourse more than a few times yet have not one child? What rational process has led you to conclude that sex is "for" reproduction, not pleasure. Why do you think sex has to be "for" something? Who says so? Why?

[Roman Clone]

Right, then how can you possibly say that sex is for reproduction rather than pleasure if you've never had sexual intercourse? Are you suggesting people only have sex as many times as the amount of children they have? How do you explain that I've had sexual intercourse more than a few times yet have not one child? What rational process has led you to conclude that sex is "for" reproduction, not pleasure. Why do you think sex has to be "for" something? Who says so? Why?

Sex is supposed to be for only when you love someone very much. Love is just not something (the deep kind, not like "I love this game!") you can go around and allow everyone to think they have yours. Doing it with everyone means that your word has very little meaning.

And some species, like our own, engage in sexual intercourse for pleasure that can't possibly result in reproduction. Bonobos, pygmy chimpanzees, for example, engage in anal and oral sexual intercourse, mutual :wub: in both homosexual and heterosexual contexts.

Aren't we smarter than them?

Regarding point number 3, all species use sex to reproduce despite many not getting any pleasure out of it at all.

They are animals, they don't have free will. They know it is necessary for the survival of their species.

[John I Tzimisces]

Sex is supposed to be for only when you love someone very much. Love is just not something (the deep kind, not like "I love this game!") you can go around and allow everyone to think they have yours. Doing it with everyone means that your word has very little meaning.

Spare us the pontificating, please.

[zznɟ ǝɥʇ]

Spare us the pontificating, please.

Holy crap, you just used 'pontificating' in a sentence. I'm in awe.

[Shaun]

Regarding point number 3, all species use sex to reproduce despite many not getting any pleasure out of it at all.

[removeduser_487563287433]

Regarding point number 3, all species use sex to reproduce despite many not getting any pleasure out of it at all.

And some species, like our own, engage in sexual intercourse for pleasure that can't possibly result in reproduction. Bonobos, pygmy chimpanzees, for example, engage in anal and oral sexual intercourse, mutual :wub: in both homosexual and heterosexual contexts.

[removeduser_487563287433]

Oh please... have some humility. All this talk about "love" from a thirteen year old. Why is sex "supposed" to be only for those whom you're in love with? Who says so? Why?

Incidentally only the more intelligent animals - bottlenosed dolphins, bonobos and of course humans can be shown to be having sex for pleasure alone. Sex for pleasure is associated with intelligence, not stupidity.

[Roman Clone]

Oh please... have some humility. All this talk about "love" from a thirteen year old. Why is sex "supposed" to be only for those whom you're in love with? Who says so? Why?

Incidentally only the more intelligent animals - bottlenosed dolphins, bonobos and of course humans can be shown to be having sex for pleasure alone. Sex for pleasure is associated with intelligence, not stupidity.

1. I still have a brain. Sex is a serious thing, it displays a bond between 2 people. Treating it for simply something you can do on the weekends is not how you should be treating it. That's like acting like a gangster/chav in front of a Monarch.

2. Because they can experience pleasure, but last time I checked, there are no courts down in the sea or African wilds, It doesn't really matter if they have offspring anyway because they are animals; that's what they're expected to do. I'm not saying it can't be done, I'm saying it shouldn't be done.