http://www.smashbros.com/en_us/characters/sonic.html
Sonic cannot be in a Nintendo game, that is completely unacceptable.
http://www.smashbros.com/en_us/characters/sonic.html
Sonic cannot be in a Nintendo game, that is completely unacceptable.
“The nation that will insist upon drawing a broad line of demarcation between the fighting man and the thinking man is liable to find its fighting done by fools and its thinking by cowards.”
—Sir William Francis Butler
Considering that Nintendo owns SEGA now, it's perfectly acceptable.
This is old news, Farnan.
Sega is not owned by Nintendo. Sega is owned by Sega Sammy Holdings which is a public listed company.
I have to say it is a bit funny seeing Sonic on a Nintendo console, all those years of bitter rivalry and school playground arguments over who was better, 'Nintendo or Sega', 'Mario or Sonic'.
I know I just found out...
I just remember playing Sonic as a kid, and for him to be trolloping around with low lifes like Mario is just unbelievable.
“The nation that will insist upon drawing a broad line of demarcation between the fighting man and the thinking man is liable to find its fighting done by fools and its thinking by cowards.”
—Sir William Francis Butler
- As cunning as a fox who's just been appointed Professor of Cunning at Oxford University -
Read my author bio!
Like my Facebook page!
New guides for ROTS and FOTS!
Please post feedback in the thread!
Professional mod disliker.
Writer for Android Rundown.
They are both giants in their own right. Whoever said you could only love one? Mind you, I only had SEGA stuff, and I still like both.
lol no u dont idort.
Also Farnan, I'd be more worried with the kind of fans Sonic has garnered, as well as the direction the games have been taking. They keep throwing in these silly new characters and taking it to really strange directions.
One upcoming Sonic Game has him able to transform into some sort of "Were Sonic" that has the gameplay feature hack and slash like Devil May Cry, and I think either that one or another one has Sonic with a Sword.
This is a non-issue, Farnan.
They've owned SEGA for a year or two now.
No, no they haven't.
http://www.sega.com/
Incredible Hulk, produced by SEGA, just came out for like every system.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sega
Wikipedia also confirms they are independent (they have a parent company, but it's not a software company)
ttt
Adopted son of Lord Sephiroth, Youngest sibling of Pent uP Rage, Prarara the Great, Nerwen Carnesîr, TB666 and, Boudicca. In the great Family of the Black Prince
Sonic and Mario at the Olympics anyone?
Sonic with a sword?
That is definately wrong.
Sonic is the first video game I really played, thus I hate this new stuff.
Why ruin a classic?
“The nation that will insist upon drawing a broad line of demarcation between the fighting man and the thinking man is liable to find its fighting done by fools and its thinking by cowards.”
—Sir William Francis Butler
I think I'm going to have to warn you for obscene content there.
“The nation that will insist upon drawing a broad line of demarcation between the fighting man and the thinking man is liable to find its fighting done by fools and its thinking by cowards.”
—Sir William Francis Butler
sonic with a sword is strange, doesn't make much sense.
I was always a SEGA fan back in the day and that just seems out of place. Though I will love to play this game to kick Marios ass with that character.
Swear filters are for sites run by immature children.
This is blasphemy! This is madness!
Sonic used to be one of my favourite characters, but I haven't seen a good Sonic game for years.