As some of you might know Queen Elizabeth 2 is visiting Turkey. She'll be listening to Qur'an and a Qur'an specially made will be represented to her. What are your thoughts on Queens visit and her interest in Islam?
As some of you might know Queen Elizabeth 2 is visiting Turkey. She'll be listening to Qur'an and a Qur'an specially made will be represented to her. What are your thoughts on Queens visit and her interest in Islam?
The Armenian Issuehttp://www.twcenter.net/forums/group.php?groupid=1930
"We're nice mainly because we're rich and comfortable."
I don't think she does have a specific interest in Islam... I mean, she is legally the head of the Church of England. She is also Head of State and perhaps the most experienced diplomat in the world. What do you expect her to do, throw the Qur'an back in their faces?
The Armenian Issuehttp://www.twcenter.net/forums/group.php?groupid=1930
"We're nice mainly because we're rich and comfortable."
She's being diplomatic thats all. I'm at least happy she's visiting us. Its always an honour to dignify a head of state, especially a Monarch.
According to the Theory of War, which teaches that the best way to avoid the inconvenience of war is to pursue it away from your own country, it is more sensible for us to fight our notorious enemy in his own realm, with the joint power of our allies, than it is to wait for him at our own doors.
- King Edward III, 1339
That Quran is going to sit in a dusty cardboard box along with shrunken heads, mummified panda penis, virgin's urine and other trinkets of barbaric religions.
Last edited by Big War Bird; May 14, 2008 at 06:53 AM.
As a teenager, I was taken to various houses and flats above takeaways in the north of England, to be beaten, tortured and raped over 100 times. I was called a “white slag” and “white ****” as they beat me.
-Ella Hill
In tribute to concerned friends:
- You know nothing Jon Snow.
Samples from the Turkish Cuisine by white-wolf
As a teenager, I was taken to various houses and flats above takeaways in the north of England, to be beaten, tortured and raped over 100 times. I was called a “white slag” and “white ****” as they beat me.
-Ella Hill
In tribute to concerned friends:
- You know nothing Jon Snow.
Samples from the Turkish Cuisine by white-wolf
As a teenager, I was taken to various houses and flats above takeaways in the north of England, to be beaten, tortured and raped over 100 times. I was called a “white slag” and “white ****” as they beat me.
-Ella Hill
A nation is a fictional shell of a grouping of human beings who live in a designated area, by ethnic, political or racial ties. Led by (self)elected leaders who do their actions out of name of the nation, which, according to them, is the designated area in which the grouping of human beings live even though, once again, it is nothing but a fictional categorising term for similair groupings of humans in designated areas. The humans (in their groupings) are often proud of their fictional categorising term for their grouping in a designated area and could take personal offense if someone insults their fictional categorising term, even though the fictiobal categorising term doesn't, cannot care.
Ergo, we are able to conclude that a nation, which is in effect a fictional shell for the government -which is also in effect a smaller grouping of leaders (and servants, paradoxically) within a grouping of humans- and a categorising term for other groupings of humans bound by ethnic, racial and/or political ties, would not, could not care or take personal offense to insults but, rather, the people who are proud of this fictional term will often take personal insult if their fictional term is insulted which is not only quite impossible but also ridiculous from an emotionless, inhuman point of view like the one I am taking now.
The same theory works with the Qu'ran, and a lot of other objects.
The Qu'ran itself is very little more than a bundle of thin layers of wood with exotic symbols on it which some people view as intelligible. Like a nation, it would, could not take personal offense or care about insults. However, like with a nation, there are humans that could take personal offense to insults to the Koran. However, whereas people support a nation because of pride or other reasons, people taking personal offense to insults to the Koran do so because the Koran -which, again, is simply a bundle of wooden sheets with symbols on it- has an important significance to them because they view the bundle of wood as a divine thing and/or interpreted the symbols on the wooden layers as fact or/and life philosophies and the bundle of wood has a larger importance to them than, let's say, people without faith who view this bundle of wood as it is, a bundle of wood with symbols, possibly without even glancing at the symbols and recognise their importance to the people that defend it.
At least, that's my philosophy. All hail my Great Wall of Text.
Originally Posted by A.J.P. Taylor
Originally Posted by Miel Cools
Cò am Fear am measg ant-sluaigh,
A mhaireas buan gu bràth?
Chan eil sinn uileadh ach air chuart,
Mar dhìthein buaile fàs,Bheir siantannan na bliadhna sìos,'S nach tog a' ghrian an àird.
Originally Posted by Jörg Friedrich
Originally Posted by Louis Napoleon III, Des Idees Napoleoniennes
Originally Posted by Wolfgang Held
Jajem ssoref is m'n korewE goochem mit e wenk, e nar mit e shtompWer niks is, hot kawsones
Have a question about China? Get your answer here.
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." -Albert Einstein
https://www.politicalcompass.org/ana...2.38&soc=-3.44 <-- "Dangerous far right bigot!" -SJWs