Question in the title. Please vote in the poll. I think that there's a higher chance that he will endorse Hillary because both their ideas were similar, so it's logical that he'll endorse her. Go Hillary!!!!!!!!!!![]()
Question in the title. Please vote in the poll. I think that there's a higher chance that he will endorse Hillary because both their ideas were similar, so it's logical that he'll endorse her. Go Hillary!!!!!!!!!!![]()
Neither, I think he is going to let the people decide, but if it gets to a point to where the Democratic Party is imploding I think he will be pressured to endorse the front-runner by the party insiders.
“Today, the general will of all nations is calling for fundamental change... The prerequisite to this change is a change in goals, intentions, and directions. If tyrannical goals are repackaged in an attractive and deceptive package and imposed on nations again, the people, awakened, will stand up against them.”
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
Truth is treason in the Empire of Lies.
Ron Paul
Originally, he was going to come out and endorse, but the insiders of the Democratic Party kept on calling him and told him to not endorse anyone yet, so the excitement will be prolonged.
Last edited by Emperor Taizu; April 03, 2008 at 09:41 PM.
If I were him, I would endorse neither, after all surveys have shown that even if either of the two (Barack or Hilary) drop out, their supporters will not vote for the opposition, they'd rather vote for Republicans, so what's the point of backing someone when it'll most likely do nothing?
Only case I can see this happening is if the scenario came up-as many have been saying-where the Democratic party is in serious trouble of breaking, then it would be mandatory.
"Gafflwn Dihenydd O’r fuddugol yn wiriol sydd, Ni fydd neb yn ein drechu, Falch ydy ni I drochu, Traed o flaen I’r Annwn, mewn y gwybodaeth fe godwn ni."
I don't care about whatever floats Edwards' boat.
"Romans not only easily conquered those who fought by cutting, but mocked them too. For the cut, even delivered with force, frequently does not kill, when the vital parts are protected by equipment and bone. On the contrary, a point brought to bear is fatal at two inches; for it is necessary that whatever vital parts it penetrates, it is immersed. Next, when a cut is delivered, the right arm and flank are exposed. However, the point is delivered with the cover of the body and wounds the enemy before he sees it."
- Flavius Vegetius Renatus (in Epitoma Rei Militari, ca. 390)
He will endorse Obama, cause he's going to win and Edwards is a politician who yust wants to secure his position for the next 8 years...![]()
He'll endorse whatever his masters tell him to endorse.
And choosing between Obama and Clinton is like trying to decide whether to pick a peanut from a pile ofor a hayseed from a pile of
.
[edit] Mods, using smilies as filters is still stupid. Please go back to using **.
Obama becasue Clinton is a little lying, "we came under sniper fire, we had to run into the base, there was no greeting ceremony, i was under constant danger"
Yes, but does she do anul?
Question that matter, please!![]()
It doesn't matter as much as people would like to. Probably no one. I think he just can't figure out why he was trailing behind such low percentages (10-15%) and now he is pissed off and trying to do his own little vengeance on both remaining candidates by doing nothing.
LOL, there were no snipers anywhere.
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2...campaign-says/I spoke with William Nash, who was the commander of U.S. troops in Bosnia and was at the Tuzla airport with Hillary Clinton. He said there was no threat of sniper fire at the airport during her visit. He said that Mrs. Clinton was gracious during her visit and took pictures with the soldiers, but “she never had her head down. There was no sniper threat that I know of.”
Last edited by HorseArcher; April 04, 2008 at 10:07 PM.
Last edited by Emperor Taizu; April 04, 2008 at 10:15 PM.
New Question
Will John Edward's endorsement of Hillary/Obama help either one significantly, or will it somehow hurt the candidate?
Last edited by Emperor Taizu; April 04, 2008 at 10:18 PM.
Neither. He is too similar to both Obama and Hilary.
I thought he did already.
end thising election already.
The fascists of the future will be called anti-fascistsThe best lack all conviction, while the worst are full of passionate intensity
Obama, because Obama has already as good as won now and there can be nothing gained from supporting a loser.
Cluny the Scourge's online Rome: Total War voice-commentated battle videos can be found here: http://uk.youtube.com/profile?user=C...e1&view=videos - View on High Quality only.
Cluny will roast you on a spit in your own juice...
John Edwards maintains about as much power with his endorsemnet as does mine.
Sure I've been called a xenophobe, but the truth is Im not. I honestly feel that America is the best country and all other countries aren't as good. That used to be called patriotism.
Barack Obama is possibly more inauthentic than John Edwards.
In Patronicum sub Siblesz
More like who cares?
And why?
Sorry, I just don't like that ambulance chaser. He's also from my home state.
ttt
Adopted son of Lord Sephiroth, Youngest sibling of Pent uP Rage, Prarara the Great, Nerwen Carnesîr, TB666 and, Boudicca. In the great Family of the Black Prince