Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 102

Thread: I really do not want to have a religious debate but......

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default I really do not want to have a religious debate but......

    They are always very entertaining, hehehe. Look at my sig, you know how i feel.

  2. #2
    Cliomhdubh's Avatar Campidoctor
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    1,947

    Default Re: I really do not want to have a religious debate but......

    A casual stroll through the lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything.

    Is man one of God's blunders? Or is God one of man's blunders?

    Friedrich Nietzsche

    From the great Gales of Ireland
    Are the men that God made mad,
    For all their wars are merry,
    And all their songs are sad.
    G. K. Chesterton

  3. #3

    Default Re: I really do not want to have a religious debate but......

    Quote Originally Posted by Cliomhdubh View Post
    A casual stroll through the lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything.

    Is man one of God's blunders? Or is God one of man's blunders?

    Friedrich Nietzsche
    Well said.

  4. #4
    Thanatos's Avatar Now Is Not the Time
    Moderator Emeritus

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    33,188

    Default Re: I really do not want to have a religious debate but......

    Oh dear, another self-proclaimed communist, this will be fun.

  5. #5
    Farnan's Avatar Saviors of the Japanese
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Right behind you starring over your shoulder.
    Posts
    31,638

    Default Re: I really do not want to have a religious debate but......

    Quote Originally Posted by Nex Addo View Post
    Why don't you tell me exactly what is wrong with communism, if you know so much.
    Typical Western Communist -



    Notice what they're wearing. All those clothes are sold and made by for-profit corporations. Thus in their communist rally they are supporting American bussiness.

    Here's something else wrong with Communism:

    http://www.amazon.com/GUEVARA-Classi...7609371&sr=1-1

    You can buy it for only $15.00 and get all the cool shirt comments you want. Fight for Communsim while supporting the Buergosiue...

    In truth communism is just really pitiful.

    You'll look back at yourself and wonder why you ever thought this way when you get older.

    Oh by the way Communism is out, the new "cool" teenage rebellion is Objectivism.
    “The nation that will insist upon drawing a broad line of demarcation between the fighting man and the thinking man is liable to find its fighting done by fools and its thinking by cowards.”

    —Sir William Francis Butler

  6. #6

    Default Re: I really do not want to have a religious debate but......

    Quote Originally Posted by Farnan View Post
    Typical Western Communist -



    Notice what they're wearing. All those clothes are sold and made by for-profit corporations. Thus in their communist rally they are supporting American bussiness.

    Here's something else wrong with Communism:

    http://www.amazon.com/GUEVARA-Classi...7609371&sr=1-1

    You can buy it for only $15.00 and get all the cool shirt comments you want. Fight for Communsim while supporting the Buergosiue...

    In truth communism is just really pitiful.

    You'll look back at yourself and wonder why you ever thought this way when you get older.

    Oh by the way Communism is out, the new "cool" teenage rebellion is Objectivism.
    I know what you are saying and i agree and all these people are ing tools, the idea of communism is what is what im talking about maybe communism-socialism. You just dont like it because it is not convenient.

  7. #7
    LoZz's Avatar who are you?
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Northants, UK
    Posts
    10,021

    Default Re: I really do not want to have a religious debate but......

    Moved to ethos

  8. #8
    Lawrence of Arabia's Avatar Citizen
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    4,874

    Default Re: I really do not want to have a religious debate but......

    Quote Originally Posted by Nex Addo View Post
    They are always very entertaining, hehehe. Look at my sig, you know how i feel.
    Therefore we have what to discuss, exactly?

    Okay, let me say inflammatory things to start things off.

    Christians are child molesters and rapists.
    Jews sacrifice non-Jewish babies and drink the blood during Pass Over.
    Muslims take heads in the name of Allah, and kill every infidel they see.


    Or...

    Theists are stupid for believing in imaginary friends.

    Or...

    Atheists are lost, self-absorbed, better-than-thou miscreants..
    Quote Originally Posted by Empi Rapper View Post
    Go on Farnan, go and help those despicable thugs you call our soldiers to kill some of the poorest people on the planet.
    Quote Originally Posted by Empi Rapper View Post
    Don't you realize that it is a good thing that so many British soldiers have already been killed as punishment for the invasion?


  9. #9
    Thanatos's Avatar Now Is Not the Time
    Moderator Emeritus

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    33,188

    Default Re: I really do not want to have a religious debate but......

    I detect much hatred in this thread, master.

  10. #10
    Dunecat's Avatar Praefectus
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    The United States of America
    Posts
    6,438

    Default Re: I really do not want to have a religious debate but......

    Quote Originally Posted by Thanatos View Post
    I detect much hatred in this thread, master.
    Sense.

    Jedi's and Sith use the term "sense", as they feel the force as a part of them, not outside their senses which they can perceive. It is a subtle but important difference.

    ...

    STAR WARS NAZI STRIKES AGAIN!!!

    Oh, and as the good book says, "..Let us compete with our Christian brother this day for our daily bread, so that the invisible hand of free daily bread markets might save our souls, and forgive us our transgressions..."
    Last edited by Dunecat; April 08, 2008 at 07:05 AM.

  11. #11

    Default Re: I really do not want to have a religious debate but......

    Communism replaces the cults of yesterday and the Abrahamic Religions with the sole cult of Marxist dogma as a sacrossanct, unchangeable, untouchable and unquestionable doctrine.
    "Romans not only easily conquered those who fought by cutting, but mocked them too. For the cut, even delivered with force, frequently does not kill, when the vital parts are protected by equipment and bone. On the contrary, a point brought to bear is fatal at two inches; for it is necessary that whatever vital parts it penetrates, it is immersed. Next, when a cut is delivered, the right arm and flank are exposed. However, the point is delivered with the cover of the body and wounds the enemy before he sees it."

    - Flavius Vegetius Renatus (in Epitoma Rei Militari, ca. 390)

  12. #12
    Blau&Gruen's Avatar Civitate
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Wagadougou, Bourkina Faso
    Posts
    5,545

    Default Re: I really do not want to have a religious debate but......

    I have just been brought in a discussion in another thread on an argument of how you can prevent an ethical fundamentalism and still take a moral stand.

    You can say, the moral subject (you) does just then equal with the subject of ethical commonsense (you and others) when the moral subject can translate its assumptions into ought-sentences of commonsense (ought-sentences which are also acceptable to others). If this is not possible the moral subject has to recognize the conflict, and a) either to abstain from formulating objective moral claims (ethical ought-sentences) or b) to sustain the conflict of moral assumptions and ethical requirements.

    Opinions?

    The week points are probably: "can translate assumptions", "recognize the conflict".
    Last edited by Blau&Gruen; April 07, 2008 at 05:15 PM.
    Patronized by Ozymandias
    Je bâtis ma demeure
    Le livre des questions
    Un étranger avec sous le bras un livre de petit format

    golemzombiroboticvacuumcleanerstrawberrycream

  13. #13
    Ummon's Avatar Indefinitely Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    19,146

    Default Re: I really do not want to have a religious debate but......

    Quote Originally Posted by Blau&Gruen View Post
    I have just been brought in a discussion in another thread on an argument of how you can prevent an ethical fundamentalism and still take a moral stand.

    You can say, the moral subject (you) does just then equal with the subject of ethical commonsense (you and others) when the moral subject can translate its assumptions into ought-sentences of commonsense (ought-sentences which are also acceptable to others). If this is not possible the moral subject has to recognize the conflict, and a) either to abstain from formulating objective moral claims (ethical ought-sentences) or b) to sustain the conflict of moral assumptions and ethical requirements.

    Opinions?

    The week points are probably: "can translate assumptions", "recognize the conflict".
    Descend to the mothers. They are not of words, and they can't be translated if not circumstantially, some would say.

  14. #14
    Blau&Gruen's Avatar Civitate
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Wagadougou, Bourkina Faso
    Posts
    5,545

    Default Re: I really do not want to have a religious debate but......

    Quote Originally Posted by Ummon View Post
    not of words
    sat-cit-ānanda
    It is a walk by foot uphills.
    But it is kind that you care.
    Last edited by Blau&Gruen; April 08, 2008 at 02:01 PM.
    Patronized by Ozymandias
    Je bâtis ma demeure
    Le livre des questions
    Un étranger avec sous le bras un livre de petit format

    golemzombiroboticvacuumcleanerstrawberrycream

  15. #15
    Ummon's Avatar Indefinitely Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    19,146

    Default Re: I really do not want to have a religious debate but......

    Quote Originally Posted by Blau&Gruen View Post
    sat-cit-ānanda
    It is a walk by foot uphills.
    But it is kind that you care.
    Uphill, downhill, it's about the same.

    It's always nice to exchange mysterious tidbits, in any case!

  16. #16
    Aziel's Avatar Primicerius
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Israel
    Posts
    3,382

    Default Re: I really do not want to have a religious debate but......

    Quote Originally Posted by Voltaire le Philosophe View Post
    Communism replaces the cults of yesterday and the Abrahamic Religions with the sole cult of Marxist dogma as a sacrossanct, unchangeable, untouchable and unquestionable doctrine.
    Communist personality cult were mostly worshiping to Lenin, Marx and Engels, while Lenin headed first and the Marxist couple came after him. At Communist China there was the strongest Communist personality cult in history as far as I know, but instaed of any Marx, Lenin or Engels, Mao Zedong was the person that was worshiped.

    An intresting note is that where the larger and stronger the personality cult is, the most people die. For example: Cambodia, Pol Pot's era - 1.7 +- deaths; USSR, Stalin's era - 30 millions +- daeths; Communist China, Mao's era - 70 million +- deaths.
    Sigh...

  17. #17
    Dunecat's Avatar Praefectus
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    The United States of America
    Posts
    6,438

    Default Re: I really do not want to have a religious debate but......

    Here they (the bourgeoisie) go again!

    No seriously there are some things Marx was right about, particularly his sociological observations of capitalist influence on the collective values and norms at the time that still remain prevalent to this day.

  18. #18

    Default Re: I really do not want to have a religious debate but......

    Yes, sometimes Marx did made a clever analysis on economy and capitalism, but the bulk of his theory as intended failed miserably as shown by the experiments conducted in the XX century.
    "Romans not only easily conquered those who fought by cutting, but mocked them too. For the cut, even delivered with force, frequently does not kill, when the vital parts are protected by equipment and bone. On the contrary, a point brought to bear is fatal at two inches; for it is necessary that whatever vital parts it penetrates, it is immersed. Next, when a cut is delivered, the right arm and flank are exposed. However, the point is delivered with the cover of the body and wounds the enemy before he sees it."

    - Flavius Vegetius Renatus (in Epitoma Rei Militari, ca. 390)

  19. #19
    Aziel's Avatar Primicerius
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Israel
    Posts
    3,382

    Default Re: I really do not want to have a religious debate but......

    Quote Originally Posted by Voltaire le Philosophe View Post
    Yes, sometimes Marx did made a clever analysis on economy and capitalism, but the bulk of his theory as intended failed miserably as shown by the experiments conducted in the XX century.
    Marx was a theoretical economist, he didn't based his theory on diagrams, models or calculations, but on words only.
    Sigh...

  20. #20
    chriscase's Avatar Chairman Miao
    Civitate Patrician

    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    5,718

    Default Re: I really do not want to have a religious debate but......

    Quote Originally Posted by Voltaire le Philosophe View Post
    Yes, sometimes Marx did made a clever analysis on economy and capitalism, but the bulk of his theory as intended failed miserably as shown by the experiments conducted in the XX century.
    One has to wonder at the validity of the experiments.

    If Marx's central argument was that the characteristic economic traits of capitalism inevitably lead to an evolution of capitalism to a different system, it's hard to say any of the experiments you mention really apply to it.

    Something like Lenin's State and Revolution attempts to justify State-imposed socialism as a valid experiment, but the fact that it requires a dedicated auxiliary work to do so only confirms that Marx's original work did not sanction such an experiment.

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •