Knights of Tripoli and Edessa.

[Chaotix27]

They're awesome! Who else thinks that the Knights of Tripoli/Edessa are better than Knights of Jerusalem/Antioch? For one, they each have a more bada$$ color theme than their counterparts, and they have the same stats, except with AP maces! I wonder why the Jerusalem knights even bothered to fight with their wimpy swords when the Tripoli Knights could blast through everything with their maces. In conclusion, Tripoli/Edessan Knights are like Norse War Clerics with charging lances.

[Ex Tenebris Lux]

ok. no argument here. love em.

[Unwelcome Guest]

They are a bit better, that's why they're more expensive. Still not as good as Templars/Hospitallers.

[homefry]

Huh?

The Knights of Jerusalem have the armor piercing axes as melee weapons.

The Knights of Tripoli have the swords.

[Surgeon]

Antioch and Jerusalem have a sort of mirror-image relationship of their knights.

Knights of Antioch = swords
Knights of Edessa = AP axes

Knights of Jerusalem = AP axes
Knights of Tripoli = swords
Templar Confrere Knights & Constable of Jerusalem (IIRC) = AP maces

[Celsius]

I prefer Jerusalem. but thats just me