0.7 Campaign balancing feedback

**Lusted** · May 20, 2008, 03:57 PM

Please post any feedback on campaign balancing here.

**miki** · May 23, 2008, 02:21 PM

Hi Lusted,

Increased building costs are fine for me as they can make the campaing going a bit slower and you can't upgrade everything every turn. I'm beginning a Roman campaign and looks good.

**MCDS2** · June 13, 2008, 06:47 AM

the greeks destroy the macadonians in almost every campaign i've played!

**Lusted** · June 13, 2008, 08:15 AM

Interesting, seems like things have gone from Macedon always beating Greeks in 5.1 to the other way round.

**MCDS2** · June 14, 2008, 10:37 AM

Macadonia only beats the Greeks when the uses them!

**HeroSK** · September 02, 2008, 06:24 AM

Originally Posted by MCDS2

the greeks destroy the macadonians in almost every campaign i've played!

Same here, In my pontic campaign I tried to help them but I was fighting at to many fronts I couldnt save them...IMO, Greek Hoplite units are overpovered maybe reducing the stats may help..:hmmm:

**miki** · September 03, 2008, 06:41 AM

IMHO Macedonian needs an hipaspist unit - strong hoplite unit, short spears - for protecting the phalanx flands and for punch. It's historycal and can give the macs more chances to win.

**thebull0425** · February 10, 2009, 07:48 PM

Force Diplomacy?

Something to balance out the quick expansion of the factions. They seem to wittle down quickly, and leave a few remaining. That's my experience anyways.