Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: The Five Good Emperors Essays

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default The Five Good Emperors Essays

    Hi guys i am doing an essay about the five good emperors! The first one i wrote was about Neva: The five good emperors was the expression that describes the time period between 96 A.D. and 180 A.D. in which the Roman Empire was at its peak.

    There were five emperors who ruled in this period starting with Nerva and ending with Marcus Aurelius. The reason for the success of these five emperors was that all of them adopted a successor in their lifetime, except Marcus Aurelius. Even though Marcus Aurelius was a brilliant philosopher, he simply couldn’t disinherit his son Commodus which plunged the empire into a downfall.
    Before the five good emperors, around the time of sixty eight A.D when the Julius-Claudius dynasty ended because no heir to the imperial throne exsisted, the Roman empire engaged in a massive civil war in which a general named Vespasian won the empire to start the Flavian dynasty. But this dynasty was ended twenty seven years later when a senator, assassinated the lazy, and cruel emperor Domitian. Nerva then became the new emperor and solved a problem that would plagued the empire before he was enthroned. Before and after the reign of the five good emperors, there was always the problem of getting a good successor. So, Nerva started a system of adopting a son in your lifetime, so he can “watch and learn from the master” and when he died he would have a peaceful transfer in power. But before we get entangled in his reign you should know his life before he was emperor to know why he became the emperor of the most powerful nation in the known world. He was born of noble birth, able to trace his ancestry to a consul in 39b.c. on his father’s side as well as to Tiberius on his mother’s side. He was born on November 8, 30 A.D with the name of Marcus Cocceius Nerva.
    Not much of his childhood is known but we do know that he belonged to a senatorial family and did not try to pursue the career of military or public speaking. He finally pops up in history when he is appointed as praetor in 65 A.D. In this office he was extremely helpful in revealing the conspiracy of Piso against Nero. His statue was erected in the palace because of this loyal act. When Nero fell in 68 A.D. he was loyal to Vespasian and thus was given a dual consulship with the emperor. Later he gained another consulship with Domitian because he warned him of a revolt in Germany. But when Domitian’s restrained relationship with the senate and the people became even worse, a senator assassinated him in 96 A.D. Nerva was probably named emperor because he was a good senator who had friends in good places and also because he knew how to negotiate. As soon as he was emperor he made some changes. He renamed Domitian’s palace- the house of the people and lived at Vespasian’s old palace. He pardoned all the people Domitian exiled or imprisoned as long as they didn’t do a serious crime and vowed in front of the senate that he would not execute any of its members.
    He appointed five consular senators to basically help him from spending too much of imperial funds. No statues made of him were of gold or silver and he offered loans to Italians as long as they paid 5% interest to support needy families. Actually it was just a scheme to put more money in the imperial treasury. He didn’t do any major public works because he had such a short reign but he did make repairs to the Coliseum or as it was really called “the Flavian amphitheater” when the Tiber flooded. Militarily, he started colonies in Africa which were used as land payment to the legionaries. Other than that business with the army was carried on as usual. He was very smart in choosing his major appointments; giving them to men he knew and trusted. When a man named Trajan won brilliant victory against Germany, Nerva saw a chance to have an heir to the throne and wisely chose this man as his successor. It was a decision made just in time as a month or two later he died of a stroke. He was a fanatically loyal man with a reign was short and sweet, lasting only three years but it was three years that changed the empire for the better. Maybe with a longer reign Nerva could have become the next Augustus. He started a policy that led to a golden age in Roman history with the empire reaching its peak in power and influence.
    Last edited by The10thLegion von Döbeln; March 23, 2008 at 12:51 PM.

  2. #2

    Default Re: The Five Good Emperors Essays

    I don't see any factual mistakes...good stuff.

  3. #3

    Default Re: The Five Good Emperors Essays

    yes i got much of my information off of www.Romanempire.org/emperors if i remember correctly. I am going to do another essay on Trajan next.

  4. #4

    Default Re: The Five Good Emperors Essays

    Ah my Protégé, Don't become like me, I write too much!

  5. #5

    Default Re: The Five Good Emperors Essays

    Hey sounds really cool and such but could you use more spaces/paragraphs etc?

    Atm it's a bit hard to read I'm afraid =/

  6. #6

    Default Re: The Five Good Emperors Essays

    oh sorry. ill try to edit it. I put just random pushing of "enter" everywhere.
    btw, this is my scriptorium writing competetion article. If you like it vote for me But make sure you read the other articles First

  7. #7

    Default Re: The Five Good Emperors Essays

    Way better, thanks

  8. #8
    Flavius Nevitta's Avatar Civitate
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Berlin, Germany
    Posts
    1,747

    Default Re: The Five Good Emperors Essays

    Just some sidenotes:

    Even though Marcus Aurelius was a brilliant philosopher, he simply couldn’t disinherit his son Commodus which plunged the empire into a downfall.
    This was not Marcus Aurelius fault. It was not possible to choose anyone but his son. Anything else would have led to a new civil war. The army was always in favour of dynastic succession and Commodus wouldn't have accepted being disinherited.

    So, Nerva started a system of adopting a son in your lifetime, so he can “watch and learn from the master” and when he died he would have a peaceful transfer in power.
    I wouldn't call it "start a system". The only reason for this was that none of the emperors had a son who could inherit the throne until Marcus. Nerva therefore didn't start anything on purpose, there just was no other choice...if you don't have a son adopt one...same thing as Augustus had done with Tiberius really.

    the lazy, and cruel emperor Domitian
    I really wouldn't call him lazy. He tried quite a lot but was unlucky concerning his foreign politics. He was one of the emperors who tried to change the principate into a strenghened monarchy (like Gaius and Nero had during the 1st century) but they all failed to win against the still strong senateorial class. Something which eventually changed when Gallienus threw the senators out of the army around 260, too late as the 3rd century crisis had already started but still saved the empire for another 200 years.


    Other than that business with the army was carried on as usual.
    You forgot to mention his problem with the Praetorians who were not happy at all with him.

    When a man named Trajan won brilliant victory against Germany, Nerva saw a chance to have an heir to the throne and wisely chose this man as his successor.
    Traian was choosen earlier already. He didn't recieve the most important military command closest to Italy without a reason. Especially as Traian's cursus is not very typical. Traian had strong support among some important families at this time. The troops in Germania superior had rebelled 2 times already so Traian was most probably posted there to ensure their loyalty.
    RESTITVTOR LIBERTATIS ET ROMANAE RELIGIONIS

    MINERVAE ET SOLIS INVICTI DISCIPVLVS

    formerly known as L.C.Cinna

  9. #9

    Default Re: The Five Good Emperors Essays

    hmmmm, interesting.

  10. #10

    Default Re: The Five Good Emperors Essays

    Worst part about writing this stuff...the critics! "P

  11. #11
    Opifex
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    New York, USA
    Posts
    15,154

    Default Re: The Five Good Emperors Essays

    I really think the 'good emperors' streak clearly starts with Vespasian. And anyway, this 'five emperors only' thing, that I see frequently stated, has an intrinsic problem, looking for "the best of the best"... Thus sometimes it gets down to four, because "Nerva doesn't count", sometimes onward to three because "Pius doesn't count", until it gets whittled down to Trajan Hadrian and Aurelius, and then people throw all that out and just go back to Augustus. It's a little bit in a way self-defeating. The 'Good Emperors" were basically emperors of the 1st and 2nd centuries AD in general, that's why it's called "pax romana", and the three bad ones (Caligula, Nero, Domitian) were the actual exception. It wasn't called Pax Romana for no reason... it would be pretty hard to make a Total War game that was set in 1st and 2nd centuries AD...
    Last edited by SigniferOne; March 26, 2008 at 04:01 AM.


    "If ye love wealth greater than liberty,
    the tranquility of servitude greater than
    the animating contest for freedom, go
    home from us in peace. We seek not
    your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch
    down and lick the hand that feeds you,
    and may posterity forget that ye were
    our countrymen."
    -Samuel Adams

  12. #12
    Nikron's Avatar Senator
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Marbella, Spain
    Posts
    1,487

    Default Re: The Five Good Emperors Essays

    Dont forget Constantine the Great ( the illyrian btw )...

  13. #13
    Giorgos's Avatar Deus Ex Machina
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Larissa/Skiathos Hellas(Greece)
    Posts
    5,557

    Default Re: The Five Good Emperors Essays

    Quote Originally Posted by Nikron View Post
    Dont forget Constantine the Great ( the illyrian btw )...
    Who became what he became owing in major part to his Roman and Greek upbringing. Not his Illyrian one.
    Last edited by Giorgos; March 26, 2008 at 07:39 PM.


  14. #14

    Default Re: The Five Good Emperors Essays

    But is there anymore historical inaccuracies? And do you like it guys?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •