View Poll Results: Ptolemaic or Seleucid?

Voters
25. You may not vote on this poll
  • Seleucid got the upper hand

    13 52.00%
  • Ptolemaic got the upper hand

    12 48.00%
Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Ptolemaic or Seleucid?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Mikail Mengsk's Avatar Primicerius
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Pisa, Italy
    Posts
    3,012

    Default Ptolemaic or Seleucid?

    Which takes the upper hand in your campaigns? For me, the Ptolemies , i0m sending tons of denarii to help the seleucids to survive and to hold the yellow fever until i've finished the Macedonians and the Greeks

  2. #2
    Delvecchio1975's Avatar Primicerius
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Taxandria
    Posts
    3,518

    Default Re: Ptolemaic or Seleucid?

    since this poll is in the platinum forums: seleucids, they ALWAYS beat the ptolemies, even if those sometimes gain the upper hand INITIALLY in Anatolia ..

    in my first campaign in ExRM3.3, it's the Ptolemies though ...

  3. #3

    Default Re: Ptolemaic or Seleucid?

    Quote Originally Posted by Delvecchio1975 View Post
    since this poll is in the platinum forums: seleucids, they ALWAYS beat the ptolemies, even if those sometimes gain the upper hand INITIALLY in Anatolia ..
    Can't confirm this. In my game, although I took the whole Asia Minor from the Ptolemies, they totally raped the Seleucids, only leaving them with 3 regions. They, being allied with Carthage form(ed) a worthy enemy for me

  4. #4
    AqD's Avatar 。◕‿◕。
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    🏡🐰🐿️🐴🌳
    Posts
    10,897

    Default Re: Ptolemaic or Seleucid?

    Ptolemaic sucks. Their units are typically more expensive but wear lighter armour; although they always pwn the seleucids......
    ________
    Side Effects From Avandia
    Last edited by AqD; September 20, 2011 at 06:55 AM.

  5. #5
    Delvecchio1975's Avatar Primicerius
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Taxandria
    Posts
    3,518

    Default Re: Ptolemaic or Seleucid?

    Quote Originally Posted by aqd View Post
    ... but wear lighter armour......
    well, it IS warm in Egypt, innit?

  6. #6
    Mikail Mengsk's Avatar Primicerius
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Pisa, Italy
    Posts
    3,012

    Default Re: Ptolemaic or Seleucid?

    Quote Originally Posted by aqd View Post
    Ptolemaic sucks. Their units are typically more expensive but wear lighter armour; although they always pwn the seleucids......
    but if in your campaigns the ptolemies won against the seleucids why didn't you vote them? :hmmm:

  7. #7
    AqD's Avatar 。◕‿◕。
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    🏡🐰🐿️🐴🌳
    Posts
    10,897

    Default Re: Ptolemaic or Seleucid?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mikail Mengsk View Post
    but if in your campaigns the ptolemies won against the seleucids why didn't you vote them?
    Seleucid has heavy-armoued pikes (gold shield), elite swordsmen and spearmen/javelinmen (hypaspists), heavy cavalry (xys...) and cataphracts/agema - They're very resistent to missiles and flanking.

    Seleucid's armies are real armies, but ptolemaic's are just as useless as gallic/germanic armies - all cannon fodders. A full stack of HAs or prodromoi can slaughter them all



    Quote Originally Posted by Delvecchio1975 View Post
    well, it IS warm in Egypt, innit?
    Yes it's warm and unsuitable for heavy armours (heat+armour affects stamina in rtw). But without armour they cannot resist javelins and arrows, and I'd just finish them from a safe distance rather than to have a fair fight
    ________
    BONG REVIEW
    Last edited by AqD; September 20, 2011 at 06:55 AM.

  8. #8
    Mikail Mengsk's Avatar Primicerius
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Pisa, Italy
    Posts
    3,012

    Default Re: Ptolemaic or Seleucid?

    Quote Originally Posted by aqd View Post
    Seleucid has heavy-armoued pikes (gold shield), elite swordsmen and spearmen/javelinmen (hypaspists), heavy cavalry (xys...) and cataphracts/agema - They're very resistent to missiles and flanking.

    Seleucid's armies are real armies, but ptolemaic's are just as useless as gallic/germanic armies - all cannon fodders. A full stack of HAs or prodromoi can slaughter them all
    Yes, but the question was not "who's better": i know the seleucids are far better. The question was: in your campaigns, who got the upper hands?

  9. #9
    AqD's Avatar 。◕‿◕。
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    🏡🐰🐿️🐴🌳
    Posts
    10,897

    Default Re: Ptolemaic or Seleucid?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mikail Mengsk View Post
    Yes, but the question was not "who's better": i know the seleucids are far better. The question was: in your campaigns, who got the upper hands?
    If I cannot interfere, Seleucid would definitely win because I have increased the value of silk by 35 times, and they happen to have many of the silk cities
    ________
    buy property in Pattaya
    Last edited by AqD; September 20, 2011 at 06:55 AM.

  10. #10

    Default Re: Ptolemaic or Seleucid?

    Quote Originally Posted by aqd View Post
    Seleucid's armies are real armies, but ptolemaic's are just as useless as gallic/germanic armies - all cannon fodders. A full stack of HAs or prodromoi can slaughter them all
    Heh cannon fodder?.. Ptolemaics vs Romans:



    HAs can slaughter everything if used well, but if 5000 Romans can't beat them then podromoi certainly can't also...


  11. #11
    Mikail Mengsk's Avatar Primicerius
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Pisa, Italy
    Posts
    3,012

    Default Re: Ptolemaic or Seleucid?

    In human's hands almost every faction could be great against the AI, but in fact the Ptolemaics don't have such a good army as the romans or the seleucids could have.

  12. #12

    Default Re: Ptolemaic or Seleucid?

    Current campaign as Rome, I have around 28 provs, but according to the info graphs, they Seleucids have more than 60!!.....this could be a tough campaign when we eventually, inevitably, have to butt horns..........

  13. #13

    Default Re: Ptolemaic or Seleucid?

    Cake or death?

  14. #14
    Quinn Inuit's Avatar Artifex
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Virginia, USA
    Posts
    4,968

    Default Re: Ptolemaic or Seleucid?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jamey View Post
    Cake or death?
    The cake is a lie!
    RTR Platinum Team Apprentice, RTR VII Team Member, and Extended Realism Mod Team Coordinator. Proud member of House Wilpuri under the patronage of Pannonian

    The ExRM forum: come for the mod, stay for the Classical History discussions. Or vice versa.

    My writing-related Twitter feed.

  15. #15
    GreatOne's Avatar Ordinarius
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Serbia
    Posts
    797

    Default Re: Ptolemaic or Seleucid?

    Your conqueror got killed?

    How sad


  16. #16

    Default Re: Ptolemaic or Seleucid?

    In every campain before this one i am playing now, the Seleuicds won...

    This time, i gave huge money to Pontus, Armenia, Parthia, and Bactria, and Ptolemaic, and but 30 years in, the Seleucids were toast... the Ptolemaic's pushed them into India, and took all of Asia Minor, and are fighitng thracians now west of Byzentin...

    I countered it by landing 5 stacks along the coast, took Alexandia and her sister cites, took the all the Islands, Antioch, and Gaza... all with no resistance... i have carved out a huge chunck of Ptolemaic power, as most of thier army is in India or in western Asia minor...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •