Templars/Hospitallers?

[Lupu]

Who said that templars and hospitallers were different? They were basically the same knights joining different orders.
The difference should lay in the surcoats, the templars should have less heat effect(counting in deserts and hot battlefields) because of the white coats.
And hospitallers should get a better dicipline, because black is much more noticable in a formation to keep it tidy, especially in the sun.

[Samariten]

you know nothing do you...the hospitallers was mostly practicing medicine and nursing of wounded an developed fighting knights aswell....

[Lupu]

The fighting knights shouldnt be other than the templars should they? The fighting hospitallers were no mediciners, but it was the main practice of the order.

Edit: Sorry, pointless thread, knights cant be defined as military units worse or better than eachother, you cant say a knight from outremer should be better than a knight from europe, he is in BC because of variety right?

Knights cant be historically be represented by TW in variety, in reality a "latin knight" would sometimes be a better fighter than a "knight of jerusalem" and sometimes not.

Sorry didnt think before I posted.

[Galain_Ironhide]

:hmmm:

Don't know what to think about that one. Edit: No offence intendended from my remark. I see you edited anyway. There is already a thread discussion going on the KoJ knights regarding balance and attributes